Advanced Search Results

Arun Kumar Agarwal Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : CivilEnvironment

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2005Jhar32; 2004(52)BLJR1003; [2004(2)JCR450(Jhr)]

and without jurisdiction.9. For the aforesaid reason, this writ application is allowed and the impugned notice is quashed. Indian Forest Act, 1927, Section 33 - Confiscation proceeding--Notice for initiation of--Petitioner has not been cutting and removing the trees--Not doing any mischief with

Amar Nath Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33 and 69; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 397, 452, 454, 468, 517 and 648; ;Constitution of India - Article 48A; ;Constitution of India (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : 1990CriLJ506

The facts, in brief, are that the petitioner was prosecuted for an offence under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). He was accused of felling 15 Khair trees unauthorisedly from private area

The State of Bihar and anr. Vs. Kedar Sao and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment) Act, 1990 - Sections 2(3), 2(4), 5, 6, 32, 33(1), 41, 41(1), 42, 42(1), 52, 52(3), 52(4), 52(5), 52A, 52B, 52C, 52D, 53C, 55 and 61; Bihar Forest Produce (Regulation of Trade) Act, 1984 - Sections 1(3), 1(4), 14, 15, 17, 20, 21, 28 and 32; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29(2) and 30; Bihar Timber and other Forest Produce Regulation of Transit Rules, 1973; Bihar Kendu Leaves (Control of Trade) Act, 1973; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 102 and 103; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Fruit Products Order, 1955

Reported in : AIR2003SC3650; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)670; 2003CriLJ4903; JT2003(7)SC276; 2003(6)SCALE639; (2004)9SCC344

applied to the case by virtue of Section 32 of the said Act and the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 stood excluded and consequently the Authorities under the central enactment had no powers to confiscate the vehicle and … and the seizure could be effected after a long chase of the fleeing vehicle for contravention of Sections 33(1), 41(1) and 42(1) of Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment) Act and Section 20 of the Trade Act. Our attention

Anand Kumar Goenka Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Sections 3, 3(2) and 4; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33 and 63; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 4, 4(2), 5, 200 and 245; Madhya Pradesh Transit Rules - Rules 3 and 29; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 41 and 42

Reported in : 2001(3)MPHT252; 2001(3)MPLJ272

appears that the Forest Range Officer, Maihar investigated the offences punishable under Sections 33 and 63 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (for short 'the Forest Act') and the offences punishable under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of … in Criminal Case No. 12/97.2. It appears that the Forest Range Officer, Maihar investigated the offences punishable under Sections 33 and 63 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (for short 'the Forest Act') and the offences punishable

Most. Dulia Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : [2009(1)JCR22(Jhr)]

the Act, though in terms of the provision as contained in Sub-section (5) of Section 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, Confiscating officer is required to arrived at that conclusion. The said provision reads as follows:No order of confiscation … the driver was arrested. The driver failed to produce any document and hence, a case was lodged under Section 33 of the Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment Act, 1990), Act, 1927.3. Subsequently, the matter was referred for initiation of

Gujarat Forest Producers, Gatherers and Forest Workers Union Vs. State ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : EnvironmentConstitution

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; 7A 33(1) and 33C(2) ;Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 2(1) ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 23.3, 39B, 46, 48A, 51A, 141, 166, 298, 309, 310 and 311; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 2; Monopolies and Restrictive trade Practice Act, 1969 - Sections 2; Indian Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 4, 5 and 8

Reported in : (2004)2GLR568; (2004)IIILLJ259Guj

to briefly undertake the exercise in the context of the subject of 'Forest' at Srl.No.1. The Indian Forests Act, 1927 is the law relating to the forests, the transit of forest produce and the duty leviable on timber … The Management of the Indian Standards Institution, reported in (1976) 1 LLJ 33, was referred to point out that it was held that it makes … and the Irrigation Department of the State can be said to be an industry within the meaning of Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 or not ?(2) What is the correct law between the two

Zubair Alam Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

that sides, it would be appropriate to deal with about the legal provisions as laid down under the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Section 52(1) of the Indian Forest Act reads as follows:When there is reason to believe that a forest-offence has … and there is no illegality in the impugned order. It is further alleged that the Criminal case under Section 33, 41 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act was already registered and the truck was seized as it

Smt. Hadiya Begum Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CriminalEnvironment

Reported in : 2008CriLJ2082

stones. A forest case No. 709/18 was registered against him under Section 33, 41 and 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (for brevity 'the Act'). The prescribed authority by order dated 16-10-2001 vide Annexure-P/1 passed an order in exercise

Vijay Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Environment

Acts : Bihar Forest (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 52 and 52(5); Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR256(Jhr)]

the petitioner for the present. It has been informed that a criminal case under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 has been lodged and pending against some of the persons in connection with the incident in question. If

Chandra Prakash Khanduja Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

under Section 379, 411, 414, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 read with Section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that