Advanced Search Results
O.P. Arora Vs. German Italian Mosul Dam Joint Venture (Gimod-jv)
Delhi
May-21-1992
Civil
Indian Emigration Act, 1922 - Sections II
1992(24)DRJ113
making a report. A fee of Rs. 2500.- will be paid to the local commissioner by the plaintiff. Indian Emigration Act, 1922 - Suit for rendition of accounts and recovery of amount--Plaintiff duly registered recruiting agent under the Indian Emigration … plaint the plaintiff furnished a security deposit to the tune of Rs. 3 lakhs to the Government of India for the due performance of the … India for the due performance of the terms and conditions of the certificate required under the provisions of Section Ii of the Act. This security deposit is still with Government of India. It is the case of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr Baliram Waman Hiray Vs. Justice B. LentIn and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-12-1988
Criminal
Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 5(4), 5(5) and 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3) and 346; Constitution of India - Article 141; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193 and 228; Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 23; Payment of Wages Act - Sections 18; Indian Railways Act - Sections 40
AIR1988SC2267; (1988)90BOMLR434; 1988(3)Crimes655(SC); [1989]176ITR1(SC); JT1988(4)SC265; 1988(2)SCALE688; (1988)4SCC419; [1988]Supp2SCR942; [1989]72STC384(SC)
majority of 3:2 held that the proceedings before an Income-tax Officer under Section 37(4) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 were judicial proceedings under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code and such proceedings must be treated as … Act, 1980, Section 12(3)(d) of the Cine Workers etc. (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1981, Section 37(2) of the Emigration Act, 1983,s.13(5) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Tukkanna
Delhi
Jul-23-1984
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397
1984CriLJ1866; 1984(2)Crimes665; 1984RLR523
that two cases stand registered u/Ss 420/468471/120-B, Indian Penal Code read with Section 25 & 26 of Immigration Act, 1922 at Police Station Palam Airport. They are to the effect that some unscrupulous persons have been sending Indian … unscrupulous persons have been sending Indian citizens to Middle East countries on the basis of forged Protector of Emigrants clearing stamps besides forged signatures of Protector of Emigrants, New Delhi. The passports of the respondents who in … and thereforee no further revision can lie before the High Court. Section 397(3) Criminal Procedure Code . is quite explicit in this regard, and is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ajaib Singh Lehna Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Jun-10-1952
CriminalConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15, 19, 19(1), 19(5), 19(6), 21, 22, 51, 227, 245 and 253; Abducted Persons (Recovery and Restoration) Act, 1949 - Sections 4, 6, 6(1) and 7
AIR1952P& H309
with regard to the detention in refugee camps of persons living in India violate the rights conferred upon Indian citizens under Article 19 of the Constitution?2. Js this Act 'ultra vires' the Constitution because in terms it … India as the Constitution has empowered Parliamept to make laws in regard to 'extradition' and 'admission into, and emigration and expulsion from, India'; and, lastly, that the Act of 1949 has been enacted in pursuance of an … house of Ajaib Singh petitioner, arrested Mst. Mukhtiar Kaur 'alias' Sardaran under Section 4 of the impugned Act and took her to the Muslim Girls … restoration of abducted persons. It is to remain in force till the 31st October, 1952. According to section 2 an 'abducted person' means a male
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChoctaw Nation Vs. Oklahoma
US Supreme Court
Apr-27-1970
Land Acquisition
Treaty of New Echota in 1835 between the United States and the Cherokees) and patents issued thereunder, petitioner Indian Nations are held, contrary to the claims of the State of Oklahoma and other respondents, to have received … and driven them out of their valleys and were now bringing them to the terms of an enforced emigration." Id. at 20. They were finally forcibly removed by the U.S. Army under General Scott: "He moved quickly … of Holston, July 2, 1791, 7 Stat. 39, 40; see Indian Intercourse Act of 1802, 2 Stat. 139. Even while it was making this solemn … the tail that went with the hide. As respects the Choctaws, another section of the Arkansas River was the boundary between the Choctaw and the … Choctaw Nation v. Oklahoma - 397 U.S. 620 (1970) U.S. Supreme Court Choctaw Nation
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHynes Vs. Grimes Packing Co.
US Supreme Court
May-31-1949
Land Acquisition
of May 1, 1936, the Secretary of the Interior issued Public Land Order No. 128, designating as an Indian reservation, for the use and benefit of the native inhabitants of Karluk, Alaska, certain described lands and the … Fed.Reg. 3105, 9528. [ Footnote 47 ] Executive Order of Feb. 17, 1922, creating the Alaska Peninsula Fisheries Reservation; Executive Order No. 3752 of Nov. … in the county jail, or by both such fine and imprisonment, and in case of the violation of section 3 of said Act approved June 26, 1906, as amended, there may be imposed a further fine not exceeding … the Metlakahtla Indians, and those people known as Metlakahtlans who have recently emigrated from British Columbia to Alaska, and such other Alaskan natives an may
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited States Vs. John
US Supreme Court
Jun-23-1978
Land Acquisition
Ruffleshirts, and Rednecks: Indian Allotments in Alabama and Mississippi, 1830-1860, pp. 121 (1961); G. Foreman, Indian Removal: The Emigration of the Five Civilized Tribes of Indians 21 (1953 ed.); F. Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law 56-59 … of the United States Government," and as used in the Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1153, which makes any Indian who commits certain specified … THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Lands designated as a reservation for Choctaw Indians residing in central Mississippi. held, on the basis of the history of the relations between the Mississippi Choctaws … within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States." "As used in this section, the offenses of rape and assault with intent to commit rape shall … 560 F.2d 1202, reversed and remanded; No. 77-575, 347 So.2d 959, reversed. BLACKMUN, J., delivered the opinion
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMontana Vs. United States
US Supreme Court
Mar-24-1981
Land Acquisition
450 U.S. 544 (1981) Montana v. United States No. 79-1128 Argued December 3, 1980 Decided March 24, 1981 450 U.S. 544 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED … failed to overcome t.his presumption, since it did not, by its terms, formally convey any land to the Indians at all. And whatever property rights the 1868 treaty created, its language is not strong enough to overcome … are driven off and your grass and timber consumed by the opening of roads and the passing of emigrants through your countries. For these losses he desires to compensate you." Quoted in Crow Tribe of Indians v. … its own right and as fiduciary for the Tribe, filed the present action, seeking a declaratory judgment quieting title to the riverbed in the United
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›