Advanced Search Results

U.R. Mavinkurve Vs. Thakor Madhavsinghji Gambhirsingh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Jagirs Abolition Act - Sections 2(2), 5, 8, 9 and 11; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 10 and 34(A); Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 3(16), 3(17), 3(19) and 40; Bombay Act, 1865; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1965SC1747; [1965]3SCR177

this Act shall in any way affect the right of theState Government to apply the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, as inforce in the pre-Reorganisation State of Bombay, excluding the transferredterritories to forests in a Jagir Village.' ................. … 'Occupancy' to mean a portionof land held by an occupant. Under s. 3(19) of the Code 'Occupation'means possession. Section 40 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code provides asfollows : '40. In villages, orportions of villages, of which the

Rajiv SarIn and anr Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kumaun and Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960 - Section 4A, 18(1)(cc), 19(1)(b), 3(10), 8; UP Amendment Act 1978 ; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 ; Indian Forests Act 1927 - Section 36, 37, 84; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 40; Government of India Act. - Section 76, 107(2); Constitution of India. - Article 254, 31(2), 300A; Punjab Act - Section 10

Learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants raised two contentions in the context of the inter-relation of the Indian Forest Act 1927 and the KUZALR Act; firstly, the case of alleged discrimination in as much as the Central Act i.e. … such acquisition is envisaged in the Act as not public purpose but for the purpose specifically enumerated in Section 40 of the Land Acquisition Act. But, in case of both the aforesaid manner of acquisition of land, the

Shivnath Vs. A.D.J. (Court No. 4) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 4, 6, 9 and 20; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 122B, 122B(4F), 157 and 158; Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Registration Act, 1908; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules - Rule 138

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC808

necessary for adjudicating the controversy raised in the writ petition are ; notification under Section 4 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 was issued on 26.8.1967 notifying various plots including the plots in question proposed as reserved forest. Notification under … 20.12.1958 was given effect to in the revenue records. No entry came on the record in the last 40 years which was also a factor clearly coming against the petitioner's case. The submission of the petitioner that

Thakoreshri Maharasinghji Dolatsinghji and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 3(4) and (16), 40 and 216(2); Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 2, 5(1), 8 and 9; Gujarat Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1972; Indian Forest Act, 1927; Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) (Amendment) Act - Sections 8; Bombay Land Revenue (Amendment) Code, 1936; Bombay Land Revenue (Amendment) Code, 1948

Reported in : AIR1980SC59; (1979)4SCC291; [1980]1SCR290; 1979(11)LC769(SC)

the private forest. Neither it was a reserved forest nor a protected forest within the meaning of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Mr. M.N. Shroff appearing for the State of Gujarat drew our attention to the Gujarat Private Forests (Acquisition) … settlement the person aforesaid could not fall back upon any provision of the Land Revenue Code, such as, Section 40 or Section 41 for claiming a right in the trees. In our opinion the view so expressed by

State of Haryana and ors. Vs. Lal Chand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Sections 22, 27, 28, 34, 58(1), 59 and 60; Punjab Liquor Licence Rules, 1956 - Rule 36(2), 36(3), 36(4), 36(16), 36(22-A), 36(23), 36(23)(1), 36(23)(2), 36(23-A) and 37(8-B); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 299(1); Indian Forest Act, 1927; Forest Contract Rules

Reported in : AIR1984SC1326; 1984(1)SCALE690; (1984)3SCC634; [1984]3SCR715; 1984(16)LC722(SC)

Court in K.P. Chowdhary's, Mulamchand's, Rattan Lal's and Firm Gobardhan Dass's cases, supra, there are provisions in the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and the Forest Contract Rules framed thereunder for entering into a formal deed between the forest contractor and … of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Thereafter certain amendments were made to ss. 40 and 41 of that Act by the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1961. … as also the defaulted instalments of the licence fee payable in respect of a liquor vend issued under Section 60 of the Punjab Excise Act 1914 ('Act' for short).2. Put very shortly, the essential facts are these.

Uma Paliwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15; Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1986 - Rule 4; Rajasthan Forest Act, 1953; Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 18, 19 to 25, 26A, 35 and 66(4); Constitution of India - Article 14; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Wildlife (Protection) (Amendment) Act, 1991; Forest Act, 1927; Forest (Amendment) Act, 1980; Forest Rules, 1981

Reported in : RLW2003(2)Raj1118

area falling within the area declared Under Section 18 is not reserved forest area as declared under the Indian Forest Act. 1927 (for brevity 'old Forest Act'), nor proceedings Under Sections 19 to 25 were pending on the date of … (4) Scale 165), and (2) dt. 10-7-2000 in Naveen M. Raheja v. Union of India, (2000 AIR SCW 4034) (Ann. R5) contended that the area in dispute was declared as 'Reserved Forest' under the Rajasthan Forest Act,

Mohinder Pal Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Kutlehar Forest (Acquisition of Management) Act, 1992 - Sections 1, 4 and 5; ;Constitution of India - Articles 31, 31A, 31A(1), 31A(2), 31C, 39 and 245

Reported in : AIR1995HP15

an officer duly appointed in that behalf by the State Government.' 11. These provisions form part of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 as Sections 80 and 81. They provide for the management of forest either by the Government or by … Before passing of this Act, the State Government issued Notification No. Rev. D(F)7-1/90, dated January 19, 1990, under Section 3 of the Punjab Resumption of Jagirs Article 1957 directing the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests to take

Indirabai Narayan Bivalkar, Deceased Through her L.Rs. and Others Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

dated 21 October 1959 entered into with Bivalkar for management of the subject land under the provisions of Indian Forest Act, 1927 and the same was wrongfully and arbitrarily transferred by Forest Department to Revenue Department on its deforestation and … get because of the difference between the quitrent and the full assessment.”..... 40. MaharanaShri Jayavantsinhji, Ranmalsinhji Vs. The State of Bombay and Ors.(AIR 1959 SC … Bombay Personal Inam Abolition Act, 1952 (for short, “the Inam Abolition Act”) came to be enacted. Provisions of Sections 4, 5, 7, 9, 10 and 17 are relevant. In the year 1957, village was surveyed and the

ishwar Chandra Gupta and ors Vs. State of U.P. and ors

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Section 2, 3, 3A, 3B, 4, 4A, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 13, 13A, 13B, 16, 19 ; U.P. Societies Registration Rules, 1976 - Rule 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19

Authority. The Prescribed Authority has passed the order in exercise of power provided under Section 61-B(2) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (as amended vide The Indian Forest (Uttar Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2000) as well as under Section 34-A of … Court in the case of Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner 2, reported in 1978 (1) SCC 405 has held that the order must be supported with the reasons as the order passed by the public

Kaviraj Ramlal Chaturbhuj Vs. Prant Officer, Dahod Prant and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1984)2GLR1477

record of that case that on 6-7-1956, the State Government issued a notification under Section 34(A) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 declaring all uncultivated lands in the said 39 villages to be forests for the purposes of Ch. 5 … settlement the person aforesaid could not fall back upon any provision of the Land Revenue Code, such as, Section 40 or Section 41 for claiming a right in the trees. In our opinion, the view so expressed by