Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian penal code ipc 1860 sections 304a · Page 1 of about 518 results (0.072 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 06 2012

State of Punjab Vs. Balwinder Singh Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-06-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304A, 337, 279,; Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act 27 of 1870 - Section 304A, 229, 300; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Section 4

Reported in : (2012)2SCC182; AIR2012SC861

Ist Class, Amritsar as upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar under Sections 304A, 337 and 279 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short `IPC').3) Brief facts:(a) On 30.10.1992, one Dhian Singh-the Complainant (PW-3), after attending the last rites

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 2004

Shankar Narayan Bhadolkar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-09-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 6, 34, 76 to 106, 201, 299, 300, 302, 304 and 304A; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 25(1A); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR2004SC1966; 2004(1)ALD(Cri)1020; 2004CriLJ1778; JT2004(3)SC211; 2004(3)SCALE78; (2005)9SCC71; 2004(2)LC861(SC)

They were charged for commission of offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). Appellant was alternatively charged for commission of offence punishable under Section 302, 201 … element of culpability to bring home accusations of Section 302. At the most it was covered by Section 304A. Finally, it was submitted that even if the prosecution version is accepted in its toto, the case would

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 2007

Prabhakaran Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-21-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 299, 300, 302, 304 and 304A

Reported in : 2007ACJ2178; AIR2007SC2376; JT2007(9)SC346; 2007(3)KLT400(SC); 2007(8)SCALE605; 2007AIRSCW4227; (2007)3Crimes146(SC); 2007ACJ-IV-2178(SC); 2007LawHerald(SC)2120.

impugned order the appellant was found guilty of the offence punishable under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short IPC). Learned Sessions Judge, Kozhikode, had convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under Section … cause the death. It was submitted that case is covered under Section 304A IPC. Same was not accepted. So, it was held that this is … act done in all probability will cause death. The provision is directed at offences outside the range of Sections 299 and 300 IPC. The provision applies only to such acts which are rash and negligent and are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 11 2008

Manish Jalan Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-11-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Fatal Accidents Act, 1855; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 279 and 304A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 320, 320(9), 357, 357(1), 357(3) and 431; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 545

Reported in : 2008ACJ2349; AIR2008SC3074; 2008(2)ALD(Cri)499; 2008CriLJ3941; JT2008(7)SC643; 2008(6)KarLJ228; 2008(3)KLT390(SC); RLW2008(3)SC2374; 2008(9)SCALE814; (2008)8SCC225; 2008AIRSCW5160; 2008ACJ2349; (2008)3SCC(Cri)456; 2008(6)AIRKarR45

D.K. Jain, J.1. Leave granted.2. The sole appellant stands convicted under Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short `IPC') for the offence of driving on public way so rashly or negligently as to … on appraisal of the evidence, both the courts below have found the appellant guilty of the offence under Sections 279 and 304A, IPC.4. Mr. U.U. Lalit, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that having regard

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 2007

State of Rajasthan Vs. Chittarmal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-21-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 299, 300, 302 and 304A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : JT2007(9)SC261; 2007(8)SCALE659

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench altering conviction of the respondent from one punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') to Section 304A IPC. Two years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. … the act done in all probabilities will cause death. The provision relates to offences outside the range of Sections 299 and 300 IPC. It applies only to such acts which are rash and negligent and are directly

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 2007

Naresh Giri Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-12-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 28, 279, 299, 300, 302, 304, 304A, 325, 323 and 337

Reported in : 2008ACJ300; 2008(1)ALD(Cri)145; 2008(3)ALT(Cri)68; JT2007(12)SC433; 2007(4)KLT1115(SC); RLW2007(4)SC3485; 2007(13)SCALE7

relation to the offences punishable under Section 302 and alternatively under Section 304, 325 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). Questioning correctness of the charges framed, the revision petition was filed. It was … act done, in all probabilities, will cause death. This provision is directed at offences outside the range of Sections 299 and 300 IPC. Section 304A applies only to such acts which are rash and negligent and are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2009

State of Karnataka Vs. Muralidhar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-16-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 71, 279, 299, 300, 304A and 338

Reported in : 2009ACJ1526; AIR2009SC1621; 2009(57)BLJR1232; JT2009(4)SC108; RLW2009(4)SC3010; 2009(4)SCALE35; (2009)4SCC463; 2009(3)LC1228(SC); 2009AIRSCW2540; 2009(2)LHSC1377; 2009(4)KCCR2303; 2009ACJ1526

respondent. The respondent faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 279, 338, 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') by learned IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Mangalore. For the offence punishable under Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2008

Kuldeep Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-16-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 185; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 279, 299, 300, 304A, 337 and 338

Reported in : 2008ACJ2680; AIR2008SC3062; 2008CriLJ3932; JT2008(8)SC219; 2008(10)SCALE64; 2008AIRSCW5142; 2008(3)AICLR644; 2008(4)LH(SC)2789

J.1. Leave granted.2. Appellant faced trial for offences punishable under Sections 279, 337, 338 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act. 1988 (in short the `MV

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2005

V.D. Chaudhary Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-01-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304, 304A and 338; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 82 and 83

Reported in : AIR2005SC3270; 2005CriLJ3753; JT2005(8)SC101; (2005)12SCC304

Initially, the police registered a case alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 304A and 338 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). After investigation charge sheet was filed under Sections 304 and 338 IPC. Cognizance

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2004

State of Rajasthan Vs. Ikbal Hussen

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-08-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 279, 304A, 337 and 338; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 258, 309, 311 and 482

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD(Cri)868; JT2004(8)SC369; 2004(7)SCALE627; (2004)12SCC499; 2005(1)LC96(SC)

against the respondent for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 279, 337, 338 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), could not be continued indefinitely. The learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gulabpura, Bhilwara,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial