Advanced Search Results

Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81, 83

are allowed. [ P. SATHASIVAM; JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e),

Chandran @ Manichan @ Maniyan, and ors. Vs. State of KeralA.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 326, 328, 201, 299, 300, 304, 307 Read with Section 34 ; Kerala Abkari Act, 1955 - Sections 55(a)(g)(h)(i), 57A, 58, 8 ; Cochin Abkari Act ; Madras Abkari Act ;

for assisting this Court. We dispose of all the appeals accordingly. [ V.S. Sirpurkar; Cyriac Joseph, JJ.] - Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B - Punishment of criminal conspiracy -- The accused persons under those Sections were sentenced to … Sessions Judge, Kollam by its judgment dated 16.7.2002 for various offences punishable under Sections 120B, 302, 307, 326, 328 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) as also under Sections 55 (a)

Y. Srinivasa Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 328, 341, 342, 365, 366A and 376

Reported in : 1995(1)ALT(Cri)133; 1995CriLJ1597

14. Appeal allowed. Criminal - kidnapping and rape - Sections 328, 341, 342, 365, 366A and 376 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - four charges on accused - Assistant Sessions Judge found accused guilty of offence punishable under Sections … 14. Appeal allowed. Criminal - kidnapping and rape - Sections 328, 341, 342, 365, 366A and 376 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - four charges on accused - Assistant Sessions Judge found accused guilty of offence punishable

Ma-silamani and Etc. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 328

Reported in : 1996CriLJ189

for consideration and therefore, it is dismissed. 12. Petition allowed. Criminal - habeas corpus - Section 328 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - petition sought to set detenue at liberty - alleged offence was detenue's indulgence in activities prejudicial … for consideration and therefore, it is dismissed. 12. Petition allowed. Criminal - habeas corpus - Section 328 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - petition sought to set detenue at liberty - alleged offence was detenue's indulgence in … therefore, it is dismissed. 12. Petition allowed. Criminal - habeas corpus - Section 328 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - petition sought to set detenue

Joseph Kurian Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 272, 300, 302, 304 and 328; Kerala Abkari Act - Sections 2 (10), 55 and 57

Reported in : AIR1995SC4a; [1994]Supp4SCR122

disposed of. Criminal - intoxication - Section 272 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - in order to establish offence under Section 272 prosecution has to … proceed on the footing that A-4 was then the Manager of the Punalur Depot.7. Section 272 of the Indian Penal Code reads as follows :272. ADULTERATION OF FOOD OR DRINK INTENDED FOR SALE - Whoever adulterates any article of … as follows :22. Accused 1 and 4 were found, guilty of offence punishable under Sections 272 and 328 IPC and Sections 55(a) and 55(i) of the Abkari Act. It is proved beyond reasonable doubt that the 1st

Smt. Phino Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 328

Reported in : AIR1975SC1327; (1975)4SCC119; 1975(7)LC387(SC)

and maintain those under Section 328. Criminal - Causing hurt by poison - Sections 302 and 328 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Appellant charged for poisoning three child - One of child died due to poisoning - Session … and maintain those under Section 328. Criminal - Causing hurt by poison - Sections 302 and 328 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Appellant charged for poisoning three child - One of child died due to poisoning

Kalabai Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 328

Reported in : 2004(3)MPHT51

of IPC is hereby set aside. Criminal - Murder - Circumstantial Evidence - Section 328 and 302 of Indian Penal Code,1860(IPC) - Appellant convicted for offence under Sections 302 and 328 of IPC - Hence, present appeal -

State of M.P. Vs. Munnibai and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 328

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4692; JT2008(10)SC376; 2008(12)SCALE543; (2008)10SCC305; 2008AIRSCW6455

for alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 302 and Section 328 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC'). The accused persons were found quilty and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and … the village and the same was forwarded to Saikheda Police Station on the basis of which offence under Sections 328 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code was registered.4. During the course of investigation, dead body of Tirath

In Re: Vokkaligara Yengtappa

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 162 and 162(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24 and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 328

Reported in : AIR1952Mad535; (1952)1MLJ62

Procedure Code, 1898, Sections 24 and 27 of Evidence Act, 1872 and Sections 300, 302 and 328 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appellant challenged conviction under Section 302 - accused poured arsenic into cooked curry which caused death … statement made by an accused person, and resolved a difference of opinion on this point held by the Indian Courts, the representative judgment taking the opposite view being that of Rankin J. in 'Azimuddy v. Emperor', 54

Koli Gator Sura Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 10, 24, 34, 96, 100, 102, 103, 300, 302, 304, 323, 324, 326, 328, 425, 426 and 447; Evidence Act - Sections 105; Cattle Trespass Act, 1871 - Sections 10

Reported in : AIR1966Guj221; 1966CriLJ994; (1966)0GLR357

323, 324, 326, 328, 425, 426 and 447 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 105 of Indian Evidence Act and Section 10 of Cattle Trespass … at about 12 noon on 27-7-1963 for an offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. All the accused came to be acquitted in respect of the charge under Section 302 read with Section … at about 12 noon on 27-7-1963 for an offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. All the accused came to be acquitted in respect of the charge under Section 302 read … of private self-defence5. With regard to the first part of the version, Sections 10 and 24 of the Cattle Trespass Act were referred to by