Advanced Search Results

Kuber Chandra Das Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 366A and 376

Reported in : 2004CriLJ4776; [2004(2)JCR88(Jhr)]

a consented sexual intercourse between them and as such no offence under Sections 366A and 376 of the Indian Panel Code is made out against the appellant. The further contention on behalf of the appellant is that there is

State of Maharashtra Vs. Rajendra Jawanmal Gandhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354, 376 and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) -, - Sections 222; Bombay Children Act, 1948 - Sections 57; Criminal Laws (Amendment) Act, 1983; Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act, 1983

Reported in : 1997(2)ALD(Cri)490; 1997(45)BLJR1644; JT1997(8)SC43; 1997(6)SCALE80; (1997)8SCC386

granted,2. Rajendra Jawanmal Gandhi (the accused) was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Satara for offences under Section 376 Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 57 of the Bombay Children Act, 1948 for having committed rape on a … Surgeon, Kolhapur, who, it would appear under intense public pressure, formed a panel of three private doctors to again examine the prosecutrix. The panel examined … to Ragale Park at Kolhapur at about 9.30 A.M. on September 24, 1986, thus committing offences punishable under Sections 376 I.P.C. and 57 of the Bombay Children Act.10. In support of the charge the prosecution examined as many

Manpyare and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363, 366, 375 and 376

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3046; 2002(1)MPHT253; 2002(2)MPLJ11

Matched in: Advocate Surendra Singh, Sr. Adv. Raj Kumar Verma, Panel Lawyer

Kirtiwas and Etc. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363, 366, 376, 376(2), 342 and 506B

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2829

Testimony of Prosecutrix - Corroboration of - Benefit of Doubt - Sections 342, 363, 366 and 376(2)(g) of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Appellants convicted for offence under Sections 342, 363, 366 and 376(2)(g) of IPC … did not place any reliance thereon during arguments.12. On the other hand, Shri U. K. S. Chandel, learned Panel Lawyer while arguing in support of the impugned judgment contended that presence of semen and spermatozoa on the

Raj Kumar Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Sessions Judge, Sidhi in S.T.No.82/1996, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under section 376 of IPC and sentenced for 7 years' rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.2,000/-. In default of payment of fine, one … Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Sankalp Kochar, counsel for the appellant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 28th day of … husband and no crime was committed with her.17. The appellant cannot be convicted for the offence punishable under sections 376 or 354 of IPC. The learned Additional Sessions Judge erred in convicting the appellant for the offence punishable … (Police Station Waidhan, District Sidhi). Due to power cut, -:- 2 -:- Criminal Appeal No.2328 of 1996 the working of thresher was stopped and therefore,

Vijaysingh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 154; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 342, 354, 376, 376(2), 452, 506-B and 506-II

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT136

Matched in: Advocate Jai Singh, Adv. A. Salim, Panel Lawyer

Bhanu Pratap Singh Thakur Vs. the State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Criminal

VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh ...Respondents ! Shri Sunil Sahu Advocate for the appellant ^ Shri Ajit Singh Panel Lawyer for the respondent CORAM: Honble Mr G Minhajuddin J Dated:06. 12/2012 : Judgement JUDGMENT (Passed on 06th … Sessions Trial No. 195/2001, convicting the appellant for the offences punishable under section 363, 366 and 376(1) of IPC and sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment of 4 years, 5 years and 7 years respectively and in addition, … of March, 2012) CRIMINAL APPEAL UNDER SECTION 374 2) OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE.1. This appeal has been filed against the judgment of conviction and order … as the impugned judgment.4. So far as conviction of the appellant under sections 363 and 366(A) of the IPC is concerned, counsel for the appellant

Laloo @ Latif Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Gupta. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of counsel for the parties: Shri A.K. Jain, counsel for the appellant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on 8th day of October, 2012) The appellant has preferred this … other accused persons, but convicted the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366 & 376(1) of IPC and sentenced him as mentioned above.5. I have heard the learned counsel for both the parties at length.6. … 1 Cr. A. No.2324/1996 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.2324/1996 Lallu @ Latif Ahmad Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kamal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 323, 376 and 377; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 154 and 313

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT169

appellant.15. Criminal Appeal allowed. Criminal - Conviction - Benefit of Doubt - Sections 323, 376 and 377 of Indian Penal Code, 1860(IPC) - Appellant convicted for offence under Sections 323 and 376 of IPC by trial court … case of the appellant.7. Having heard the counsel for the appellant and panel lawyer appearing for the State, this Court is of the considered view … by IV Additional Sessions Judge, Dewas (Smt. Sharmishtha Dave) thereby convicting the appellant for the offence punishable under Sections 376 and 323 of IPC in Session Trial No. 5/99 and sentencing him 7 years RI and 6 months

Abdul Jalil Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376, 451, 506 and 606;; Offence Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 45, 114A, 134 and 154;; Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 21;; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 313;; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114A

Reported in : (2001)1CALLT177(HC)

of the learned trial Judge in respect of the offence punishable under sections 451 and 506 of the Indian Panel Code we do not like to interfere with such findings as arrived by the learned trial Judge. On perusal … was set in motion, investigation commenced and it ended in a charge sheet disclosing offence punishable under sections 376/451/506 of the Indian Penal Code.3. The charge sheet having been submitted before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate,