Advanced Search Results
Kamesh Panjiyar @ Kamlesh Panjiyar Vs. State of Bihar
Supreme Court of India
Feb-01-2005
Criminal Family
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304B and 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113A, 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983
AIR2005SC785; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)575; 2005(1)BLJR311; 2005CriLJ1418; I(2005)DMC321SC; JT2005(2)SC218; (2005)2SCC388; 2005(1)LC390(SC)
suffer from any infirmity to warrant interference.16. The appeal is dismissed. Criminal - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 30, 304B and 498A - Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113A, 113B , 114 - Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 … Single Judge of the Patna High Court upholding his conviction for offences punishable under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), while reducing sentence to seven years rigorous imprisonment from ten years imprisonment as was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShanti Lal Vs. State of M.P.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-08-2007
NarcoticsCriminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 18, 27, 27(2), 56, 57, 57(1), 58, 58(1), 59, 60, 65 and 65(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 40, 41, 42, 63 to 70 and 304; Towns Nuisances Act (Madras), 1889 - Sections 3 and 3(10); Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923; Bihar Wakfs Act, 1947 - Sections 58; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 29, 30, 30(1) and 33; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 33
2007(2)BLJR2814; 2008CriLJ386; JT2007(12)SC1; 2008(1)KLT503(SC); 2008(1)MPHT1(SC)
of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 63 to 70 of the of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Accused-Appellant found to be in possession of … following order;Delay condoned.The Trial Court passed the judgment and order dated 2.11.1997 convicting and sentencing the accused under Sections 8 and 18 of the NDPS Act of rigorous imprisonment of 10 years and fine of Rs.1 lakh,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRandhir Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
Oct-12-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 34 and 306; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Muslim Personal Law
AIR2004SC5097; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)1024; 2004(8)SCALE689; (2004) 13 SCC 129; 2004 Cri LJ 4985
3 years in each case.15. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. Criminal - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 30, 34 and 306 - Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Section 2 - Prosecution of appellant 1 husband and … who faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') was upheld though sentence in respect of appellant No. 2 was reduced. While the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M. Yadaiah Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-18-1995
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161 and 313
1996(1)ALD485; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)434; 1996(1)ALT(Cri)242; 1996(1)APLJ213; 1996CriLJ1456; II(1996)DMC209
accused-appellant are set aside. 9. Appeal allowed. Criminal - accidental death - Sections 30, 304B and 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 161 and 313 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - deceased found dead in well - appellant
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjiv Vs. State
Delhi
Sep-11-2009
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 113B; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304, 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 174, 176 and 374; Muslim Law
164(2009)DLT459
passed in Sessions Case No. 135/1997, whereby the appellant husband of the deceased was convicted under Section 498A/304B Indian Penal Code, 1860 and order of sentence dated 30.01.2002 whereby the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 … members of the appellant were acquitted by giving them benefit of doubt but the appellant was convicted under Sections 498-A and 304 Indian Penal Code, 1860 and was sentenced to RI for 7 years and fine. Aggrieved
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinesh Vitthal Patil and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Delhi
Jun-22-2011
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 110(e)(g), 111; Mumbai Police Act - Sections 37(1)(3), 135; Maharashtra Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 1995 - Section 3
148, Acquitted RCC/404/08 1860 149, 452, 353, Dt.30/10/09 332, 427, 504, 506 Mumbai Police Act. 37(1)(3)/135 4. 19/2008 Indian Penal Code 1860 143, 147, 341, Acquitted RCC/427/08 504, 506 Dt.17/7/09 Mumbai Police Act 37(1)(3)/135 5. 12/2010 Indian Penal Code 153(1)(B) … Writ Petition was posted for final hearing. 2. The Petitioners are challenging the notices issued to them under Sections 110(e)(g) & 111 of Criminal Procedure Code. Both the notices were issued on 6th September, 2010. Copies of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKaliyaperumal and anr. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Supreme Court of India
Aug-27-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304B, 306 and 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986
AIR2003SC3828; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)682; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)337; 2003(51)BLJR1851; 2003CriLJ4321; JT2003(7)SC392; 2003(6)SCALE707; (2004)9SCC157; 2004(1)LC3(SC)
1. The appellants who were found guilty of offences punishable under Section 304B and Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam, unsuccessfully challenged the conviction before the Madras High Court. … 1. The appellants who were found guilty of offences punishable under Section 304B and Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') … inserted in the respective statutes by Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act, 1983. It is to be noted that Sections 304B and 498A, IPC cannot be held to be mutually inclusive. These provisions deal with two distinct offences.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Srinivasulu Vs. State of A.P.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-10-2007
Criminal
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Evidence Act - Sections 113B and 114; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304B and 498A; Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act, 1983; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986
AIR2007SC3146; II(2007)DMC693SC; (2008)149PLR321; RLW2008(1)SC770; 2007(11)SCALE12; 2007AIRSCW5697
High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). Sentence of seven years was imposed on each count. By the impugned judgment conviction … Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). Sentence of seven years was imposed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAfzalkhan @ Babu Murtuzakhan Pathan Vs. State of Gujarat
Supreme Court of India
May-17-2007
Criminal
Arms Act - Sections 25(1), 25(1), 27 and 29; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 15; Evidence Act - Sections 25, 26, 30 and 32(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120(B), 120B, 121, 121(A), 122 , 123 and 147
2007CriLJ3223; (2007)2GLR2283; JT2007(7)SC200; RLW2007(4)SC2989; 2007(7)SCALE365; (2007)9SCC387
about 4.4.2003 for commission of an alleged offence under Section 120(B), 121, 121(A), 122 and 123 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 25(1)(b), 25(1)(c), 27 and 29 of the Arms Act in the D.C.B. Police Station, Ahmedabad. The … could not be taken into consideration even for the purpose of Section 30 of the Indian Evidence Act. It is not necessary to examine that … Punjab : 1994CriLJ3139 . Therein inter alia the validity of provisions in regard to the exceptions made to Sections 25 and 26 of the Indian Evidence Act by reason thereof had been upheld. At this stage, it
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.S. Krishnan and anr. Vs. State of Kerala
Supreme Court of India
Mar-17-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 24, 25, 26, 34, 120B, 201, 409, 420, 463 to 471 and 477A; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958
2004(2)BLJR849; 2004CriLJ2833; JT2004(3)SC461; 2004(3)SCALE362; (2004)11SCC576
charge sheet was filed indicating commission of offence punishable under Sections 120B, 466, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') read with Section 34 IPC. The case was tried by the Special Court for … Kerala on merit, they entered into a criminal conspiracy along with A-3 and A-4 on some day between 30.6.1980 and 10.10.1980 for forging a mark list showing higher marks and pursuant to such conspiracy A-4 in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »