Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian forest act 1927 section 49 · Page 1 of about 81 results (0.049 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 07 2001

Jogender Singh and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Bareilly ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-07-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 16, 17, 20, 27A and 38A; Uttar Pradesh Forest (Amendment) Act, 1965; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 9(1), 9(2), 9A, 9A(2) and 49; Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939; Uttar Pradesh Village Abadi Act, 1947; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 143K, 154, 155, 156, 157, 229B and 241

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC141

No. 41 situated in village Gahloioya, Paragana and Tehsil Powayan, district Shahjahanpur. A notification under Section 4 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. (hereinafter referred to as the Forest Act) was issued by the State Government proposing the area therein to … also, the claims of the parties are decided which claimalso bars any subsequent adjudication as per provisions of Section 49. The dispute under the Forest Act is dispute of claims of land qua declaration of area as reserved

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2007

The State of Jharkhand Through the Divisional Forest Officer, Dhanbad ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-22-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bihar Saw Mills (Regulation) Act, 1990 - Sections 5, 10 13 and 16(2); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 42, 43, 45, 49, 52, 52A, 52B and 59A(2); Evidence Act; Constitution of India - Article 300A

Reported in : [2007(3)JCR503(Jhr)]

responsible for any such loss or damage unless he causes such loss or damage negligently, maliciously or fraudulently.Section 49 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is specific;-Government and its officers not liable for damage to such timber.-The … Mills (Regulation) Act, 1990 is distinct from the criminal prosecution of the respondent under Section 41/42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Section 42 of the Act envisages penalty for breach of rules made under Section 41 of the Act which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2001

Harish Chandra Singh and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ba ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-21-2001

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 9A(2); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 4, 6 and 20; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Article 372

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC562

Plot Nos. 2, 45 and 41 are reserved forest. Notification under Sections 4, 6 and 20 under the Indian Forest Act, 1927, (hereinafter to be referred as the '1927 Act'), has been issued with regard to land recorded as forest … the claims of the parties are decided which claim also bars any subsequent adjudication as per provisions of Section 49. The dispute under the Forest Act is dispute of claims of land qua declaration of area as reserved

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 19 2006

Bombay Environment Action Group and Sameer Mehta Vs. State of Maharash ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-19-2006

Subject : Environment

Acts : Societies Registration Act; Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayat and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 49(3), 195, 313 and 323(1); Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Sections 4, 17, 17(1), 24, 25 and 33A; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 5, 19 and 23; Indian Forest Act, 1927; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972; Mahabaleshwar Municipal Council Act; Building Bye-laws and Development Control Rules; Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling Rules, 2000; Environment Protection Rules, 1986 - Rules 3(3A) and 5(3); Development Control Regulations - Regulations 3 and 64B; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR235; 2007(1)BomCR721

in the forests, both within and outside the municipal areas, shall be governed by the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and Forest Conservation Act, 1980. All activities in the sanctuaries and national parks will be governed by the … (Maharashtra Water Supply Board) are also joined as Respondents therein. The MPCB is a body corporate constituted under Section 4 of the Water Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Water Act'). … come up. It is their duty as the Municipal Bodies under Section 49(3)(j) and (l) of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act (supra) to see to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2004

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Sujit Kumar Rana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-20-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(3), 20, 29, 44(2A), 49(7), 50A to 59G, 62, 63, 67 and 68; Constitution of India - Articles 48A, 51A, 136, 226 and 300A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 6A(2), 6C, 6E and 7(1); Karnataka Forest Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR2004SC1851; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)258; (2004)3CALLT55(SC); [2004(4)JCR137(SC)]; JT2004(5)SC157; 2004(1)SCALE641; (2004)4SCC129

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing a proceeding for confiscation of forest-produce etc. under the provisions of Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') as amended by the State of West Bengal is in question in … S.B. Sinha, J.INTRODUCTION:1. Applicability of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing a proceeding for confiscation of forest-produce etc. under … possession of the property must be held to be implicit. If Section 49(7) is not so construed, it cannot be given effect to.We, therefore, are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 1997

Surma Valley Saw Mill (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jul-25-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : Assam Forest Regulation (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 49

only property in respect of which an offence, is committed can be seized under Section 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. 4. In reply to the afore said submission, Mr. H. N. Sarma, learned, Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam, … vehemently contended that the only power that is available to the authorities to seize the machines is under Section 49 of the Assam Forest Regulation and under the said Section 49 as amended by the Assam Forest Regulation

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2014

Godrej and Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-30-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

for consideration is whether the mere issuance of a notice under the provisions of Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is sufficient for any land being declared a “private forest” within the meaning of that expression as defined … it will be frustrated if what is intended to be inclusive is interpreted to exclude the actual owner.” 49. The proposition was more clearly articulated in Black Diamond Beverages v. Commercial Tax Officer[19]. wherein this Court considered

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 1964

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Abdul Jalil and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-05-1964

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 20; Tripura Forest Act - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR1965SC147; 1965CriLJ128; [1964]8SCR158

respondents in these several appeals were prosecuted before Magistrates in Tripura for offences under s. 26(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and were convicted and sentenced to terms of imprisonment and fine. Their appeals to the learned Sessions Judge, … appeals were prosecuted read : '26. (1) Any person who - (a) makes any fresh clearing prohibited by section 5, or who, in a reserved forest - (d) trespasses or pastures cattle, or permits cattle to trespass; … of these three reserves. The respondents in Appeals 39, 43, 47 and 49 had trespassed into the Garjichhera reserve, while those concerned in appeals 42,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 1987

State of Maharashtra Vs. Arjun Tabadu Mahajan and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-08-1987

Subject : CriminalEnvironment

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 26(1) and 55

Reported in : 1988(1)BomCR603

a complaint before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Shahada, for an offence under section 26(1)(d) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, against 49 persons. In the complaint, he mentioned that the accused persons have permitted their cattle numbering in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Education

w.e.f. 03/01/1977. Earlier, the subject, "Forest" was in Entry 19 of List II i.e., the State List. The Indian Forest Act, 1927 (Central Act), which is a Pre- Constitution statute was in force in British India. It replaced the Indian … & R.2) ***** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION98 OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT1993AND NOTIFICATION DT. 16.8.2008 PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE ON278.2008 VIDE ANNEXURE B DOES … within the legislative -:167. :- competence having regard to the Entries 23, 49, 54 of List II; that even if the levy was not traceable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial