Advanced Search Results

Gulzar Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4 and 12; General Clauses Act - Sections 8(1); Enforcement of Probation Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379, 380, 381, 404 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 360, 360(10) and 361

Reported in : AIR2008SC383; JT2007(1)SC219; 2007(1)SCALE28; 2007(1)LC0077(SC); 2007(1)SCC619; (2007)1Crimes117(SC); (2007)1SCC(Cri)395(SC); 2007LawHerald(SC)188.

Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench. The appellant was found guilty of offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years for stealing an … conclusion about commission of offence punishable under Section 379 IPC. Additionally it was submitted that the effect of Sections 3 and 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (in short the 'P.O. Act') in the background

Gurcharan Singh Bhawnani Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 320, 320(9), 321, 357 and 482; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39 and 44; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379; Constitution of India - Articles 142 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 561A

Reported in : 2002CriLJ744; 94(2001)DLT813; 2003(67)DRJ191

Sections 39/44 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 (in short the Act) read with Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, (in short, IPC) and payer was for quashing them as theft bill amounts have been paid.3. Learned

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. G. Annadurai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Reserve Police Fore Act, 1949 - Sections 11(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR2009SC3049; JT2009(6)SC89; 2009(6)SCALE776; 2009(3)SLJ230(SC); 2009(6)LC2594(SC):2009AIRSCW4892

the Officer in charge of Golaghat Police Station alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). P.S. Case No. 257 of 1997 was registered. The respondent was arrested in … `FIR') was lodged before the Officer in charge of Golaghat Police Station alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). P.S. Case No. 257 of 1997 was

P. Venkataramaiah and ors. Vs. the Station House Officer, Chittamur Po ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 155(2), 378, 379 and 482; Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967 - Sections 20, 52, 55, 59, 59(1) and 59(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2003(4)ALT494

Police Station, on the ground that the FIR does not disclose any ingredients of Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC' for brevity) and also on the ground that the alleged offence has been compounded under Section … costs. Criminal - first information report - Sections 155 (2), 378, 379 and 482 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 20, 52, 55, 59, 59 (1) and 59 (2) of Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967 and Section 482

Bandrappa Vs. State by Gadigenur Police

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 378, 379 and 420; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 3, 4(1A), 21 and 22; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 70; Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1969

Reported in : ILR2007KAR3190; 2007(3)KLJ183; 2007(4)AIRKarR94; 2007(3)KarLJ183

Gadigenur Police Station, Sandur Taluk, which is registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 379 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 4( 1-A) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to … minerals. Hence, the charge-sheet is filed against him for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 379 of IPC read with Section 4(1-A) of MMRD Act.2-A. Sri S.G. Rajendra Reddy, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner contends;

Shyamal Ghosh Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC)1860 - Sections 302, 201, 379, 411, 34; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC),(CrPC) 1973 - Section 164, 161, 313; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 8

Shyamal Ghosh, were charged with offences under Sections 302, 201, 379, 411 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (for short, the 'IPC'). All these accused were found to be guilty of the offences with which they

Sanjay Gupta and ors. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ElectricityCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 4, 173(2), 468, 468(2), 470, 473 and 482; Indian Electricity Act - Sections 39 and 44; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379

Reported in : 2004CriLJ157; 101(2002)DLT258; 2003(66)DRJ146

and inquired into as mentioned therein. Section 4 of the Code reads thus:-'4. Trial of offences under the Indian Penal Code and other laws.- (1) All offences under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) shall be investigated, inquired … at P.S. Gandhi Nagar foroffences under Section 39 and 44 of the IndianElectricity Act and Section 379 of IPC pending before aMetropolitan Magistrate at Karkardooma Courts.2. The question that arises for determination in this case is whether … charge-sheet filed in the court are quashed. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 482, 4, 468(2)(c), 473--Inherent power of High Court--Quashing criminal proceedings--Cognizance of offence--Limitation--Judicial

Goda Dami and ors. Vs. Gangadhar Das and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 379, 447 Read With 34; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Section 4

Reported in : 1990Supp(1)SCC142

leave granted. Arguments heard.2. Appellants 1-9 have been convicted under Section 379 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for having harvested crops at the instance of respondent 1 Gangadhar Das, the landlord. The only contention … leave granted. Arguments heard.2. Appellants 1-9 have been convicted under Section 379 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for having harvested crops at the instance of respondent 1 Gangadhar Das, the landlord. The … JJ.1. Special leave granted. Arguments heard.2. Appellants 1-9 have been convicted under Section 379 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for

Shyam Babu Vs. State of Uttar.Pradesh. (U.P.)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), (Cr.P.C) 1973 - Section 379

by the High Court. Consequently, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed. [P. SATHASIVAM; Dr. B.S.CHAUHAN, JJ.] Indian Penal Code, (IPC) 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure, (Cr.P.C) 1973 - Section 379 --

S. Arumugam Vs. the Commissioner of Police Madras and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 75, 148, 302, 332, 336, 341, 379, 380, 392, 394, 397, 457 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161

Reported in : 1995CriLJ194

or Chapter XXII of the Indian Penal Code (Central Act XLV of 1860).' Section 2(a)(iii) reads as follows : '2. Definitions. - In this Act, … 12-7-1993 and on that basis holds that offences under sections 341, 336, 392 read with 397, and 506(ii) Indian Penal Code, have been registered against the petitioner. Even at this stage, the detaining authority does not apply its mind … come to adverse notice in five prior crimes registered by B-2, Esplanade Police Station, for offences punishable under sections 379, 506, Part III. 341 and 392, IPC, crime period ranging between October, 1992 and June, 1993. The first