Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian contract act 1872 section 73 · Page 1 of about 1,177 results (0.065 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 21 1990

Gulbanu Razack Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (investigation ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-21-1990

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80C, 80L, 132, 132(1), 132(4), 132(4A), 132(5), 132(7), 132(11), 132(12), 132B, 132B(3), 132B(4), 244A, 297 and 297(2); Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 4; ;Indian Contract Act, 1872- Sections 73

Reported in : [1990]186ITR226(AP)

297 and 297 (2) of Income-tax Act, 1961, Section 4 of Interest Act, 1978 and Section 73 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 - writ petition filed for direction to pay compensatory interest on the amount seized and refunded subsequently -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2002

Thyssen Stahlunion Gmbh Vs. the Steel Authority of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-10-2002

Subject : Contract

Acts : Arbitration Act - Sections 30; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73

Reported in : 2002IIAD(Delhi)149; AIR2002Delhi255; 2002(1)ARBLR610(Delhi); 96(2002)DLT515

comes the issue of damages. The Arbitrator has adopted the principle by referring to Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which is as follows:- '73. When a contract has been broken, the party who suffers by such breach

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2003

Smt. Khamarunnisa Vs. Mudalappa

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-04-2003

Subject : CivilContract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Prevention of Fragmentation of Consolidation of Holding Act; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 21; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73; Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 - Sections 33 and 35; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 113

Reported in : ILR2003KAR4535

awarded under this section, the Court shall be guided by the principles specified in Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872).(5) No compensation shall be awarded under this Section unless the plaintiff has claimed any such

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 18 2000

Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Director Vs. Compa ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-18-2000

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73; Arbitration Act, 1949 - Sections 30 and 33

Reported in : ILR2004KAR4268

the award as claim No. 11 is based on irrational and arbitrary findings, it calls for interference. ;(B) INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 - SECTION 73 - ARBITRATION ACT, 1940 - SECTIONS 30, 33 - Bars damages for remote or indirect

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 1973

K.R. Rajamanickam Chettiar and ors. Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-12-1973

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73, 151, 152 and 161; Indian Railways Act, 1961 - Sections 73 and 74

Reported in : AIR1974Mad375

of a bailee and in this context alone had referred to Ss. 151, 152 and 161 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and the decisions of courts with reference there to Unfortunately, the learned Judge completely failed to take note … been completely changed by virtue of the amendment to the relevant sections of the Act made in 1961. Section 73 of the Act so amended is as follows:'73. Save as otherwise provided in this Act, a railway administration

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 10 1967

P.S.N.S. Ambalavana Chettiar and Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Express Newspap ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-10-1967

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 18 and 54(2); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73 and 176

Reported in : AIR1968SC741; [1968]2SCR293

of the newsprint in sheets and had no right to sell the goods under s. 176 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The real question is whether the respondent had the right to resell the goods under s. 54(2) of … by the buyer to accept the goods, see Illustration (c) to s. 73 of the Indian Contract Act. In the present case, no time was … property in any individual portion of the stock of 415 tons would remain vested in the appellants. 12. Section 18 of the Sale of Goods Act provides that where there is a contract for the sale of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2008

Shri Prabhubhai Jadhavji Rathod Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through Its A ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-28-2008

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34 and 37; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 55, 56 and 73; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 96; Maharashtra Contract Labours (Regulation and Abolition) Rules, 1971 - Rule 21

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR35; 2008(3)ARBLR204(Bom); 2008(4)BomCR594; (2008)110BOMLR852; 2008(4)MhLj238

our country question of delay in performance of contract is governed by Sections 55 and 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. If there is an abnormal rise in prices of material and labour, it may frustrate the contract and … and onwards, the learned Judge has proceeded to consider the entitlement for damages flowing from Section 55 and Section 73 of Contract Act in the light of various clauses embedded in GCC also Clause 26A of tender documents.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 1942

Ramchandra Lalbhai Vs. Chinubhai Lalbhai

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-17-1942

Subject : PropertyFamily

Reported in : (1943)45BOMLR1075

plaintiff No. 1 by defendant is revocable as it is not coupled with interest; Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.13. V.F. Taraporevala. Chinubhai Lalbhai & Bros., Ltd., was formed as a device to get capital and deposits for … loss of profits, loss of deposits, etc. Such damage may be due to bad management of the defendant. Section 73 of the Contract Act applies only when damages are assessable. Here, it does not apply, I say that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 1959

Shiva Jute Baling Limited Vs. Hindley and Company Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-1959

Subject : ContractArbitration

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73 and 74; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 33 and 35; Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1959SC1357; [1960]1SCR569

the arbitrators had purported to award such damages as could not be done under the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Both these contentions were negatived by the learned Single Judge and he ordered the award to be filed … the law of India is bad on the face of it and should not be enforced in India. Section 73 provides for compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract. It lays down that when a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 1971

Union of India, Owning Eastern Railway by Its General Manager, Calcutt ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-21-1971

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Railways Act - Sections 13, 72, 72-A, 73, 74, 74-A, 74-B, 74-C 74-D, 74-E, 75, 76, 77, 77-B, 78 and 78B; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 151, 152 and 161

Reported in : AIR1972Mad134; (1971)2MLJ257

of the railway administration shall be that of a bailee under Sections 151, 152 and 161 of the Indian Contract Act. 1872, for the loss, destruction, damage, deterioration or non-delivery of goods carried by railway within a period of 30 … Section 72 provided for execution of forwarding notes in respect of animals or goods carried on a railway. Section 73 defines the general responsibility of a railway administration as a carrier of animals and goods. While dealing with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial