Advanced Search Results

The Secretary of State for India Vs. Bhaskar Krishnaji Samant

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1925Bom485; (1925)27BOMLR973

paid in case of a breach of the conditions thereof may, notwithstanding anything in Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, be recovered from him in case of such breach as if it were an arrear of land-revenue.16. It … the Divisional Forest Officer. He, however, directed inquiry on the point arising on the plaintiff's application. On September 3, 1920, the plaintiff was informed that his tender was accepted and he was called by a notice of

Gulbanu Razack Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (investigation ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80C, 80L, 132, 132(1), 132(4), 132(4A), 132(5), 132(7), 132(11), 132(12), 132B, 132B(3), 132B(4), 244A, 297 and 297(2); Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 4; ;Indian Contract Act, 1872- Sections 73

Reported in : [1990]186ITR226(AP)

297 and 297 (2) of Income-tax Act, 1961, Section 4 of Interest Act, 1978 and Section 73 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 - writ petition filed for direction to pay compensatory interest on the amount seized and refunded subsequently - … by way of damages for wrongful detention of debt.... The law has, however, been amended in England by section 3, Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1934, empowering a Court of Record to award interest on the whole or

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. and an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72, 72(3), 73, 77, 77C, 77C(4), 78 and 78B; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 200; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 78B and 80; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 200; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 151, 152 and 161; Carriers Act, 1865; Explosive Rules; Tariff Rules

Reported in : 2005(5)ALD85

other provisions of this Act, be that of a bailee under Sections 151, 152 and 161 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (IX of 1872).(2) Omitted(3) Nothing in the common law of England or in the Carriers Act, 1865, regarding … file this suit. The cause of action alleged is not true and tenable. The service of notice under Sections 78-B and 80 C.P.C., are admitted, but the contents are denied. They denied that the value of the

The Official Assignee of Madras Vs. the Mercantile Bank of India Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1935)37BOMLR130

of the documents. The solution of the question depends on the true effect of Section 178 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, as then in force; that section which has since been repealed by the Indian Contract (Amendment) Act, 1930, … entitled to a good pledge, even though such mercantile agents were acting in fraud of the true owner. Section 3 of the Factors Act, 1889, provides that 'a pledge of document of title to goods shall be deemed

HDFC Bank Ltd. Vs. Rohan Dyes and Intermediates Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

if any, shall be refunded to the Petitioner. Companies Act, 1956, Sections 434(1)(a), 439;Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section138; Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 30; Gaming Act, 1845 (U.K), Section 18- Company Petition- Leave for Winding up- Petitioner Bank, an authorised dealer … is in these circumstances that the present Company Petition has come up for admission before me once again. 3. The brief facts giving rise to the controversy in the present Petition are as follows:- (a) It is

Sabava Yellappa Vs. Yamanappa Sabu

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1933Bom209; (1933)35BOMLR345

Transfer of Property Act, for an unlawful object or consideration within the meaning of Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act lays down that the consideration or object of an agreement is lawful … Mukhtyar, in 1918, who in his turn sold it to defendant No. 2 in May 1921. Survey No. 336, one of the lands given in gift, was sold by defendant No. 1 to defendants Nos. 3 and

Bharat Sarvodaya Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Mohatta Brothers Overruled

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 4, 30, 31(1), 31(2), 32, 32(3), 34, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 63(1), 69(2) and 69(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 86 and 87B - Order 30, Rules 1, 1(1), 1(2), 2, 2(1), 2(2), 2(3) and 4; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 45 and 70; Constitution of India - Article 133(1)

Reported in : AIR1969Guj178; (1969)GLR457

equally by all the partners who are compromises and all of whom are under Section 45 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, joined together in enforcing the promise against a third party promisor. The suit by a firm as we … on behalf of Messrs. Chaturbhujdas Kharawala Mohatta and Company hereinafter referred to as 'the new managing agents', on 31st July 1950. On 1st August 1950 a notice was issued by the secretary for sanctioning the said scheme

Sunderlal Saraf and ors. Vs. Subhas Chand JaIn and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 176; ;Madhya Pradesh Money Lenders Act, 1934 - Sections 3, 3(1), 6 and 7; Money Lenders Accounts Rules - Rules 6 and 13; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406

Reported in : AIR2006MP35; 2005(3)MPLJ73

pledged. According to plaintiffs by selling the pledged silver without notice as required by Section 176 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and in contravention of the specific directions of the plaintiffs conveyed to … money lender. Since the defendant is a money lender, he was required to comply with the provisions of Section 3 of the Act of 1934 which he never did. He did not maintained accounts for each debtors, as

Ministry of Defence, Government of India Vs. Cenrex Sp. Z.O.O and Othe ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

is also, at this stage, necessary to refer to and reproduce Sections 51, 52 and 54 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 inasmuch as these provisions will be relevant to determine the issue as to whether or not it was … Oral: 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act') is filed by the … Oral: 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the

Alphonse Vs. S. Dharmaraj

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 8, 16 and 16(3); Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 4; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 52; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 4; Christian Law

Reported in : (2002)2MLJ185

Family - judicial separation - Sections 3, 4 (1), 4 (2), 5, 8, 16 and 16 (3) of Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 4 of Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Order 6 Rule