Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian contract act 1872 section 24 · Page 1 of about 2,809 results (0.122 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 30 1983

Mahendrakumar Chandulal Vs. Central Bank of India

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-30-1983

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1984)1GLR237

in the bill of lading from liability for the negligence of its servants notwithstanding Section 151 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. This is also a Division Bench judgment wherein on the point under consideration, it has been observed as … Co. Ltd. (1909) ILR 32 Madras 95 In this case, the plaintiffs claimed damages for the loss of 246 bags of rice out of a consignment of 4,000 bags carried by the defendants under a bill of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 2001

Vasantha Viswanthan and ors. Vs. V.K. Elayalwar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-24-2001

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 31; Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1971 - Sections 48A; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23 and 24; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 52; Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 199; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 19 and 58; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 19; Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 91

Reported in : AIR2001SC3367; 2001(3)ARBLR110(SC); 2001(49)BLJR2289; JT2001(6)SC622; 2001(5)SCALE483; (2001)8SCC133

5 permits at a price to be ascertained was unlawful within the meaning of Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and accordingly it would be void in view of the provisions of Section 24 of the Indian Contract

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2008

Union of India (Uoi) Through Textile Commissioner Vs. Bhagwati Cottons ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-22-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28, 128, 129, 130 and 133 to 139; Limitation Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1907 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 37

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR63; IV(2008)BC73; 2008(5)BomCR909; 2008(2)CTLJ180(Bom)

Plaintiffs informed the Defendant No. 2 that in the light of the amendment to Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which came into force with effect from 8th January 1997, the Bank was not absolved of its obligation … principal sum of Rs. 2,10,25,350/-(Rupees Two Crores Ten Lakhs Twenty-five Thousand Three Hundred Fifty) at the rate of 24% per annum from the date of filing of the Suit until payment/realisation thereof. The Suit is already decreed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 11 1997

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Grand Enterprises

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-11-1997

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Abkari Act; Abkari Rules; Kerala Abkari Act - Sections 24 and 56; Foreign Liquor Rules - Rule 19; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 22 and 28; Income Tax Act

Reported in : [1999]235ITR594(Ker)

is no legal bar under Section 23 of the Contract Act, cannot be sustained. Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, states that the consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless it is forbidden by law ; … the partners of the firm. This licence was being utilised by the firm for running the said bar. Section 24 of the Kerala Abkari Act provides for granting of licence subject to such restrictions and on such conditions.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 1925

The Secretary of State for India Vs. Bhaskar Krishnaji Samant

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-07-1925

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1925Bom485; (1925)27BOMLR973

paid in case of a breach of the conditions thereof may, notwithstanding anything in Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, be recovered from him in case of such breach as if it were an arrear of land-revenue.16. It … proved. Accordingly the trial Court pasted a decree in favour of the plaintiff declaring that the tender, Exhibit 24, did not amount to a contract enforceable by law, and granted an injunction perpetually enjoining the defendant from

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 1946

The Official Assignee Vs. Madholal Sindhu

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-21-1946

Subject : Company

Reported in : AIR1947Bom217; (1946)48BOMLR828

as res judicata against the plaintiff, and that no notice having been given under Section 176 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, by defendant No. 2 to defendant No. 4 the sale by defendant No. 2 to defendant No. 3 … at an overdraft of Rs. 16,771-9-3 and of Raghavji which was overdrawn to the extent of about Rs. 24000, making his total 'liabilities to the bank upwards of Rs. 2,00,000. The bank held as security not only

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2006

Bhagwati Enterprises Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation an ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-22-2006

Subject : ContractArbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 24(1) and 33(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2, 10 and 32

Reported in : AIR2006Raj233

conditions of the tender submitted to the RSRTC and for further performance?11. As per Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (for short 'the Act') an agreement which is enforceable by law is a contract. In order to be … the applicant had suggested names for appointment of the sole arbitrator. The RSRTC, however, vide letter dated May 24, 2005 informed the applicant that as per Cl. 29 of the tender document only the Chairman of RSRTC

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 1943

State of Gondal Vs. Govindram Seksaria

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-08-1943

Subject : PropertyContract

Reported in : (1944)46BOMLR822

and having regard to Section 55 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and Section 69 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, to which I will presently refer.12. The whole of the purchase price being paid, plaintiff No. 1 was … such majority being in fact the Maharaja. This clause is important in view of what happened.5. On July 24, 1937, the trustees being still in possession, the solicitors to plaintiff No. 1 wrote to the Maharaja a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2021

M/s N.n. Global Mercantile Private Limited Vs. M/s Indo Unique Flame L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-11-2021

Subject : Arbitration

which is voidable at the option of a party (as by way of illustration u/S. 19 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872) in paragraph 15 of the judgment, it was held that the invalidity which attaches itself to the main … amount above rupees ten lakh subject to maximum of rupees twenty-five lakhs 24 5.4 The Stamp Act is a fiscal measure enacted to secure the … be maintained with respect to the enforcement of the Bank Guarantee. 1.7 Indo Unique filed an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”) in Civil (Commercial) Suit No.62 of 2017, seeking

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2000

Bank of India Vs. V. Swaroop Reddy

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-23-2000

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 116; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70

Reported in : AIR2001AP260; 2001(2)ALT388

extracted above with reference to the statutory provisions incorporated in the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 as also Indian Contract Act, 1872. Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 reads: '106. Duration of certain leases in absence of written … below by which the suit of the plaintiff was decreed in a sum of Rs. 39,461.10 paise with 24% interest per annum on Rs. 22,942.50 paise from the date of institution of the suit till realisation with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial