Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian penal code ipc 1860 sections 212 · Page 1 of about 417 results (0.083 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 02 1994

Aleem Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-02-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 212, 302, 392 and 411; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 223 and 482

Reported in : 1994(2)ALT(Cri)408

is, therefore, dismissed. 20. Petition dismissed. Criminal - concurrent trial - Sections 212, 302, 392 and 411 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 223 and 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - petition filed under Section 482 to … him till the final adjudication against A. 1 to A. 4 for charges under Sections 302 and 392, IPC in Sessions Case No. 20/1994, on the file of the III Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. 2. The substance

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2002

Shivasubramanyam Vs. State Through Chamarajanagar East Police Station

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-30-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438 and 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 212 and 216A

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1998; 2002(3)KarLJ280

Procedure Code, 1973 and Sections 34 and 212 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - petitioner arrested by police for offences punishable under Section 212 read … Crime No. 100 of 2001 for the offences punishable under Section 212 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the course of investigation a voluntary statement was obtained from the petitioner. In that statement he has … Crime No. 100 of 2001 for the offences punishable under Section 212 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the course of investigation a voluntary statement was obtained from the petitioner. In that statement

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 17 1991

Niranjan Ojha Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jun-17-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 212

Reported in : 1992CriLJ1863; 1991(II)OLR115

1990. which have been disposed of separately. The appellant was tried and convicted Under Section 212 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 1PC).2. The facts as alleged by the prosecution stated in brief, are that one Ashok … have been disposed of separately. The appellant was tried and convicted Under Section 212 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 1PC).2. The facts … accused Ashok in his cycle, The appellant faced trial for having committed an offence covered Under Section 212, IPC. The learned trial judge held that evidence of PWs 6 and 7 was sufficient to prove guilt of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 22 1999

Sanjeev Kumar Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-22-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 201, 211, 212 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : AIR1999SC782; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)322; 1999CriLJ1138; JT1999(1)SC116; 1999(1)SCALE120; (1999)2SCC288; [1999]1SCR217

conspiracy - Sections 120-B, 201, 212 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 313 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - appellant charged under … beyond reasonable doubt as against accused Sanjiv Kumar. On the question of charge under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code Mr. Lalit, learned senior counsel submitted with force that there is hardly any material on record to establish … being disposed of by this common judgment. Appellant Sanjiv Kumar stood charged under Sections 120B, 302 and 201 IPC. Appellant Kamlesh Tyagi stood charged under Sections 120B, 302 read with Section 120B and 201 IPC. Appellant Lekh

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2009

Mohd. Farooq Abdul Gafur and anr.;state of Maharashtra Vs. State of Ma ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-06-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4, 7, 8(1), 8(2), 9, 9(1), 10, 12, 21, 21(1), 25, 25(1A), 25(1B), 27(2), 27(3), 29, 29(1), 35, 39 and 44; Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 2(1), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(4), 15, 18, 18(3), 29 and 29(1); Arms (Amendment) Act, 1983 - Sections 21(1) and 21(2) to 21(6); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 9, 15, 21, 24, 25, 26 and 30; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 15 and 15(2); Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules, 1987 - Rule 15 and 15(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162, 313 and 357; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 52A, 109, 120B, 201, 212, 302, 307, 324, 326, 411, 414 and 424; Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Rules, 1999 - Rules 3, 3(6) and

Reported in : JT2009(11)SC47; 2009(11)SCALE327; (2010)14SCC641; 2010AIRSCW2574; 2011(3)SCC(Cri)867; [2009] 12 SCR 1093

8th September, 1999. The charges were framed against all the aforesaid accused persons under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'the IPC') and the Arms Act. Considering the gravity of the crime and the fact … furtherance of conspiracy and common intention. He was further charged under Section 212 of IPC for harbouring Accused Nos. 5 to 7 in stolen Maruti … All the eight accused persons allegedly being members of organized crime syndicate of Chhota Shakeel were charged under Sections 3(1) r/w 2(e) of MCOCA. They were further charged of conspiring, abetting and facilitating commission of aforesaid crime

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 1995

Samadhan Baburao Khakare and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-03-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 211, 212, 213 and 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 149, 302 and 324

Reported in : 1996(1)BomCR1; (1995)97BOMLR759

Procedure Code, 1973, Sections 211, 212 & 213 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 34, 302 & 324 - Criminal Trial - Charge and … Judgment and order dated 28th January, 1992, for the offence punishable under section 324 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, for causing injuries to Dharma Sitaram Dode (P.W. 12) and Tukaram Totaram, sentencing both the appellants to suffer … Judgment and order dated 28th January, 1992, for the offence punishable under section 324 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, for causing injuries to Dharma Sitaram Dode (P.W. 12) and Tukaram Totaram, sentencing both the appellants

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 1957

Mobarik Ali Ahmed Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-06-1957

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1870 - Sections 3(2); Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881 - Sections 8; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(2), 34, 108-A, 177, 203, 212, 216, 216-A, 236, 415 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 5(1) and 179; Evidence Act - Sections 16, 45, 47 and 88

Reported in : AIR1957SC857; (1959)61BOMLR58; 1957CriLJ1346; [1958]1SCR328

4, 4 (2), 34, 108-A, 177, 203, 212, 216, 216-A, 236, 415 and 420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 5 (1) and 179 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Sections 16, 45, 47 and 88 of Indian … Third Court, Esplanade, Bombay, for the offence of cheating under s. 420 read with s. 34 of the Indian Penal Code on three counts of cheating, viz., the first relating to a sum of Rs. 81,000, the second relating … offence of cheating under s. 420 read with s. 34 of the Indian Penal Code on three counts of cheating, viz., the first relating to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 1952

Kathi Raning Rawat Vs. the State of Saurashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-27-1952

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 183, 189, 190, 212, 216, 224, 302, 304, 307, 323, 335, 341, 344, 379, 382, 384, 389, 392 and 402 ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 5 and 28

Reported in : AIR1952SC123; 1952CriLJ805; [1952]1SCR435; (1952) 1 SCC 215

384 to 389 and 392 to 402 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 (XLV) of 1860) as adapted and applied to the United State of … 1949 for offences alleged to have been committed by him under section 302, 307 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code. On December 20, 1950, he was found guilty of the offences charged against him and was convicted and … 1949 for offences alleged to have been committed by him under section 302, 307 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code. On December 20, 1950, he was found guilty of the offences charged against him and was … and to seven years' rigorous imprisonment under each of the charges under sections 307 and 392, Indian Penal Code, the sentences of imprisonment running concurrently. … - (a) offences under sections 183, 189, 190, 212, 216, 224, 302, 304, 307, 323 to 335,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2002

Abdul Waheed Khan @ Waheed and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-27-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 212, 299, 300, 302, 304, 392 and 411; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1B); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : AIR2002SC2961; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)509; JT2002(6)SC274; (2002)7SCC175; [2002]SUPP1SCR703; 2002(2)LC1298(SC)

of. While the accused-appellants challenged their conviction under Section 304 Part I read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC'), State had taken the stand that accused-appellants should have been convicted under Section 302 … charged with commission of offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 212 IPC, and Section 411 IPC. The accused persons pleaded innocence.5. In order … Courts losing sight of the true scope and meaning of the terms used by the legislature in these sections, allow themselves to be drawn into minute abstractions. The safest way of approach to the interpretation and application

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1991

Mukesh Kr. Aggarwal, Prop. Mahalakshmi Industries Vs. E.S.i. Corporati ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-27-1991

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 212 and 219; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 406 and 409

Reported in : (1999)IIILLJ199P& H; (1992)101PLR20

same kind when they are punishable with the same amount of punishment under the same Section of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or of any special or local law: Provided that, for purposes of this Section , … by the ESI Corporation.2. The prosecution has been launched under Sections 406/409, IPC on the basis that the petitioner was the principal employer of the … on that basis. I, however, find that the charge framed against the petitioner suffers from a legal technicality. Sections 212 and 219, Cr. P.C. may be quoted for ready reference :'212, Particulars as to time, place and person.--

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial