Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian penal code ipc 1860 sections 302 · Page 1 of about 12,130 results (0.158 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 03 2008

Daya Nand Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-03-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 299, 300, 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : AIR2008SC1823; 2008CriLJ2975; JT2008(5)SC336; RLW2008(4)SC3346; 2008(6)SCALE62; 2008AIRSCW2515

and Haryana High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') in terms of the judgment dated 9/10.10.1997 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hissar.3. … Courts losing sight of the true scope and meaning of the terms used by the legislature in these sections, allow themselves to be drawn into minute abstractions. The safest way of approach to the interpretation and application

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2007

Virendra Kumar Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-16-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 to 306; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 82, 83, 161, 222, 222(1), 222(2), 313 and 464

Reported in : 2007(2)SCALE103; (2007)9SCC211; 2007AIRSCW854; 2007CriLJ1435; (2007)3SCC(Cri)120; (2007)1Crimes370(SC); JT2007(2)SC452; 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)377;

by the appellant in part by setting aside his conviction for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and instead convicting him for offence punishable under Section 306 IPC. He was … there is no merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed. Criminal - Conviction - Circumstantial evidence - Sections 302 and 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Appellant convicted for commission of offence under Section 302

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2008

Bijoy Das Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-28-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : (2008)2CALLT13(SC); 2008CriLJ1808; JT2008(2)SC123; 2008(2)SCALE62; (2008)4SCC511; 2008AIRSCW1034; 2008(4)SCC511; (2008)2SCC(Cri)449; 2008CriLJ1808; 2008(1)Crimes305; 2008(2)LH(SC)922.

conviction and sentence of the appellant who was found guilty of offence punishable under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. 3. Prosecution case in a nutshell

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 12 2006

Bablu @ Mubarik HussaIn Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-12-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 85, 149 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 354(3), 360, 361 and 366; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 367(5) and 562; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1955; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1974

Reported in : AIR2007SC697; 2007CriLJ1160; 2006(14)SCALE15; 2007AIRSCW369; (2007)2SCC(Cri)590; (2007)2Crimes62(SC); 2007LawHerald(SC)464

confirming the death sentence awarded to the appellant for commission of offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The trial Court had imposed a death sentence and, therefore, made a reference … under rarest of rare category to warrant death sentence - Appeal dismissedCriminal - Intoxication - Defence of - Sections 85 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Held, defence of drunkenness can be availed of only

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2007

Sunder Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-07-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 299, 300, 302, 304, 307, 323 and 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 60

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3281; JT2007(6)SC451; 2007(6)SCALE649; (2007)10SCC371; 2007AIRSCW3240

the subject matter of challenge. The appellant was found guilty of offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), while the co-accused Laxmi Narain was found guilty of offence punishable under Section … of the circumstances, conviction modified to be under Section 304 part I of the IPCCriminal - Murder - Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 -Culpable homicide whether amounting to or not amounting to murder - Determination

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2006

Pappu Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-11-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 294, 300, 302, 304, 307, 323 and 506(2)

Reported in : AIR2006SC2659; 2006CriLJ3640; JT2006(6)SC308; 2006(7)SCALE24; (2006)7SCC391

Court, Indore Bench. By the impugned judgment conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') and sentence of RI for life and fine of Rs. 500/- imposed by the … Dr. Deepak Mayeriya (PW-9). On completion of investigation, the charge-sheet was filed indicating commission of offences punishable under Sections 302, 294/34 and 506(2)/34 of the IPC against the appellant and other accused persons.4. The accused persons denied the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2013

Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-22-2013

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81, 83

are allowed. [ P. SATHASIVAM; JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e),

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2007

Smt. Shakuntala Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 60; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304B, 307 and 498A

Reported in : AIR2007SC2709; 2007CriLJ3747; II(2007)DMC202SC; JT2007(9)SC433; 2007(9)SCALE423; (2007)10SCC168; 2007AIRSCW4895; (2007)3Crimes265(SC)

Haryana High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and sentence of imprisonment for life as awarded by the learned Sessions Judge, … Judge, Rohtak in Sessions Case No. 31 of 1997. 2. The appellant was charged for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 304B and 302 IPC. The trial Court found the accused guilty of offence punishable under Section 302

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2008

State of A.P. Vs. Guvva Satyanarayana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-24-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 498A

Reported in : AIR2009SC101; 2009CriLJ376; II(2008)DMC755SC; RLW2009(1)SC574; 2008(12)SCALE808

called as the `accused'). The accused was convicted for offence punishable under Sections 302 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short `IPC') and sentenced to RI for life and two years respectively and a fine with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 2008

Md. Rafique @ Chachu Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-21-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 299, 300, 302, 304, 307 and 398

Reported in : 2008(6)LHSC4219

by the impugned judgment upheld the conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') while setting aside the conviction under Section 398 IPC as done by learned … Courts losing sight of the true scope and meaning of the terms used by the legislature in these sections, allow themselves to be drawn into minute abstractions. The safest way of approach to the interpretation and application

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial