Advanced Search Results

Birbal B.Chouhan and anr. Etc. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 399, 402,

Reported in : 2011(10)SCC776; 2012(1)SCC(Cri)424; AIR2011SCW6762; 2012CriLJ671

tried by the Second Additional Session Judge, Raipur for offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in Sessions Trial No.103/92, convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years … the case a charge sheet was filed against eleven persons for offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402 IPC. The jurisdictional Magistrate soon thereafter committed the appellants to stand trial before the Sessions Judge, Raigarh, who made

State Vs. Ghissu Khan and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 399 and 402

Reported in : AIR1956All464; 1956CriLJ956

surrender and serve out their sentences. Criminal - evidence to prove - Sections 399 and 402 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appellants were arrested … indicate an intention that such act may not be known to any public servant as defined in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or to any person employed upon a railway or to the servant of any public … indicate an intention that such act may not be known to any public servant as defined in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or to any person employed upon a railway or to the servant of

Smt. Subha Raj and anr. Vs. Sankar Sarkar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 401, 402 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 323, 342, 382 and 386

Reported in : 2007CriLJ4293; JT2007(9)SC644; 2007(II)OLR(SC)674a; 2007(9)SCALE346

complaint alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 323, 342, 382, 386 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The learned Magistrate dismissed the complaint after recording statements of the complainant and … a learned Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court allowing the application under Section 401 read with Section 402 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the 'Code'). 3. The main grievance in support of

Anwar Vs. State (Delhi Administration)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 402

Reported in : 1982CriLJ449; 21(1982)DLT26

Criminal - dacoity - Sections 399 and 402 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - a person may not be guilty of dacoity yet guilty of … is seeking quashing of the charge framed against him under Section 399 read with Section 402 of the Indian Penal Code (herein called 'the Code'). This charge along with the charge under the Arms Act was framed by Mr. … is seeking quashing of the charge framed against him under Section 399 read with Section 402 of the Indian Penal Code (herein called 'the Code'). This charge along with the charge under the Arms Act was framed

Sri. Mavid Pasha, Son of Kaiser Pasha and ors. Vs. State by Devaraja P ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC) 1860 - Sections 399, 402

of Devaraja Police Station, Mysore City, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code, have sought for an order to enlarge them on ball.2. According to the case of the prosecution, at … of Devaraja Police Station, Mysore City, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code, have sought for an order to enlarge them on ball.2. According to the case of the … p.m. till the disposal of the case. [K.N.KESHAVANARAYANA, J.] Indian Penal Code(IPC) 1860 - Sections 399, 402 - Making preparation to commit dacoity -- This

The State of Maharashtra, Through Chitra @ Suchitra Yuvraj Avhad Vs. S ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Criminal

Dhule for offence punishable under Section 395, 396, 397, 402, 412, 414, 457 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “I.P.C.”). During pendency of trial, accused No.1 absconded and his trial was separated and charge … Dhule for offence punishable under Section 395, 396, 397, 402, 412, 414, 457 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “I.P.C.”). During pendency of trial, accused No.1 absconded and his trial was separated … No.56 of 1998 before Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule for offence punishable under Section 395, 396, 397, 402, 412, 414, 457 read with 34 of the

Shyam Bharia and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1B); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860- Sections 399, 401 and 402

Reported in : 2005CriLJ1907

their bail bonds are discharged. Criminal - Dacoity - Benefit of Doubt - Sections 399 and 401 of Indian Penal Code,1860(IPC) and 25(1B)(a) of Arms Act - Appellants were convicted by trial court for offence under Sections 399 … it was received by the trial Court for trial.4. The trial Court framed charges punishable under Sections 399, 402, IPC against appellants. Appellant Shyamu Bharia, apart from charges under Sections 399, 402, IPC was further charged under

Rishipal and ors. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 339 and 402; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 238

Reported in : AIR1962All13

be no questionof prejudice being caused to them. (i) Criminal - mensrea - Sections 339 and 402 of Indian Penal Code,1860 - offence not committed - intention present - held, circumstantial evidence will judge whether there is intention … be no questionof prejudice being caused to them. (i) Criminal - mensrea - Sections 339 and 402 of Indian Penal Code,1860 - offence not committed - intention present - held, circumstantial evidence will judge whether there is

Santosh Kumar and Etc. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 399 and 402; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1B), 25(1P), 25(B) and 39; Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1185

be refunded to the appellants. Criminal - Dacoity - Sanction for Charging - Sections 399 and 402 of Indian Penal Code 1860 (IPC) and Sections 25B(a) and 25(1B)(b) of Arms Act 1959 - Investigating officer on information conducted raid

incable Net (Andhra) Limited and ors. Vs. Apaksh Broadband Ltd. and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10(1), 10E, 10E(4C), 10E(4D), 10E(5), 10E(6), 10F, 46, 235 to 250, 254, 291, 293, 397, 398, 402 and 403; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 29, Rule 1; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Company Law Board Regulations, 1991

Reported in : [2008]142CompCas892(AP)

them shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). Section 10E(5) of the Act adumbrates an important principle of judicial adjudicative resolution. It is to … of 2006, before the Company Law Board (CLB), Additional Principal Bench, Chennai. It was under Sections 397, 398, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956, (the 'Act', for brevity) alleging mismanagement and oppression by the majority