Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian forest act 1927 section 37 · Page 1 of about 110 results (0.041 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 29 2005

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) and or ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-29-2005

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 4, 10 and 10A; Bihar Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 10(2), 10(4) and 10A; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 8, 9, 16 and 37; Companies Act, 1956; Indian Forest Act, 1927; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2

Reported in : [2005(3)JCR357(Jhr)]

Company Limited and the Divisional Forest Officer, Hazaribagh, wherein formal permission was granted under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, for clearing of the forest lands held in the lease hold areas, including 468.62 acres comprised in villages … lease hold interest in the demised premises to Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited under the provisions of Section 37 of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957.10. Thereafter, as will appear from the materials on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2011

Rajiv SarIn and anr Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-09-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kumaun and Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960 - Section 4A, 18(1)(cc), 19(1)(b), 3(10), 8; UP Amendment Act 1978 ; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 ; Indian Forests Act 1927 - Section 36, 37, 84; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 40; Government of India Act. - Section 76, 107(2); Constitution of India. - Article 254, 31(2), 300A; Punjab Act - Section 10

Learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants raised two contentions in the context of the inter-relation of the Indian Forest Act 1927 and the KUZALR Act; firstly, the case of alleged discrimination in as much as the Central Act i.e. … read with Section 19(1)(b) of KUZALR Act as amended by the UP Amendment Act 1978 are repugnant to Section 37 and Section 84 of the Indian Forests Act 1927, in so far as no compensation is provided for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2010

Maharashtra Land Development Corporation and ors. Vs. State of Maharas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-11-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Bombay Salsette Estate Abolition Act, 1951 - Section 4; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Section 35(3), 6, 2(f), 2 c(i) (ii); Bombay Land Revenue Code - Section 37; Maharashtra Private (Acquisition) Forest Act, 1975

notice was issued by the State Government to the Company under sub-Section (3) of Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 calling upon the Company, the owner of the land, to show cause as to why notification under sub-Section … provided to the appellant-Corporation.24. On behalf of the respondent-State, it was submitted that in the proceedings initiated under Section 37 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, and in the enquiry held in respect of the applicability of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 31 2003

State of Maharashtra and anr. Vs. Maharashtra Land Development Corpora ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-31-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Private Forests Act, 1975 - Sections 2 and 6; Bombay Salsette Estate Act, 1951 - Sections 4; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 35(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR24

notice was issued by the State Government to the Company under sub-section (3) of section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 calling upon the Company, the owner of the land, to show cause as to why notification under sub-section … 3483 was mutated on 1st June, 1965. It was based on order dated 24th December, 1965 passed under section 37 of the Land Revenue Code read with section 4 of Salsette Estate Abolition Act, 1951. The Mamlatdar in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 1989

Parisar an Organisation and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-08-1989

Subject : Environment

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 31(D), 37 and 37(1); Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 48A, 51A and 226

Reported in : 1990(1)BomCR79

of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 were not applicable.The expression 'forest land' had not been defined under the Indian Forest Act, 1927 or under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Section 3 of the Indian Forest Act, however, gives some clue … the, Pune Municipal Corporation directing it to initiate a proposal for minor modification of the development plan under section 37 of the M.R.T.P. Act for converting the suit land from 'No Development Zone' to 'Public and Semi Public

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2006

Samatbhai Punabhai Jhalandra Vs. Mamlatdar and 3 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-12-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Revenue Tribunal Act, 1957 - Sections 9; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 11, 12, 15 and 16; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 37(2), 39A, 43, 46, 47, 51, 61, 79A and 203

Reported in : (2007)IIILLJ195Guj

of Bombay Section 46.Section 47.Section 51.Section 61.Section 79A, except Clause (b) thereof.________________________________________________________________________4 1[***]________________________________________________________________________5 1[***]________________________________________________________________________6 1[***]________________________________________________________________________7 1[***]________________________________________________________________________8 1[***]________________________________________________________________________9 The Indian Forest Act, 1927 (XVI of Section 11.1927) Section 12.Section 15.Section 16.________________________________________________________________________10 The Indian Forest Act, 1927 (XVI of Section 11.1927),as adapted … Appellate or revisionaljurisdiction against ordersor decisions in casesarising under the followingprovisions1 2________________________________________________________________________1 The Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 Section 37, Sub-section (2)(Bom. V of 1879). Section 39A.Section 43.Section 46.Section 47.Section 51.Section 61.Section 79A, except Clause(b) thereof.________________________________________________________________________2 The Bombay

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2008

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-24-2008

Subject : Environment

Acts : Aircrafts Act; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act 1888 - Sections 354A; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 4(1), 9 and 10(1); Cantonment Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5; Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 57; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 141, 226, 227, 245, 246, 246(1), 300A and 372(1); Development Control Regulations, 1991;Evidence Act - Sections 114; Forest Act, 1865 - Sections 34A and 38; Forest Act, 1878; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Government of India Act 1935; Greater Bombay Laws and the Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 1, 2, 2A, 3 to 26, 34., 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3), 35(4), 36, 36A, 36B, 36C, 37 and 38; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11A; Limitat

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

in the individual petitions. The action proceeds on the basis that once notice under Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, hereinafter referred to as '1927 Act', is issued, any land in respect of which such notice has been … that behalf was lacking as is apparent from the reading of Sections 36, 36A to 36C and 37. Section 37 would make this aspect more clear. Section 37 of 1927 Act provides for expropriation of forest in certain

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2014

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-17-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

persons under the guise of protecting forests. Provisions of the Act are violative of the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and Wild Life Protection Act, 1972, hence the provisions of the 2003 Act to take over private properties … Nos.6/2000, 8/2000, 3/2001 and 16/2001. The 2003 Act was passed by the State Legislature and notified on 06.06.2005. Section 1(2) further provided that the 2003 Act shall be deemed to have come into force on W.P(C) No.26691 … 2010, W.P(C) Nos.24819 & 32825 of 2003, W.P(C) Nos.10738, 11110, 30785, 9843, 3795, 7042, 34524, 30930 and 18134 of 2006 W.P(C) Nos.29245, 22661, 29466, 27296,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 1998

Ankush Keshav Bowledkar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-07-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 6, 24, 34-A, 35, 36-A, 36-B, 36-C and 37; Indian Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 35(3) and 38; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 5, Rule 1

Reported in : 1999(1)BomCR165

the Private Forests Act came into force.6. In order to examine the aforesaid question section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (for short 'the Forest Act') is relevant.'35. Protection of forests for special purposes.---(1) The State Government may, by … Act, 1975 (for short 'Private Forest Act') came into force and sections 34-A, 35, 36-A, 36-B, 36-C and 37 stood repealed. The petitioner and owners accordingly approached the Divisional Forest Officer and the Conservator of Forests that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 2001

Star Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-20-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(1) and (2), 37, 43B and 256(1); ;Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 82 and 83; ;Constitution of India - Article 299 and 299(1)

Reported in : [2001]252ITR337(Cal)

royalty payable by the assessee is a statutory liability in view of the provision ofSection 82 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. He further submits that royalty is a tax as per the latest decision of the Supreme Court in … Y.R. Meena, J. 1. On an application under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following questions set out at pages 1

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial