Advanced Search Results

Venu @ Venugopal and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 390, 392 and 395

Reported in : AIR2008SC1199; 2008(1)ALD(Cri)652; 2008(56)BLJR1010; 2008CriLJ1634; JT2008(1)SC656; 2008(3)KarLJ1; 2008(2)SCALE129; (2008)3SCC94

Judge of the Karnataka High Court holding the appellants guilty of offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and sentencing each of 10 years imprisonment. 2. Prosecution version in a nutshell is … this appeal which is accordingly dismissed. Criminal - Robbery on highway - Conviction - Reduction of sentence - Sections 392, 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Accused persons robbed P.W. 2 and 3 of jewellery and

Niranjan Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 320, 392, 395 and 397

Reported in : AIR2007SC2434; 2007CriLJ3523; JT2007(9)SC33; 2007(8)SCALE546; (2007)10SCC459; 2007AIRSCW4318; (2007)3Crimes97(SC); 2007LawHerald(SC)2021.

appeal filed by the appellants, challenging their conviction for offences punishable under Sections 392 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') in terms of the order passed by the learned Third Additional Sessions Judge, Sagar.

S. Arumugam Vs. the Commissioner of Police Madras and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 75, 148, 302, 332, 336, 341, 379, 380, 392, 394, 397, 457 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161

Reported in : 1995CriLJ194

detention - Sections 34, 75, 148, 302, 332, 341, 379, 380, 392, 394, 397, 457 and 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - detention of petitioner challenged - petitioner detained with a view to prevent him from acting in any

inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu Vs. Balaprasanna

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 392 and 397; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164

Reported in : 2008AIRSCW5600; 2008CriLJ4332; JT2008(8)SC242; 2008(10)SCALE466; (2008)11SCC645; 2008(3)Crimes284; 2008(5)LH(SC)3636; 2008 (11) SCC 64

(hereinafter referred to as the `accused'). The accused was convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. … be consistent with the guilt of the accused but should be inconsistent with his innocence. INDIAN PENAL CODE,1860[C.A.No.45/1860] Sections 300, 392 & 397: [Dr.Arijhit Pasayat & P.Sathasivam, JJ] Murder and robbery -Accused, a student in need of

Ajay Bind vs.state Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Vihar under Sections 323/302/34/174A of the IPC is modified to one under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Order on sentence 63. As noted above, by a common order on sentence dated 29th March, 2016, on … AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :07. h June, 2017 Judgment Pronounced on :7th July, 2017 + CRL.A. 392/2016 AJAY BIND ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Sachin Agarwal, Adv. along with the appellant produced in custody. versus

Dilawar Singh Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 8(2), 23,23B and 23(3); Sea Customs Act - Sections 19; Prevention of Corruption Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304, 392, 395, 397, 398 and 452; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 147, 154, 154(3), 155, 155(3), 156, 156(3), 169, 173, 190, 190(1), 200, 202, 202(1), 204, 210, 304, 342, 448 and 465

Reported in : AIR2007SC3234; 2007(2)BLJR2828; 2007CriLJ4709; JT2007(10)SC585; 2007(10)SCALE556; 2007(2)LC1108(SC); 2007AIRSCW5899; (2007)3Crimes388(SC)

by the appellant and affirming his conviction for offences punishable under Sections 452, 392 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and sentencing him to undergo one year, two years and seven years rigorous imprisonment

Lalliram and anr. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342, 376, 392 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 378

Reported in : [2008(4)JCR123(SC)]; JT2008(10)SC67; 2008(12)SCALE491; (2008)10SCC69; 2008AIRSCW6046; 2008(10)SCC69; 2008(4)Crimes99; 2008(6)Supreme472; 2008(5)LH(SC)3704

Chaturbhuj faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 376, 392, 342 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). The trial Court directed acquittal of all the three accused persons. In appeal filed

Rameshbhai Chandubhai Rathod Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 302, 363, 366, 376, 392 and 397; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235(2), 313, 354(3), 366, 367, 368, 369 and 370; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 21 and 141

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR1573; (2009)3GLR2319(SC); JT2009(6)SC161; 2009(6)SCALE469; 2009(4)LC1885(SC); 2009AIRSCW3391; 2009(5)SCC740

The accused was found guilty for offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376, 397 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). He was sentenced to 7 years, 10 years, imprisonment for life, 7 years and … Gracy and for robbing her of her jewellery worn by her -- MOs 1 to 3, under Section 392. The deceased meekly went with the accused from the Convent on account of the misrepresentation made that her

Akil Alias Javed. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 392, 34, 354, 411, 376; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 313, 231, 230, 309

when the inquiry or trial relates to an offence under Sections 376 to Section 376 D of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), the inquiry or trial shall, as far as possible, be completed within a period of … before us confirmed the conviction of the appellant for offences under Section 302 as well as under Section 392 read with Section 34 IPC.2. The genesis of the case of the prosecution was that one Shama Parveen

Vijay @ Rinku vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Sessions Case No.114/2010 arising out of FIR No.532/2007, registered at PS Mukherjee Nagar under Sections 364/392/302/201/411/120B/202/216 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter Crl.A.1341/2012 Page 1 of 89 referred to as “IPC”) whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence