Advanced Search Results

Shyamal Ghosh Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC)1860 - Sections 302, 201, 379, 411, 34; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC),(CrPC) 1973 - Section 164, 161, 313; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 8

Shyamal Ghosh, were charged with offences under Sections 302, 201, 379, 411 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (for short, the 'IPC'). All these accused were found to be guilty of the offences with which they

State of A.P. Vs. S. Narasimha Kumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 70, 120B, 381, 411 and 414; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 258(2), 306(2), 309(2), 377, 378, 386(1), 394, 404, 411A(2), 417, 431 and 562; Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2006SC2924; 102(2006)CLT542(SC); 2006CriLJ4090; [2006(4)JCR46(SC)]; JT2006(6)SC358; 2006(3)KLT505(SC); RLW2006(4)SC3283; 2006(7)SCALE97; (2006)5SCC683

A- 2, A-3 etc. A-1 was charged with offences punishable under Sections 381, 411 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC'); A-2 to A-11 and A-15 were charged with offences punishable under Sections 120-B and

State of U.P. Vs. Ajai Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307, 394 and 411; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 378

Reported in : AIR2008SC1269; 2008(2)ALD(Cri)467; 2008(3)ALT(Cri)300; 2008CriLJ1937; 2008(2)SCALE276; (2008)3SCC351; 2008AIRSCW1303; 2008(1)Crimes399; 2008(2)AICLR459; 2008(3)LH(SC)2188; 2008(2)KCCRSN161

could not be arrested. Four persons faced trial for offences punishable under Sections 394, 307, 411 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The allegation was that on 15.3.1994 while the informant alongwith one Sushil Kumar,

J. Muthukrishnan and anr., Etc. Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173(2), 190, 197, 197(1), 227, 306(4)(1), 306(5), 403(I) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 120B, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165A, 166, 167, 168, 169, 182, 193, 197, 198, 201, 204, 211, 218, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 263A, 379, 380, 381, 382, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 403, 406, 407, 408, 409, 411, 412, 413, 414, 417, 418, 419, 420, 465, 466, 467 468, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477A, 489-B, 489-C, 489-D and 489-E; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1), 5(2), 6 and 6(1); Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3, 5, 5(1) and 6; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2570

476, 477A, 489-B, 489-C, 489-D and 489-E of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860). (These offences are not applicable to the State of … instant case do not prima facie disclose any offence whatever having been committed by them either under the Indian Penal Code or under the provisions of the Act, 1947 and in such circumstances, it is nothing but sheer abuse … instant case do not prima facie disclose any offence whatever having been committed by them either under the Indian Penal Code or under the provisions of the Act, 1947 and in such circumstances, it is nothing but … learned X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Madras On 2-9-1987 of alleged offences under Sections 120B read with 420, 477A, 419, 467 and 471, I.P.C. against accused … 387, 388, 389, 403, 406, 407, 408, 409, 411, 412, 413, 414, 417, 418, 419, 420, 465,

M. Kishan Rao and ors. Vs. Mrs. P. Santha Reddy and anr. (No. 2)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CompanyCriminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 299, 300, 624A, 627 and 629A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, 4(2), 5, 93, 93(1) and 94; Constitution of India - Article 20(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 409 and 411

Reported in : [2002]111CompCas373(AP)

which was taken on file by the learned special judge for the offences under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 299, 300 and 629A of the Companies Act, 1956,2. The parties shall be referred to … which was taken on file by the learned special judge for the offences under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 299, 300 and 629A of the Companies Act, 1956,2. The parties shall be … complaint against A-1 to A-4 for the offences under Sections 409 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code and also for the offences of contravention

Ram Naresh Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 380, 411, 413, 414 and 457; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 155, 156, 156(3), 157, 157(1), 158, 159, 160 to 163, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 172, 173, 173(1), 173(3), 176, 190, 319 and 491

Reported in : (2009)11SCC299

learned Chief Judicial Magistrate on remand taking cognizance of offences punishable under Sections 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC').3. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:One Arun Kumar Mishra (hereinafter referred … submitted supplementary Final Form against the aforesaid four persons indicating commission of offences punishable under Sections 457, 380, 411 and 414 IPC. Final Form was filed so far as appellant is concerned. Learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class,

Alisher Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 411 and 412; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 342; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1974SC1830; 1974CriLJ897; (1974)4SCC254; 1973(5)LC879(SC); MANU/SC/0077/1973

the appellant is reduced to the period of imprisonment already undergo. We order accordingly. Criminal - dacoity - Sections 411 and 412 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appellant-accused convicted for offence under Section 411 - article recovered … the Allahabad High Court whereby the High Court altered the conviction of the appellant from under Section 412 Indian Penal Code to that under Section 411 Indian Penal Code and reduced his sentence from rigorous imprisonment for a period … High Court altered the conviction of the appellant from under Section 412 Indian Penal Code to that under Section 411 Indian Penal Code and reduced

Avinash Madhukar Mukhedkar Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 411; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 41(1), 155(2), 155(4), 460, 465 and 537

Reported in : 1983(2)BomCR791; 1983CriLJ1833; 1984MhLJ88

absolute.15. Petition allowed. Criminal - investigation - Articles 21 and 227 of Constitution of India, Section 411 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 41(1), 155, 460, 465 and 537 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - petitioner allegedly committed … absolute.15. Petition allowed. Criminal - investigation - Articles 21 and 227 of Constitution of India, Section 411 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 41(1), 155, 460, 465 and 537 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - petitioner

Ajaykumar S/O Wiralal Gupta Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 392, 397 and 411; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 1982(2)BomCR176

confirmed. Criminal - stolen goods - Section 411 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appellant convicted under Section 411 - conviction challenged - discovery of … S.W. Puranik, J.1. The appellant stands convicted for the offence under section 411 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and six months by an order of the Additional … S.W. Puranik, J.1. The appellant stands convicted for the offence under section 411 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and six months by an order of … the appellant along with three others were prosecuted for the offence under sections 392 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code for having committed a

Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad Vs. Yerra Arjuna

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 394 and 411; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114 and 414

Reported in : 1998(1)ALD148; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)792

circumstances, the criminal appeal is dismissed. Criminal - evidences leading to acquittal - Sections 302 and 411 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 114 of Evidence Act, 1872 - accused charged with murder - no evidence however found … ORDERV. RAJAGOPALA REDDY, J 1. Therespondent was charged under Sections 302 and 394 IPC. He was not found guilty for the said offences, but was found guilty for the offence under Section