Advanced Search Results
Mr. Avinash S/O Mr. Suresh Vs. State of Karnataka, by Secretary to Gov ...
Karnataka
May-12-2011
Land Acquisition
regard. We have to refer to Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 3 of the Indian Majority Act, 1875 and Sections 361 and 363 of the Indian Penal Code. 10. According to respondent No.6, the date of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Narinder Pal Kaur Chawla Vs. Shri Manjeet Singh Chawla
Delhi
Sep-20-2007
Family
Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 18, 18(2) and 20; Indian Majority Act, 1875; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 11, 16 and 25; Hindu Marriage Act, 1995; Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113B; Dowry Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304B, 494 and 498A; Hindu Law; Mohammedan Law; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 33, Rule 1; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 125
AIR2008Delhi7; 148(2008)DLT522; I(2008)DMC529
means. Explanation: For the purposes of this Chapter-(a) 'minor' means a person who, under the provisions of the Indian Majority Act, 1875 is deemed to have attained his majority; (b) 'wife' includes a woman who has been divorced by, or … year 1956. As on that date Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was already in force, which contains provision like Section 5 regarding void marriages. If 'second wife', though her marriage is void under the Hindu Marriage Act, was to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Azeez Vs. Pathumma Bi
Chennai
Nov-15-1951
FamilyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 32, Rule 1; Majority Act, 1875 - Sections 2
AIR1952Mad754; (1952)1MLJ463
will be no order as to costs here and in the court below. Indian Majority Act (IX of 1875), Section 2 (a)--Scope of --Code of Civil Procedure (Act V of 1908), Order XXXII, Rule 1-Muslim woman--Minor under the … arises for consideration in this civil revision petition is whether the plaintiff, who is a minor under the Indian Majority Act but who is a major according to her personal law, is entitled to bring a suit for dissolution … who (although a major according to the personal law of the lady) is still a minor under the Majority Act, 1875 is not competent to relinquish the whole or part of her dower to change its character". The Bench … my notice. In 'Usman Ali Khan v. Mt. Khatoon Banu', 17 Luck 572 relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner it has been
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rajasekhar Vs. Siddalingappa
Karnataka
Jul-29-1986
Civil
Indian Majority Act, 1875 - Sections 3; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 8, 8(3) and 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , Order 40
ILR1986KAR2765
would in law, attain majority after completing the age of 21 years as per Section 3 of the Indian Majority Act, 1875.17. Though it is seen that some dispute has been raised in regard to the date of birth of … guardian. On 27-42-1958 she once again sold item Nos. II(a) and (b) of 'A' Schedule properties to defendants 5 and 6 for a sum of Rs. 12,000/-, in the very capacity as described in Ex. D. 32.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLakhwinder Singh Vs. Miss Paramjit Kaur
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-19-2003
ContractProperty
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 5 and 7; Indian Majority Act, 1875; Contract Act, 1875 - Sections 2, 10 and 11; Guardian and Wards Act, 1890
AIR2004P& H6; (2003)135PLR837
No. 1 would not be a person competent in law to contract. According to the provisions of the Indian Majority Act, 1875 every minor before joining the age of 18 years has to be looked after by his guardian and … Therefore, no valid title could be transferred within the meaning of Sections 5 and 7 of the 1882 Act. The appeal is thus without any … ORDERM.M. Kumar, J.1. This is defendant's appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity the Code) challenging concurrent findings of facts recorded
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjit Datt Vs. Mrs. Ethel Walters (Decd.) Through L.Rs. and Others
Allahabad
Sep-28-2000
Family
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 4, 15(1), 18, 24, 25, 29, 29(1) and (2), 36, 37 to 40 and 47; Indian Succession Rules, 1925 - Rules 6 and 39; Adoption of Children Act, 1926 - Sections 1(1) and 2, 3 and 5(2); Adoption of Children (Amendment) Act, 1949; Adoption Act, 1976 - Sections 39(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 50, 57(1); Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 12; Punjab Laws Act, 1872 - Sections 5 and 7; Oudh Estate Act, 1869; Sri Pratap Jammu and Kashmir Laws Consolidation Act, 1977; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 21 and 372; Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887; Indian Majority Act, 1875; General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 3(57); Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 - Article 16(1); International
2000(4)AWC3270
the introductory passages of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Bill in which it has been stated thus : 'Indian Majority Act. 1875, exempted adoption from the purview of it s provisions while Indian Succession Act. 1925, specifically recognised the Hindu … on August 4, 1926. I will only refer to sub-section (1) of Section 1 and sub-section (2) of Section 5, which are relevant.'I. (1) Upon an application in the prescribed manner by anyperson desirous of being authorised to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKaruppaiah Vs. Karthick
Chennai Madurai
Nov-29-2016
Land Acquisition
minor only till he attains the age of 18 years, without taking into consideration the amendment to the Indian Majority Act, 1875 found that the age of majority for the purpose of Guardians and Wards Act, will be 21. Hence, … by the provisions of Indian Limitation act with particular reference to Article 58, 59 and 60 of the said Act? d) Without there being a … (Prayer:Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the Judgement and Decree dated 28.02.2012 made in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.M. Jeelani Vs. Shanswar Kulsum and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-17-1992
Criminal
Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 to 128; ;Muslim Law
1993(1)ALT(Cri)171; 1994CriLJ271
of the Code reads as follows : (a) 'minor' means a person who, under the provisions of the Indian Majority Act 1875 (9 of 1875) is deemed not to have attained his majority.' 9. Thus, since the minor daughter is … as maintenance of minor child is concerned. 3. Sri Venugopala Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that Section 5 of the Act is a bar for maintainability of this application. Section 5 of the Act reads as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPriyesh Vasudevan Vs. Shameena
Kerala
Nov-18-2005
Service
Kerala Education Act; ;Kerala Education Rules, 1959 - Rules 51A and 51B; ;Indian Majority Act, 1875 - Sections 3 and 4; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 6, 7 and 8; ;Limitation Act, 1908; ;Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 20; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 7 and 112; ;Transfer of Property Act - Sections 13 and 20; ;Land Reforms Act - Sections 82; ;Kerala Service Act - Sections 4 and 5; ;Kerala Service Rules - Rules 60, 67 and 71; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 187 and 312 to 316; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; ;Hindu Law; ;Civil Law
2005(4)KLT1003
1925, 'minor' is defined under Section 2(e), which reads as follows:'(e) 'minor' means any person subject to the Indian Majority Act, 1875, who has not attained his majority within the meaning of that Act, and any other person who has … Employment Scheme as per G.O.(P)12/99/P&ARD; dated 24.5.1999, which was made applicable to teachers of aided schools under Rule 51B of Chapter XIVA of the Kerala Education Rules. The application was made on 29.11.2000, within two years of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShriniwas Abaji Desai Vs. Damodar Appaji
Mumbai
Sep-12-1945
FamilyLimitation
(1946)48BOMLR244
but it proved infructuous and the darkhast was disposed of on January 31, 1934. The provisions of the Indian Majority Act, 1875, having been adopted by the Jamkhandi State, the respondent attained majority at the age of twenty-one on June … I, therefore, dismiss the appeal with costs and I dismiss the application summarily. Indian Majority Act (IX of 1875), Section 3 - Bombay Court of Wards Act (Bom. I of 1906), -Indian Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections … In the Allahabad full bench case cited above, Oldfield J. observed (p. 501): .the Legislature would appear, - by limiting the operation of the [Indian
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »