Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian penal code ipc 1860 sections 381 · Page 1 of about 221 results (0.069 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 21 2007

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-21-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 381; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3) and 397

Reported in : AIR2007SC2522; 104(2007)CLT683(SC); (2008)1GLR155(SC); 2007(8)SCALE628; (2007)6SCC156; 2007AIRSCW4499

Police Station which was registered as ICR No. 22/99 for the offence punishable under Section 381 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') by the Court Officer. The Investigating Officer, Nadiad Town Police Station, Nadiad could … allowed. Criminal - Investigation - Power of - Magistrate - Section 381 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 156 and 397 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Court called for 'muddamal', bag containing 'muddamal' could not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2006

State of A.P. Vs. S. Narasimha Kumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-13-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 70, 120B, 381, 411 and 414; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 258(2), 306(2), 309(2), 377, 378, 386(1), 394, 404, 411A(2), 417, 431 and 562; Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2006SC2924; 102(2006)CLT542(SC); 2006CriLJ4090; [2006(4)JCR46(SC)]; JT2006(6)SC358; 2006(3)KLT505(SC); RLW2006(4)SC3283; 2006(7)SCALE97; (2006)5SCC683

A- 2, A-3 etc. A-1 was charged with offences punishable under Sections 381, 411 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC'); A-2 to A-11 and A-15 were charged with offences punishable under Sections 120-B and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2007

Gulzar Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-04-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4 and 12; General Clauses Act - Sections 8(1); Enforcement of Probation Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379, 380, 381, 404 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 360, 360(10) and 361

Reported in : AIR2008SC383; JT2007(1)SC219; 2007(1)SCALE28; 2007(1)LC0077(SC); 2007(1)SCC619; (2007)1Crimes117(SC); (2007)1SCC(Cri)395(SC); 2007LawHerald(SC)188.

Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench. The appellant was found guilty of offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years for stealing an … committed an offence punishable under Section 379 or Section 380 or Section 381 or Section 404 or Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code or … conclusion about commission of offence punishable under Section 379 IPC. Additionally it was submitted that the effect of Sections 3 and 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (in short the 'P.O. Act') in the background

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 02 2001

Commandent 20 Bk. Itb Police Vs. Sanjay Binjola

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-02-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 - Sections 10, 16(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 250, 386, 377 and 378; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3 and 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304A, 379, 380, 381, 404 and 420

Reported in : AIR2001SC2058; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)850; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1022(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)197; 2001CriLJ2349; 2001(2)Crimes277(SC); JT2001(Suppl1)SC400; 2001(3)SCALE637; (2001)5SCC317; [20

punishable under Section 379 or Section 380 or Section 381 or Section 404 or Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), or any offence punishable with imprisonment for not more than two years, or with fine, … of Probation of Offenders Act should not normally be afforded in respect of the offences under Sections 304A IPC when it involves rash or negligent driving. These are instances for showing how the nature of the offence

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2008

Ranbir Singh Vs. the State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-29-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 397 and 401; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 279, 304A, 379, 380, 381, 404 and 420; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1) and 6; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 155(2008)DLT614

punishable under Section 379 or Section 380 or Section 381 or Section 404 or Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), or any offence punishable with imprisonment for not more than two years, or with fine, … order of the Metropolitan Magistrate, sentencing the petitioner to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two months under Section 279 IPC, with a fine of Rs. 500/-; and rigorous imprisonment for one year with fine of Rs. 2, 000/- … in this matter to the reduction of sentence and/or the benefit of Sections 3 and 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958. 4. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2002

Bom Bahadur Thapa Vs. United Commercial Bank

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-08-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 381

Reported in : 2002VIIIAD(Delhi)574; 96(2002)DLT801; (2002)IIILLJ1011Del

stated that the accused was not guilty and was acquitted of the charges under Section 381 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The deposition in the case was not relied, as one of the witnesses had not stated … of the accused. Accordingly the accused is held not guilty and acquittedof the charged offence under Section 381 IPC.'4. Thus though the expression used is that 'the benefit of doubt tilts in favor of the accused' the … the accused is held not guilty and acquittedof the charged offence under Section 381 IPC.'4. Thus though the expression used is that 'the benefit of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2005

West Bengal State Electricity Board Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-02-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 192, 194, 195, 120, 120(1), 120(2), 200, 201(1A), 220, 220(2), 221, 234A, 234B, 234C and 246; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 381

Reported in : (2005)198CTR(Cal)122,[2005]278ITR218(Cal)

event, which may or may not actually occur. But this decision was dealing with Section 381 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in order to interpret 'shall also be liable to fine' interpreting the same as discretionary. This decision … event, which may or may not actually occur. But this decision was dealing with Section 381 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in order to interpret 'shall also be liable to fine' interpreting the same as discretionary. … the amount defaulted. Dr. Pal contended that interest payable in terms of Sections 234A, 234B and 234C where the statute used the expression 'liable to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1980

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Jasbhai and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-27-1980

Subject : ExciseCriminal

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 9(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 151; Constitution of India - Article 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 260, 377(2), 386 and 461; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379, 380 and 381

Reported in : 1981(8)ELT902(MP)

imprisonment for a term exceeding two years;(ii) theft, under Section 379, Section 380 or Section 381 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), where the value of the property stolen does not exceed two hundred rupees;* * * … imprisonment for a term exceeding two years;(ii) theft, under Section 379, Section 380 or Section 381 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), where the value of the property stolen does not exceed two hundred rupees;* … by the Excise Department alleging that they had committed an offence under Section 9(1)(bb) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, (hereinafter referred to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 1996

Hanuman Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-27-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 - Sections 9, 10 and 16; ;Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 14; Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rule 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 3, 4, 4(22), 5, 9, 9(3), 11, 16, 16(2), 26, 122(2), 122(4), 122(5), 194, 200, 200(1), 202, 313, 381, 397, 400 and 465; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 4, 41 and 42

Reported in : 1997CriLJ1054

of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read as under :Section 4 : Trial of offences under the Indian Penal Code and other laws :-(1) All offences under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) shall be investigated, inquired … the Act of 1949 is a Special Law within the meaning of the term defined in Section 41 IPC and therefore by virtue of the effect of Section 5 Cr.P.C. the provisions of the Code of Criminal … of law I am unable to accept this argument of Mr. Verma.4. Sections 4, 5 and 26 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read … that section in respect to the proceeding contemplated by that section. Section 381 provides that an appeal to the court of Session can also be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1989

J. Muthukrishnan and anr., Etc. Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-14-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173(2), 190, 197, 197(1), 227, 306(4)(1), 306(5), 403(I) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 120B, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165A, 166, 167, 168, 169, 182, 193, 197, 198, 201, 204, 211, 218, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 263A, 379, 380, 381, 382, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 403, 406, 407, 408, 409, 411, 412, 413, 414, 417, 418, 419, 420, 465, 466, 467 468, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477A, 489-B, 489-C, 489-D and 489-E; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1), 5(2), 6 and 6(1); Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3, 5, 5(1) and 6; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2570

476, 477A, 489-B, 489-C, 489-D and 489-E of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860). (These offences are not applicable to the State of … instant case do not prima facie disclose any offence whatever having been committed by them either under the Indian Penal Code or under the provisions of the Act, 1947 and in such circumstances, it is nothing but sheer abuse … instant case do not prima facie disclose any offence whatever having been committed by them either under the Indian Penal Code or under the provisions of the Act, 1947 and in such circumstances, it is nothing but … learned X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Madras On 2-9-1987 of alleged offences under Sections 120B read with 420, 477A, 419, 467 and 471, I.P.C. against accused … 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 263A, 379, 380, 381, 382, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 403,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial