Advanced Search Results
Rohtash Vs. State of Haryan
Supreme Court of India
May-22-2012
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 304-B, 498-A, 201, 304; Code Of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C), 1973 - Sections 313, 161
(2012)6SCC589
11.1.2007 is set aside. The appellant is acquitted of all the charges. [B.S. CHAUHAN; DIPAK MISRA, JJ.] -- Indian Penal Code, (IPC) 1860 - Sections 304-B -- The prosecution in support of its case examined Jiwan (PW.1) complainant, Suresh (PW.2), Fateh
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSoni Devrajbhai Babubhai Vs. State of Gujarat and Others
Supreme Court of India
Aug-28-1991
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Constitution of India - Article 20(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 304-B and 498-A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113-B; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2 and 8
AIR1991SC2173; 1992(40)BLJR286; 1991CriLJ3135; 1991(3)Crimes271(SC); II(1991)DMC392SC; (1992)1GLR189; JT1991(3)SC542; 1991(2)SCALE410; (1991)4SCC298; [1991]3SCR812
Court of Session for trial for an offence punishable under Section 304-B IPC which was inserted in the Indian Penal Code by Act No. 43 of 1986 w.e.f. 19.11.1986. On 29.11.1988, the Learned Magistrate dismissed the petitioner's application holding … 'dowry death' shall have the same meaning as in Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).9. It is clear from the above historical background that the offence of dowry death punishable under Section 304-B … offence under this Act non-bailable while continuing it to be non-compoundable. By Sections 10, 11 and 12, amendments were made in the Indian Penal Code,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKulwant Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
Apr-02-2013
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304-B, 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 161
victim.Conclusion:42. There is no merit in the appeal. It is accordingly dismissed. [A.K. PATNAIK; MADAN B. LOKUR, JJ.] Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304-B, 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 161 -- It was firstly submitted that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bansi Lal. Vs. State of HaryanA.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-14-2011
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 498-A, 304-B and 306; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , (CRPC) 1973 - Sections 319, 313
does not have any special features warranting interference by this court. The appeal lacks merit and stands dismissed. Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 498-A, 304-B and 306; Code of Criminal Procedure, (CRPC) 1973 - Sections 319, 313 - Facts
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVadde Rama Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-25-1989
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304-B, 494, 495, 497 and 498; Indian Divorce Act, 1869; Evidence Act - Sections 50; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161
1990CriLJ1666
Divorce Act, 1869 (4 of 1869) or in prosecution under S. 494, 495, 497 or 498 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860)'. In this case, the accused himself has admitted that the deceased was his wife. P.Ws. … S.I., of Police at about 5-00 p.m. on the same day. The crime was registered under Section 304-B IPC. Later P.W. 7 conducted Panchnama in the presence of P.W. 6 and got the dead-body removed with the … of the Evidence Act. Mr. Padmanabha Reddy, the learned counsel submitted that Sections 304-B and 498A, I.P.C. are new incorporations and by oversight the Parliament
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Gopala and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka by Women Police Station, Shi ...
Karnataka
Jul-03-2012
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 498A, 304-B, 34; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 397, 401; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 4
petitioners. Accordingly the petition is allowed and the bail granted by the Magistrate stands restored. [ANAND BYRAREDDY, J.] Indian Penal Code, (IPC) 1860 - Sections 498A, 304-B, 34; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 397, 401; Dowry Prohibition Act,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Appasaheb Balajee Parkhe and Others
Mumbai Aurangabad
Jan-15-2015
Criminal
No.254/1994 thereby acquitting respondents / accused of the offences punishable u/ss.302, 498-A and 304-B r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Facts leading to the prosecution of respondents - accused can be summarized thus: [a] Informant PW-1 Bhagwat … noted that the expression “soon before her death” used in the substantive Sections 304-B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 113B of the Indian … demand of dowry is Sinequanonfor bringing home the guilt for the offence punishable under Section 304-B of the IPC, 1860. As such, let us scan the evidence of prosecution in order to establish whether, it is proved that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhupinder Singh and ors. Vs. Jarnail Singh and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-13-2006
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 158, 161, 167, 167(2), 170, 173, 173(2) and 173(5); Punjab Borstal Act, 1926 - Sections 5; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 302, 304B and 386; ;Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 11; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 173(1)
AIR2006SC2622; 2006CriLJ3621; II(2006)DMC334SC; JT2006(6)SC619; 2006(4)KLT460(SC); 2006(4)MPHT327; 2006(7)SCALE79; (2006)6SCC277
(1) R Cri 107, and Nadeem Ahmed v. State holding that in relation to Section 304(B) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') period of 60 days of remand would be applicable and not 90 days … essence was that since challan was not filed in time, they were entitled to bail in terms of Section 167(2)(a)(ii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the 'Cr.P.C.'). Learned Magistrate rejected the application stating
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnokhe Lal and Another Vs. State
Delhi
Feb-23-2000
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 304-B and 498-A
2000IIIAD(Delhi)200; 84(2000)DLT538; I(2000)DMC314
where the sentence for major offence had already been awarded to the accused under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, then no separate sentence should be awarded under Section 304-B of the Codeb) The case questioned whether … State 1 (1994) CCR 36, a Division Bench of this Court has held that Sections 302 and 304-B IPC are not mutually exclusive if in a case materials on record suggest commission of offence under Section 302
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKodam Gangaram and Others Vs. State of A.P.
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-17-1998
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304-B and 498-A
1999(2)ALD465; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)561; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)497; 1999CriLJ2181
Sessions Judge, Karimnagar, under winch accused No. 1 has been convicted for the offence under Section 304-B of Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years and further convicted for the offence under Section 498-A … dying declaration - Section 32 of Evidence Act, 1872 and Sections 304-B and 498-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - deceased committed suicide on account of continuous harassment by accused - dying declaration of deceased recorded by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »