Advanced Search Results

Daya Nand Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 299, 300, 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : AIR2008SC1823; 2008CriLJ2975; JT2008(5)SC336; RLW2008(4)SC3346; 2008(6)SCALE62; 2008AIRSCW2515

and Haryana High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') in terms of the judgment dated 9/10.10.1997 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hissar.3.

Virendra Kumar Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 to 306; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 82, 83, 161, 222, 222(1), 222(2), 313 and 464

Reported in : 2007(2)SCALE103; (2007)9SCC211; 2007AIRSCW854; 2007CriLJ1435; (2007)3SCC(Cri)120; (2007)1Crimes370(SC); JT2007(2)SC452; 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)377;

by the appellant in part by setting aside his conviction for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and instead convicting him for offence punishable under Section 306 IPC. He was

Bijoy Das Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : (2008)2CALLT13(SC); 2008CriLJ1808; JT2008(2)SC123; 2008(2)SCALE62; (2008)4SCC511; 2008AIRSCW1034; 2008(4)SCC511; (2008)2SCC(Cri)449; 2008CriLJ1808; 2008(1)Crimes305; 2008(2)LH(SC)922.

conviction and sentence of the appellant who was found guilty of offence punishable under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. 3. Prosecution case in a nutshell … Pradhan also collected the post mortem report and finally, submitted charge sheet against the present appellant both under Section 302 IPC as well as under Section 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (in short 'Arms Act'). The learned

Bablu @ Mubarik HussaIn Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 85, 149 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 354(3), 360, 361 and 366; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 367(5) and 562; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1955; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1974

Reported in : AIR2007SC697; 2007CriLJ1160; 2006(14)SCALE15; 2007AIRSCW369; (2007)2SCC(Cri)590; (2007)2Crimes62(SC); 2007LawHerald(SC)464

confirming the death sentence awarded to the appellant for commission of offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The trial Court had imposed a death sentence and, therefore, made a reference

Sunder Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 299, 300, 302, 304, 307, 323 and 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 60

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3281; JT2007(6)SC451; 2007(6)SCALE649; (2007)10SCC371; 2007AIRSCW3240

the subject matter of challenge. The appellant was found guilty of offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), while the co-accused Laxmi Narain was found guilty of offence punishable under Section

Pappu Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 294, 300, 302, 304, 307, 323 and 506(2)

Reported in : AIR2006SC2659; 2006CriLJ3640; JT2006(6)SC308; 2006(7)SCALE24; (2006)7SCC391

Court, Indore Bench. By the impugned judgment conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') and sentence of RI for life and fine of Rs. 500/- imposed by the

Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81, 83

are allowed. [ P. SATHASIVAM; JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e),

Smt. Shakuntala Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 60; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304B, 307 and 498A

Reported in : AIR2007SC2709; 2007CriLJ3747; II(2007)DMC202SC; JT2007(9)SC433; 2007(9)SCALE423; (2007)10SCC168; 2007AIRSCW4895; (2007)3Crimes265(SC)

Haryana High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and sentence of imprisonment for life as awarded by the learned Sessions Judge,

State of A.P. Vs. Guvva Satyanarayana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 498A

Reported in : AIR2009SC101; 2009CriLJ376; II(2008)DMC755SC; RLW2009(1)SC574; 2008(12)SCALE808

called as the `accused'). The accused was convicted for offence punishable under Sections 302 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short `IPC') and sentenced to RI for life and two years respectively and a fine with … appeal, the High Court set aside the conviction. The High Court found that the charge in respect of Section 302 IPC rests on dying declaration purportedly to have been made by the deceased at 5.40 a.m. on 12.4.1994.

Md. Rafique @ Chachu Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 299, 300, 302, 304, 307 and 398

Reported in : 2008(6)LHSC4219

by the impugned judgment upheld the conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') while setting aside the conviction under Section 398 IPC as done by learned