Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian panel code sections 328 363 366 and 376 · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.037 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 13 2004

Satbeer Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-13-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Panel Code - Sections 328, 363, 366 and 376

Reported in : 114(2004)DLT487

is quashed. Appellant is on bail. The bail bond and surety bond are discharged. Criminal - rape - Sections 328, 363, 366 and 376 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - conviction Order under Sections 363, 366 and 328 challenged - absence of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 2017

Hans Kumar vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-12-2017

Subject : Criminal

2017 CRL.A. 403/2014 HANS KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Aditya Vikram, Delhi High versus Court Legal Services Committee’s Panel Advocate STATE CORAM: ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Rajender Singh … % (ORAL) Impugned judgment of 26th October, 2013 holds appellant guilty for committing offences under Sections 328/363/366/376/506(II) of IPC and vide order of 28th October, 2013, appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years with … October, 2013 holds appellant guilty for committing offences under Sections 328/363/366/376/506(II) of IPC and vide order of 28th October, 2013, appellant has been sentenced to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 2017

Pawan Kumar @ Deepu vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-12-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

737/2014 PAWAN KUMAR @ DEEPU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Aditya Vikram, Delhi High versus Court Legal Services Committee’s Panel Advocate STATE Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Additional ..... Respondent Public Prosecutor for State with SI Pardeep CORAM: HON'BLE … ORDER % (ORAL) In this appeal, appellant has been held guilty for the offences under Sections 363/366/328/376/506 of IPC vide impugned judgment of 27th March, 2014 and vide order of 29th March, 2014, he has been sentenced … appellant has been held guilty for the offences under Sections 363/366/328/376/506 of IPC vide impugned judgment of 27th March, 2014 and vide order of 29th

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial