Advanced Search Results
Shiv Shankar Singh Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-22-2011
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 395, 396 of 398,; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 156 (3), 173, 203, 204
2012(1)KLT7(SN); 2012(1)SCC130; 2012(1)SCC(Cri)513; 2012(2)SCJ291; 2012(2)MLJ(Crl)383; (2012)1SCC130
cognizance taken by the Magistrate vide order dated 2.8.2008 against the respondent no.2 under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter called `IPC') has been quashed.2. Facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that: A. … 6.12.2004 was lodged by the appellant naming Ramakant Singh and Anand Kumar Singh alongwith 15 other persons under Sections 396/398 IPC.B. However, Kameshwar Singh, the real brother of the appellant and father of Gopal Singh, the deceased,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMd. Rafique @ Chachu Vs. State of West Bengal
Supreme Court of India
Nov-21-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 299, 300, 302, 304, 307 and 398
2008(6)LHSC4219
by the impugned judgment upheld the conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') while setting aside the conviction under Section 398 IPC as done by learned … Courts losing sight of the true scope and meaning of the terms used by the legislature in these sections, allow themselves to be drawn into minute abstractions. The safest way of approach to the interpretation and application
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishna Babu Shelar Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
May-05-1999
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 75, 394 and 398; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45 and 59; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235 and 294
2000(5)BomCR516
of the applicant against the conviction and sentence under the Section 394 r/w Sections 398 &75 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The accused was arrested on the spot while attempting a robbery on a knife point- It … of the applicant against the conviction and sentence under the Section 394 r/w Sections 398 &75 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The accused was arrested on the spot while attempting a robbery on a knife
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ali Mehndi Vs. State, Government of Nct Delhi
Supreme Court of India
Aug-27-2002
Criminal
Criminal Law; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 398; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 9
JT2002(8)SC108
ORDER1. The appellant was tried for offences punishable under Sections 393/357 of the Indian Penal Code. 1860 (in short 'IPC'), Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and section 5 of the Terrorists and … alleged to have run away from the scene of occurrence but caught and tried for the offences under Sections 398 of IPC, Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankar Shaiyyam Vs. Collector and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-18-2001
CivilElection
Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 17(4), 21, 21(1), 21A, 36, 36(1) 39, 39(1), 40(1), 40(2) and 130; Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Nirvachan Niyam, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat (Gram Panchayat Ke Sarpanch Tatha Up-Sarpanch, Janapad Panchayat Tatha Zila Panchayat Ke President Tatha Vice-President Ke Virudh Avishwas Prastav) Niyam, 1994; Madhya Pradesh Society Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973; Madhya Pradesh Panchayats (Election Petition, Corrupt Practices and Disqualification for Membership) Rules, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 303, 304B, 305, 306, 312 to 318, 366A, 366B, 373 to 377, 395 to 398, 408, 409 and 458 to 460
2001(5)MPHT466; 2001(3)MPLJ375
XVI, Sections 395 to 398, 408, 409, 458 to 460 of Chapter XVII and Chapter XVIII of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860) or under any Law for the time being in force for the prevention of … XVI, Sections 395 to 398, 408, 409, 458 to 460 of Chapter XVII and Chapter XVIII of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860) or under any Law for the time being in force for the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahendra Kumar Vs. Director General Prisons and ors.
Rajasthan
May-27-2005
Criminal
Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 - Rules 9 and 14; Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Act - Sections 14; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 121 to 140, 216A, 302, 303, 311, 328, 332, 364, 386, 387, 388, 389, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 413, 455, 458, 459 and 460; Constitution of India - Article 226
RLW2005(4)Raj2255; 2005(3)WLC694
393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 413, 455, 458, 459 and 460 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.Unless they have undergone (one fourth) of the sentence including remission and the Superintendent of Jail recommends the … been annexed as (Annexure-R1). It is then pleaded that since the petitioner was also convicted under Sections 395/396 IPC; parole to him would be prohibited under Rule 14 of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askincable Net (Andhra) Limited and ors. Vs. Apaksh Broadband Ltd. and or ...
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-18-2008
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10(1), 10E, 10E(4C), 10E(4D), 10E(5), 10E(6), 10F, 46, 235 to 250, 254, 291, 293, 397, 398, 402 and 403; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 29, Rule 1; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Company Law Board Regulations, 1991
[2008]142CompCas892(AP)
them shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). Section 10E(5) of the Act adumbrates an important principle of judicial adjudicative resolution. It is to … 69 of 2006, before the Company Law Board (CLB), Additional Principal Bench, Chennai. It was under Sections 397, 398, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956, (the 'Act', for brevity) alleging mismanagement and oppression by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnugraha Jewellers Ltd. and anr. Vs. K.R.S. Mani and ors.
Chennai
Dec-17-1999
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397, 398, 402 and 403; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 477A
[2002]111CompCas501(Mad)
which was registered in Crl. No. 28 of 1996 in City Crime Branch, under Section 477 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The complaint against K.R. Loganathan and his two sons is regarding misappropriation of Rs. 3 crores. It … which was registered in Crl. No. 28 of 1996 in City Crime Branch, under Section 477 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The complaint against K.R. Loganathan and his two sons is regarding misappropriation of Rs. 3 … per cent, shares in Anugraha Jewellers Ltd. They filed the petition under Sections 397, 398, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956, alleging certain
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. and anr. Vs. R.S. Gupta, H.J.S., Special Judge (D.A.A.)
Allahabad
Aug-03-2002
Constitution
Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1956 - Rules 3 and 19; Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 22; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190, 190(1), 195, 195(1) 340 and 350; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 166, 167, 175, 176, 216A, 302, 303, 304, 307, 308, 325, 326, 327, 329, 331, 333, 363, 364, 365, 368, 369, 386, 387, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 402 and 511; Uttar Pradesh Dacoity Affected Areas Act, 1983 - Sections 2, 3, 5 and 19
(2003)1UPLBEC312
any of the following sections of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), namely, Sections 193 to 196 (both inclusive) Sections 199, 200, 205 to … held guilty the Educational Authorities of the State after holding an Enquiry of committal of alleged offences under Indian Penal Code, Section 340 Cr PC and even guilty of committal of Contempt of Court Act and decided to make … 364, 365, 368, 369, 386, 387, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 402 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code.14.2. Under Section … letter dated 6.6.1997 the non-furnishing of which constitutes committal of offences under Sections 166, 167, 175 and 176 IPC and Section 340 Cr PC and under the Contempt of Court Act, which are punishable offence, hence they
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThirumali Kumar Vs. State
Kerala
Feb-03-2010
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 44, 70, 72, 73, 74, 77, 78, 78(1), 79, 82, 82(1), 82(4), 83, 87, 174A, 190 and 439; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304, 364, 367, 380, 382, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 402, 436, 449, 454, 460, 461; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment), 2005; ;Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act, 2005; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 83(1)
2010(1)KLT579
436, 449, 459 or 460 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), and such person fails to appear at the specified place and time … in C.C. No. 2168 of 2004 are under Sections 454 and 380 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the accused persons committed theft of gold ornaments from the house of the de … in C.C. No. 2168 of 2004 are under Sections 454 and 380 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the accused persons committed theft of gold ornaments from the house of … Section 302, 304, 364, 367, 382, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 402, 436, 449, 459 or 460 of the Indian Penal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »