Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian penal code ipc 1860 sections 448 · Page 1 of about 610 results (0.064 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 14 2003

Vidyadharan Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-14-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354, 441 and 448; Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1) and 14; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 2(1), 4(2), 5 and 193

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)1019; 2004(1)BLJR497; 2004CriLJ605; JT2003(9)SC89; 2004(1)KLT105(SC); 2004(2)MhLj596; 2004MPLJ251(SC); 2004(I)OLR11; 2003(9)SCALE581; (2004)1SCC215

Pasayat, J.1. Appellant faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 354 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the 'IPC') and Section 3(1)(XI) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2008

Shaik Nagoor Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Its Public Prosecutor, High Cou ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-20-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 306, 354 and 448

Reported in : AIR2008SC1500; 2008CriLJ2079; JT2008(3)SC101; 2008(2)SCALE670; 2008AIRSCW1590; 2008(4)LH(SC)2313

By the impugned judgment conviction of the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 354 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') was upheld, but the conviction for offence punishable under Section 306 IPC was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2004

Mangilal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-05-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 357, 357(1), 357(3), 357(4) and 357(5); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 323, 448 and 452; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855; Constitution of India - Article 366

Reported in : AIR2004SC1280; 2004(1)ALD(Cri)447; 2004CriLJ880; 2004(1)CTC474; JT2004(1)SC81; 2004(1)KLT1038(SC); 2004(1)SCALE42; (2004)2SCC447

offences punishable under Section 452, 148, 323 read with Section 149, 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'the IPC') for allegedly causing death of one Rajinder Kumar (hereinafter referred to as 'the … to jail, direction was given that each of them shall pay compensation @ Rs. 30,000/- in terms of Sections 357(3) and (4) of the Code. The accused-appellant was also directed to pay similar compensation. Fixing a proportion … persons including the appellant were found guilty for offences relatable to Section 448. They were also found guilty of offence relatable to Section 323 read

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 19 2007

Kalegura Padma Rao and anr. Vs. the State of A.P., Rep. by the Public ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-19-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 299, 300, 302, 304, 307, 324, 327 and 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161

Reported in : AIR2007SC1299; JT2007(3)SC513; RLW2007(2)SC1152; 2007(3)SCALE209; 2007AIRSCW1447; (2007)2Crimes217(SC); JT2007(3)SC513; 2007LawHerald(SC)844.

with Section 149, Section 302 read with Section 149 and Section 324 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The III Additional Sessions Judge, Karimnagar found all the accused persons guilty of … Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted. 2. Appellant along with 14 others was convicted for offences punishable under Sections 148, 448 read with Section 149, Section 302 read with Section 149 and Section 324 read with Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 2008

Pogula Komuraiah Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by the Public Prosecutor

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-15-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149 to 304, 324 and 448

Reported in : AIR2008SC1226; 2008(2)ALD(Cri)589; 2008CriLJ1644; 2008(1)SCALE388; (2008)3SCC686; 2008AIRSCW1221; AIR2008SC1226; (2008)2SCC(Cri)718; 2008(1)Crimes253; 2008(1)SCALE388.

read with Section 149 and Section 302 read with Section 149, 324 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC').4. The High Court by the impugned order disposed of the appeals with the following … nos. 1114, 1128, 1130 and 1155 of 2005. 3. 16 accused persons were charged for offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 448 read with Section 149 and Section 302 read with Section 149, 324 read with Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2009

Kirender Sarkar and ors. Vs. State of Assam

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-27-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 302, 323, 447, 448 and 506

Reported in : AIR2009SC2513; 2009CriLJ3727; JT2009(6)SC114; RLW2009(4)SC3606; 2009(6)SCALE589; (2009)12SCC342

seven accused persons, the present appellants were convicted for offence punishable under Sections 147, 448 and 323 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year, six months and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2008

Ponnam Chandraiah Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-30-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 304, 324 and 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161

Reported in : AIR2008SC3209; 2008CriLJ4298; 2008(10)SCALE639; (2008)11SCC640; 2008AIRSCW5429; 2008(3)Crimes259; 2008(4)LH(SC)2837

read with Sections 149, 302 read with Section 149 and Section 324 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') Learned III Additional Sessions judge, Karimnagar for each one of them guilty. In … Court.3. Sixteen persons including the appellants faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 448 read with Sections 149, 302 read with Section 149 and Section 324 read with Section 149 of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1969

Syed Jaferuklah Jaferi Vs. Abdul Aziz and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-03-1969

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 197; Wakfs Act, 1954 - Sections 65; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 295A, 341, 426, 448 and 454

Reported in : AIR1970AP13; 1970CriLJ26

Code is as follows:-'197(1) when any person who is judge within the meaning of Section 19 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or when any Magistrate, or when any public servant who is not removable from his … person who is judge within the meaning of Section 19 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or when any Magistrate, or when any … petitioner filed a complaint before the 8th City Magistrate against respondents 2 to 8 for alleged offences under Sections 448, 454, 341, 295-A and 426, I. P. C. and against respondent No. 1 for abetment of those offences.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2010

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. the Committee for Protection of Demo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-17-2010

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 1(1), 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 5(1) and 6; ;Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27; ;Explosives Act, 1884 - Section 9B; ;Government of India Act, 1935; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 149, 201, 302, 364, 436 and 448; ;Constitution of India - Articles 1, 13, 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 31C, 32, 142, 144, 226, 226(1), 245 to 255 and 256 to 261

Reported in : 2010(2)KCCR785,RLW2010(1)SC822,2010(2)SCALE467,2010(2)LC1047(SC):(2010)3SCC571

2001 itself but the First Information Report ('the FIR' for short) for offences under Sections 148/149/448/436/364/302/201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'the IPC') read with Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 9(B) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2012

Smt.Sundari Vs. Smt.Sushila

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-17-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC) 1860 - Sections 448, 427, 109, 170, 120-B, 307, 350, 357, 383, 405, 425, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 503, 504, 502, 352; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 397, 401, 482, 313, 210(2), 259, 250, 352, 210 Chapter 19-B; Constitution of India - Articles 21

the petitioners/accused shall be refunded to them. [S.NAGAMUTHU, J.] Indian Penal Code(IPC) 1860 - Sections 448, 427, 109, 170, 120-B -- No other witness was … viz., A1 to A4 in the police report case and sentenced them under various penal provisions of the Indian Penal Code as extracted in the first paragraph of this order.10. So far as the case in C.C.No.296 of 2002 … Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai. The trial court, by judgement dated 12.04.2006, convicted the petitioners 1 to 3 under Sections 448 & 427 of IPC and sentenced them to undergo simple imprisonment for six months for the offence under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial