Advanced Search Results
Raman Kumar Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
Apr-24-2009
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986
2009CriLJ3034; JT2009(8)SC422; 2009(6)SCALE335; 2009AIRSCW3598; 2009(4)LHSC2266
co-accused persons who faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC')3. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:Suman Bal (hereinafter referred to as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPathan HussaIn BashA. Vs. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution and o ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-16-2012
Criminal
Indian Penal Code(IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B, 498A; Evidence Act - Section 113-B, 2, 4
LW-16, the Sub- Inspector of Police. The FIR was registered under Section 304B and Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the “IPC”). Thereafter, investigation was conducted by one Shri P. Devadass, LW-17. He inspected the … faced the trial and were convicted by learned Sixth Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur for committing an offence under Sections 498A and 304B IPC.6. They were committed to the Court of Sessions, Guntur Division, Guntur for such an
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDharam Chand Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-05-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 432; Constitution of India - Article 161
AIR2009SC1304; II(2008)DMC843SC
burnt in bath room. First Information Report was lodged being FIR No. 81 under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).6. The accused were arrested. Usual investigation was made and charge was framed. The accused pleaded not … deceased Anju Devi lying burnt in bath room. First Information Report was lodged being FIR No. 81 under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).6. The accused were arrested. Usual investigation was made and charge
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hazarilal Vs. State of M.P.
Supreme Court of India
Jun-20-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A
JT2007(9)SC566; 2007(8)SCALE555
mother Smt. Sumatrani faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The learned second Additional Sessions Judge, Sagar, in Sessions Case No. 125 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD.K. Ganesh Babu Vs. P.T. Manokaran and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-23-2007
Criminal
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 46(1), 437, 437(3), 438 and 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B
AIR2007SC1450; 2007CriLJ1827; I(2007)DMC340SC; JT2007(3)SC572; 2007(3)SCALE445; (2007)4SCC434
and the accused-respondent Nos. 1 to 3 apprehended arrest for the alleged offence under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961(in short the 'Act').3. The … Court of Session or High Court, he shall be released immediately on bail without being sent to jail.7. Sections 438 and 439 operate in different fields. Section 439 of the Code reads as follows:439. (1) A High
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmbika Mandal Vs. the State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
Supreme Court of India
Nov-28-2008
Criminal
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 3 and 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 306
JT2008(13)SC493
Sessions Judge, Santhal Pargana, Dumka, convicting the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 304B and 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short `the IPC') and also under Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (in short
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinesh Seth Vs. State of N.C.T. of Delhi
Supreme Court of India
Aug-18-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304, 304B, 304B(1), 306, 325, 335, 406, 407 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 215, 221, 221(1), 221(2), 222, 222(1), 222(2), 222(3), 313, 464, 464(1), 464(2) and 465; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 225, 232, 535 and 537; Evidence Act - Sections 113A; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2
2008(56)BLJR2791; 2008CriLJ4345; 153(2008)DLT535(SC); JT2008(9)SC67; 2008(11)SCALE470
against the judgment of Delhi High Court whereby the appellant was acquitted of the charge under Section 304B Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') but was convicted under Section 498A IPC and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment.2. The … is charged, under Section 407 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) with criminal breach of trust in respect of property entrusted to him … who had also reached the house of the appellant and on that basis a case was registered under Sections 304B/306/498A read with Section 34 IPC. On the next day, Dr. Bharat Singh (PW-21) conducted post mortem. He found
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Srinivasulu Vs. State of A.P.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-10-2007
Criminal
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Evidence Act - Sections 113B and 114; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304B and 498A; Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act, 1983; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986
AIR2007SC3146; II(2007)DMC693SC; (2008)149PLR321; RLW2008(1)SC770; 2007(11)SCALE12; 2007AIRSCW5697
High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). Sentence of seven years was imposed on each count. By the impugned judgment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKaliyaperumal and anr. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Supreme Court of India
Aug-27-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304B, 306 and 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986
AIR2003SC3828; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)682; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)337; 2003(51)BLJR1851; 2003CriLJ4321; JT2003(7)SC392; 2003(6)SCALE707; (2004)9SCC157; 2004(1)LC3(SC)
1. The appellants who were found guilty of offences punishable under Section 304B and Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam, unsuccessfully challenged the conviction before the Madras High … inserted in the respective statutes by Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act, 1983. It is to be noted that Sections 304B and 498A, IPC cannot be held to be mutually inclusive. These provisions deal with two distinct offences. It
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaldev Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
Aug-04-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304B and 498A; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3 and 4; Evidence Act - Sections 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313
AIR2009SC913; JT2008(8)SC690; 2008(11)SCALE120; 2008AIRSCW8241; 2008(4)LH(SC)2929
had convicted both, the present appellant and Surjit Kaur for the offence punishable under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') and had sentenced each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and … PW.5 were to the effect that the demand of dowry was made just before the deceased committed suicide.8. Sections 304B and Section 498A read as follows:304-B. Dowry Death- (1) Where the death of a woman is caused by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »