Advanced Search Results

Narmada Prasad Vs. Rex

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Extradition Act, 1903 - Sections 22

Reported in : AIR1952All451

above remarks the revision is, hereby, dismissed. Criminal - endorsement - Section 22 of Indian Extradition Act, 1903 - absence of extradition proceeding - magistrate … framed under this sub-section which is as follow:'In any proceedings against any person under the provisions of the Indian Extradition Act, 1903, or ofany treaty for the extradition of offenders, the Magistrate, acting in such proceedings and any police officer … be searched and documents seized there from on a warrant issued by a court in Rewa is under Section 2, Extradition Act, No. 15of 1903. Sub-section 2(b) of that section provides that:'The Governor General-in-council may make rules

In Re: K.R.P.L. Chockalingam Chettiar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1960CriLJ1625

Ramaswami, J. 1. On a reference made by our 'learned brother Somasundaram, J. whether Ch. III of the Indian Extradition Act, 1903 continues to be applicable to this case of extradition from India to Ceylon, this Full Bench has been … Section 18 of that Act. This chapter was intended to substitute the Indian Procedure for that contained in Sections 7 to 12 of the Extradition Act. 1870. 16. Section 23 of the Extradition Act, 1870, printed at … being competent to try and punish him, demands the surrender. Similarly in 22 Amjur p. 244, Section 2. It must be distinguished from transportation and

C.P. Matthen Vs. the District Magistrate of Trivandrum

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1939)41BOMLR1119

for the appellants referred to the rules made by the Governor-General in Council, under Section 22 of the Indian Extradition Act, 1903, as to the Procedure of Political Agents for Surrender of Accused Persons to Native States (No. 1862 I.A., … now reported to be residing at Marble Hall, Sterling Road, Nungumbakam, Madras, stands charged with offences punishable under sections 410, 419, 421, 480 and also sections 99 and 104 of the Travancore Penal Code corresponding to sections

Dr. Ram Babu Saksena Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1903 - Sections 7; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 388 and 420; Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 177 and 197

Reported in : AIR1953Raj12

in accordance with the provisions of the Adaptation of Laws Order 1950, which lays down as follows: 'The Indian Extradition Act, 1903 (XV of 1903): Section 1 -- For Sub-section (2) substitute -- (2) It extends to the whole of … Regional Commissioner of Rajasthan, under Section 7 of the Indian Extradition Act XV of 1903. The offences under Sections 388 and 420 Penal Code, (Tonk State) were mentioned in the warrant to have been committed or supposed … learned Government Advocate therefore does not in any way assist his case. 22. Regarding the point whether the accused had any right of asylum vested

Muthu Reddi and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1930Mad981; 129Ind.Cas.626

1873. They argue further that any part or dependency of a Foreign State for the purpose of the Indian Extradition Act a Foreign State to which Chap. II and not Chap. III will apply.3. To take the last point … that the action of the District Magistrate is illegal, inasmuch as he has under the Extradition Act of 1903 no authority to deliver them up in this summary fashion, but must first he ld an inquiry and … of 1815, the necessary legislative sanction for which has been provided by Section 18 of the Extradition Act. The petitioners rejoin that Section 18 has … re Celeste Cullington 63 Ind. Cas. 819 : 48 C. 328 : 22 Cr.L.J. 691, a Single Judge, Mr. Justice Buckland, differed, he lding that

Jugal Kishore More Vs. Chief Presidency Magistrate Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 46, 75 to 86, 186 to 189, 403, 429, 439, 514 and 555; ;Constitution of India - Articles 21, 73, 227 and 394; ;Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3(1), 19, 35 and 37; ;Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881 - Sections 13 and 26; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 3, 4, 120B, 216, 420, 467 and 471

Reported in : AIR1968Cal220,1968CriLJ604,71CWN508

No arrangement was there either between the colony of Singapore and India The Indian Extradition Act, 15 of 1903, was adapted, but not the Fugitive Offenders Act, an Act of the British Parliament, which was left severely … wherever it may be, then proceedings against him under Section 188 bar further proceedings against him under the Indian Extradition Act in respect of the same offence in any territory beyond the limits of India: just the principle of … evincing inter alia-A. endorsement of the self-same warrant of arrest on November 22, 19G5, by Magistrate D. Cons of the Central Magistracy, Hong Kong, to … stage, of Taltola police-station case No. 237 dated May 4, 1962, under Sections 120B/420/467/471 of the Penal Code against Suprokash Mukherjeeand others, before the Chief

In Re: K.R.P.L. Chockalingam Chettiar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1960)2MLJ425

affirmative. Ramaswami, J.8. On a reference made by our learned brother Somasundaram, J., whether Chapter III of the Indian Extradition Act, 1903, continues to be applicable to this case of extradition from India to Ceylon, this Full Bench has been … Section 18 of that Act). This Chapter was intended to substitute the Indian Procedure for that contained in Sections 7 to 12 of the Extradition Act, 187O.25. Section 23 of the Extradition Act, 1870, printed at page … being competent to try and punish him, demands the surrender. Similarly in 22 American Jurisprudence, page 244, Section 2. It, must be distinguished from transportation

Yatindra Kumar Aggarwal and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

as it holds that the Central Government has unfettered power to refuse extradition under Section 3(1) of the Indian Extradition Act, 1903, which, according to the learned counsel, was in pari materia to Section 5 of the said Act. It … another in Jaipur (Rajasthan) and the third one in Agra (U.P.). In Delhi, it was Case No.52/2005 under Sections 21, 22, 23 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as

Himanshu Kulshrestha Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

as it holds that the Central Government has unfettered power to refuse extradition under Section 3(1) of the Indian Extradition Act, 1903, which, according to the learned counsel, was in pari materia to Section 5 of the said Act. It … another in Jaipur (Rajasthan) and the third one in Agra (U.P.). In Delhi, it was Case No.52/2005 under Sections 21, 22, 23 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as

Brij Bhushan Bansal Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

as it holds that the Central Government has unfettered power to refuse extradition under Section 3(1) of the Indian Extradition Act, 1903, which, according to the learned counsel, was in pari materia to Section 5 of the said Act. It … another in Jaipur (Rajasthan) and the third one in Agra (U.P.). In Delhi, it was Case No.52/2005 under Sections 21, 22, 23 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as