Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian majority act 1875 section 1 · Page 1 of about 653 results (0.140 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 12 1945

Shriniwas Abaji Desai Vs. Damodar Appaji

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-12-1945

Subject : FamilyLimitation

Reported in : (1946)48BOMLR244

but it proved infructuous and the darkhast was disposed of on January 31, 1934. The provisions of the Indian Majority Act, 1875, having been adopted by the Jamkhandi State, the respondent attained majority at the age of twenty-one on June … I, therefore, dismiss the appeal with costs and I dismiss the application summarily. Indian Majority Act (IX of 1875), Section 3 - Bombay Court of Wards Act (Bom. I of 1906), -Indian Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections … and is domiciled in that State. He was born on June 29, 1916, and during his minority, the Court of Wards, Jamkhandi, took over superintendence

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 1882

Chunee Mul Johary and ors. Vs. Brojo Nath Roy Chowdhry and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-12-1882

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1882)ILR8Cal967

he executed the mortgage deed.3. In order to determine this question we have first to decide whether the Indian Majority Act (IX of 1875) is applicable. Upon this point the Subordinate Judge says in his judgment: 'It has been … Registration Act (III of 1877), Section 35 - Certificate of Guardianship Act (XL of 1858)--Majority Act (IX of 1875), Section 3. - … decide is, whether Brojo Nath Roy Chowdhry was a major on the 18th of November 1879 when he executed the mortgage deed.3. In order to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1986

Rajasekhar Vs. Siddalingappa

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-29-1986

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Majority Act, 1875 - Sections 3; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 8, 8(3) and 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , Order 40

Reported in : ILR1986KAR2765

would in law, attain majority after completing the age of 21 years as per Section 3 of the Indian Majority Act, 1875.17. Though it is seen that some dispute has been raised in regard to the date of birth of … Nesargi, J.1. The plaintiffs in O.S. No. 182/1964 on the file of the II Additional Civil Judge, Bangalore City have preferred (his appeal against the decree

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 04 1979

Gulam Mustafa Vs. Tahara Begum and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-04-1979

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1980CriLJ124

C.P.C. means a person who has not attained his majority within the meaning of Section 3 of the Indian Majority Act, 1875, where the suit relates to any of the matters mentioned in Clauses (a) and (b) of Section 2 … J.1. The only question that arises for consideration in this revision petition is whether a Mohammadan wife aged 15 years, is entitled to initiate action without a next friend, for maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2008

Shail Kumari Devi and anr. Vs. Krishan Bhagwan Pathak @ Kishun B. Path ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-28-2008

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 117, 125, 125(1), 125(2), 138(2), 145, 147, 167(3), 354, 354(6) and 361; Indian Majority Act, 1875; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 2001 - Sections 125; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2008SC3006; 2008(56)BLJR2598; 2008CriLJ3881; II(2008)DMC363SC; [2008(4)JCR125(SC)]; JT2008(8)SC227; 2008(3)KLT576; 2008(10)SCALE602; (2008)9SCC632; 2008AIRSCW5063; 2008(4)LH(SC)2860

For the purposes of this Chapter, - (a) "minor" means a person who, under the provisions of the Indian Majority Act, 1875( 9 of 1875) is deemed not to have attained his majority; (b) "wife" includes a woman who has … C.K. THAKKER, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeal is filed by appellant No.1-wife and … 21, 1997, the appellants filed a case for maintenance in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as `the Code') (Misc. Case No. 280

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 10 2006

Vishal Nilesh Mandlewala Vs. Justice R.J. Shah (Retd.) Admission Commi ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-10-2006

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961; Indian Majority Act, 1875 - Sections 3; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 4(1), 4(2), 4(3) and 19; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 4 and 6

Reported in : (2007)2GLR1764

Regulation cannot be read so as to laying down a position contrary to the statutory law.17. Under the Indian Majority Act, 1875, Section 3 provides for age of majority of persons domiciled in India. The provision stipulates that every minor of … D.A. Mehta, J.1. This petition has been preferred to challenge the order made by respondent No. 1-committee refusing to grant approval to the admission of the petitioner given by respondent No. 2-college, with a further

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2017

Independent Thought Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-11-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 18 years and not before. It would, however, be pertinent to mention that Section 2 of the Indian Majority Act contains a non-obstante clause excluding laws relating to marriage, divorce, dower and adoption from the provisions of that … so far as children are concerned. W.P. (C) No.382 of 2013 Page 82 20. Section 3 of the Majority Act, 1875 provides that a person shall attain the age of majority on completing the age of 18 years and … sexual intercourse between a man and his wife being a girl between 15 and 18 years of age is rape?. Exception 2 to Section 375

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 1998

Bhagwan Raoji Dale Vs. Sushma Alias Nanda Bhagwan Dale

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-17-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125, 127, 482 and 488; Indian Majority Act, 1875; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10(1) and 25; Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939; Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 18(1)

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR851; I(1999)DMC168

Explanation:- For the purpose of this chapter. (a) 'minor' means a person who, under the provisions of the Indian Majority Act, 1875 is deemed not to have attained majority : (b) 'wife' includes a woman who has been divorced by, … of the 1973 Code, The question really revolves around the interpretation of Clause (b) of the Explanation to sub-section (1) of section 125 of the Code. Section 125 reads as under :'125. (1) If any person having sufficient

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2008

Cholamarakkar Vs. Pathummamma and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-11-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Majority Act, 1875; Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 - Sections 3(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125, 125(1) and 125(1)(C); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 44; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 488 and 488(1); Hindu Law; Mohammedan Personal Law; Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : 2008(3)KLJ429

Explanation - For the purposes of this Chapter,-(a) 'minor' means a person who, under the provisions of the Indian Majority Act, 1875 (9 of 1875) is deemed not to have attained his majority;(b) 'wife' includes a woman who has been … is entitled to maintenance. There cannot be any dispute that the said question can be tackled only under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.To the extent relevant, the provision reads as follows:Section 125: Order … any dispute that the said question can be tackled only under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.To the extent relevant, the provision

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2016

Karuppaiah Vs. Karthick

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Nov-29-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

minor only till he attains the age of 18 years, without taking into consideration the amendment to the Indian Majority Act, 1875 found that the age of majority for the purpose of Guardians and Wards Act, will be 21. Hence, … (Prayer:Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the Judgement and Decree dated 28.02.2012 made in … (Prayer:Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the Judgement and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial