Advanced Search Results

Japani Sahoo Vs. Chandra Sekhar Mohanty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 114, 115, 131 and 132; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 160, 161, 294, 323, 324, 325, 336, 341, 427, 448, 491, 500 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156, 156(3), 202, 204, 466-473 and 482; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21

Reported in : AIR2007SC2762; 2007CriLJ4068; 2007(4)CTC740; JT2007(9)SC471; 2007(3)KLT760(SC); 2007(9)SCALE400; 2007(2)LC941(SC)

quashed criminal proceedings initiated against the respondent- accused for offences punishable under Sections 294 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC').3. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a complainant who

Chakradhar SwaIn Vs. Maheswar Barik and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 294, 339 and 341

Reported in : 1994(I)OLR176

petitioner, for allegedly having committed offences punishable Under Section 341 and 294 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short. 'IPC')- The learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nayagarh did not accept the prosecution allegations, and directed … on the basis of an information lodged by the present petitioner, for allegedly having committed offences punishable Under Section 341 and 294 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short. 'IPC')- The learned

Siyaram and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 141, 148, 149, 294, 324 and 326

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2071; JT2009(4)SC116; 2009(4)SCALE162; (2009)4SCC792; 2009AIRSCW2409; 2009(3)LHSC1652; 2009CriLJ2071; 2009(2)SCC(Cri)602; 2009(4)KCCRSN233

148, 149, 294 read with Sections 149, 326 read with Sections 149 and 336 read with Section 149 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).3. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:On 28.6.1994 complainant Ramniwas, his brother Om Prakash and Radheshyam

Rama Nava Nirman Samithi, Hyderabad Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 294-A

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2620

fails and it is dismissed, No costs. 11. Petition dismissed. Criminal - authorisation - Section 294 A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - State Government directed that lotteries not organised by Government of India or State Governments shall not be … Tamil Nadu. The G.O. made it clear that any contravention of the order will be dealt with under Section 294-A of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The petitioner claims to have been authorised by the State of

Zafar Ahmad Khan Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 294

Reported in : AIR1963All105; 1963CriLJ273

without force.10. Next it has been urged that in order to hold an accused guilty under Section 294, Indian Penal Code there should be proof of annoyance to the person who is the aimed victim of the obscene act … 1. The applicant Zafar Ahmad Khan, resident ofQasba Sandila, district Hardoi, has been found guilty of anoffence under Section 294, I. P. Code, and has been sentenced to three months' rigorous imprisonment by a Magistrate first class,

Mahendra Kumar Mishra Vs. Chandra Shekhar Prasad Mishra and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973/1974 - Sections 200, 204, 244, 245, 245(2), 253(2) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 294, 323 and 506; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 3 and 4

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3455; 2001(4)MPHT125

petition is dismissed.12. Misc. Criminal Case dismissed. Criminal - Charge - Sections 294, 323 and 506 (Para-II) of Indian Penal Code 1860 (IPC) and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Petitioner made allegations on respondents for

Govindan, Vs. Represented by Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC) 1860 - Sections 294(b), 323 and 324, 341; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 397, 401

C.C.No.216 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, Kallakurichi is modified. [C.S.KARNAN, J.] Indian Penal Code(IPC) 1860 - Sections 294(b), 323 and 324, 341 -- No material evidence was produced. The first accused

Somesh Das Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 438; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 294 and 506; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1) and 18

Reported in : 2004CriLJ680; 2004(2)MPHT17(CG)

Anticipatory Bail - Imposition of Ban - Sections 294 and 506 of Indian Panel Code, 1860(IPC), Sections 3(i)(x) and 18 of the Scheduled Castes and … State of servitude. These offences constitute a separate class and can not be compared with offences under the Penal Code. Therefore, Section 18 of the Act which excludes the provision of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Criminal … the Cr.PC, apprehending arrest in Crime No. 88/2003, Police Station, Surajpur, District Sarguja, of the offence punishable under Sections 294 and 506 of the IPC and Section, 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)

Munchu @ Debananda Banchor Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 294, 302, 304 and 321; Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1) and 3(2)

Reported in : 2006(I)OLR808

Appeal is dismissed. Criminal - Corroboration of evidence - Sections 294, 302, 304 Part I and 325 of Indian Penal Code, 1860(IPC) and Section 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Appellant was

Jaiveer Prasad Gautam and Another Vs. State of U.P. Through the Princi ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1956. - ; Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1956 - Rule 3(2), 14; Indian Penal Code,1860, - Section 294, 292 (2); Constitution of India, - Article 226; U.P. Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 - Rule 7 (2) (3), 4

and grab those whose minds are open to such immemorial offences. Section 294 of the Indian Penal Code,1860, provides that whoever, to the annoyance of … performed or orated by the youths on a public platform. 21. As per Section 292 (2) of the Indian Penal Code,1860, any pamphlet, paper, writing, drawing, painting, representation, figure or any other object, shall be deemed to be obscene, … be permitted in which dance and songs are performed in the manner which arouse the feelings of certain sections of the employees, especially the women employees, who may feel offended in attending such programmes. 19. The learned