Advanced Search Results
United India Insurance Co., Ltd., Rep. by its Chairman, Chennai and Ot ...
Chennai
Aug-11-2016
Land Acquisition
the acts of the agent, when the agent exceeds his authority. 21. Section 227 and 228 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 reads as follows : "227. Principal how far bound, when agent exceeds authority - When an agent does
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGulam HussaIn Ahmedali and Co. Vs. Trustees of the Port of Trust, Bomb ...
Mumbai
Mar-20-1962
Commercial
Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19(1) and 228; Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 4, 61A(1), 61A(2), 61B, 73 and 87; Indian Ports Act, 1875; Port Trusts and Port (Amendment) Act, 1951; Indian Railways Act, 1890; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 151, 152 and 161; Calcutta Port Act, 1890 - Sections 112 and 135; Madras-Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 40 and 111; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 36
AIR1963Bom45; (1962)64BOMLR670; ILR1963Bom35
Act, 1890 (9 of 1890) be that of a bailee under Sections 151, 152 and 161 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872), omitting the words 'in the absence of any special contract' in section 152 of the … view of this defence, the plaintiffs applied to this Court for a transfer of the suit under Article 228 of the Constitution on the ground that, in the plaintiffs' submission, Section 87 of the Bombay Port Trust
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLahari Recording Company Private Limited, Bangalore Vs. Sourabh Market ...
Karnataka
Feb-08-2000
CommercialIntellectual Property Rights
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 and 151 - Order 7, Rule 11; Copy Right Act, 1957 - Sections 1 to 6, 9 to 12, 13 to 21, 13(1 and 7), 19-A, 19-A(2), 22 to 29, 30 to 32-B, 33 to 36-A, 37 to 39-A, 44 to 50-A, 51 to 53-A, 53-A(3), 54 to 62, 71 to 73, 72(2) and 74 to 79; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 10, 14 to 16 and 30; Indian Copyright Act, 1914; Copyright Act, 1911; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 345 and 346; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Indian Contract Act, 1872
ILR2000KAR5057; 2001(4)KarLJ78
other words, these agreements are nothing but the lawful contracts within the meaning of Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and, therefore, in essence, the plaintiffs suit against defendant is instituted for enforcement of the contractual rights and … all proceedings before it shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code. Since the Board is declared to be a Civil Court for this limited
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Prudential Capital Markets Ltd., Calcutta Vs. State of A.P. and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-02-2000
ConsumerConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1), 3, 12 and 27(1); Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10-E and 58-A; Reserve Bank of India Act - Sections 45-Q and 45-QA; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; CLB Regulations, 1991 - Regulation 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections - 9; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections - 193, 195, 196 and 228; Banking Laws (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1963; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections - 34; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections - 9;
2000(5)ALD418; 2000(5)ALT468; [2002]108CompCas441(AP)
the Forum shall be deemed to be judicial proceeding within the meaning of Sections 193 and 228 of Indian Penal Code. Apart from this, the Act in Section 27 lays down the procedure for Inking penal action … the contention is not well founded. Parliament is aware of the provisions of the Arbitration Act and the Contract Act, 1872 and the consequential remedy available under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure i.e., to avail of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNutan Kumar and Others Vs. Iind Additional District Judge, Banda and O ...
Allahabad
May-20-1993
TenancyContract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2, 3, 10, 12 and 23 to 30; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 6, 105 and 108; Constitution of India - Article 13, 13(3) and 141; Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 7(2); Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 11, 12, 13, 15, 15(1), 16, 16(1), 17, 17(1) and 31; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 15; Central Provinces and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949; Specific Relief Act; Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929; Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1969 - Sections 5(8); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 166; Uttar P
AIR1994All298
matter relating to all agreements constituting subsratum Of a valid contract are subject to and governting by the Indian Contract Act, 1872, hereinafter called the Contract Act.3. Clauses (h) and (g) of Section 2 of the Contract Act declare that … of an 'agreement' - (See Pollack and Mulla on 'Indian Contract and Specific Relief Acts', 10th Edition, page 228).59. A 'lease' of a building involves two promises: (1) by the lessor to transfer his rightto enjoy his
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajender Kumar vs.rama Bala Gupta
Delhi
Jan-14-2019
Land Acquisition
ordinarily a breach of contract gives right to remedy and relief of damages under Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Specific performance is the alternative to the relief of damages and Courts have in view of Section 20 … also refer to the judgment titled as “Shree Aadhiya Build Well Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kartar Singh & Ors, 228 (2016) Delhi Law Times 10, wherein the Hon'ble Court has observed as under:(cid:173) “9. Onus of this issue
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPresent:- Mr. Mrigank Sharma Advocate Vs. National Insurance Company L ...
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-31-2014
Land Acquisition
finding regarding principal's right to revoke the agreement in case of excess of agent's authority in terms of Section 228 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, even though no pleadings to this effect was raised without framing any … its agent and authorized representatives who had issued the cover note in terms of Section 226 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872?.d.Whether the learned lower Appellate Court could have returned a finding regarding principal's right to revoke the agreement in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamchandra Lalbhai Vs. Chinubhai Lalbhai
Mumbai
Jul-17-1942
PropertyFamily
(1943)45BOMLR1075
plaintiff No. 1 by defendant is revocable as it is not coupled with interest; Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.13. V.F. Taraporevala. Chinubhai Lalbhai & Bros., Ltd., was formed as a device to get capital and deposits for … business in which joint family funds have been used.;Annamalai Chetty v. Murugasa Chetty (1903) L.R. 30 I.A. 220, 228 : s.c. 5 Bom. L.R. 494, referred to.;An agreement whereby the managing agent of a textile mill agrees
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S National Highways Authority of India vs.m/s Itd-Sdb(jv)
Delhi
Oct-31-2018
Land Acquisition
must also advert to a contention advanced, based on the provisions of Section 2278 and 2289 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (in short „Contract Act‟). Based on the said provisions, it is argued that NHAI cannot be called upon … the principal is not bound by the acts done by an agent beyond the authority conferred on him. Section 228 adverts to a situation that where an agent acts outside the scope of his authority and the unauthorized
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe General Manager, Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Banga ...
Karnataka
Nov-23-1999
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(35), 149(2) and 157; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10
2001ACJ1480; ILR2000KAR718; 2000(3)KarLJ344
Acts/Rules/Orders:Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(35), 149(2) and 157;Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Section 10Case Referred:New India Assurance Company Limited v. H. Siddalinga Naika and Others, AIR 1984 Kant. … 1872 - Section 10Case Referred:New India Assurance Company Limited v. H. Siddalinga Naika and Others, AIR 1984 Kant. 228JUDGEMENTMohamed Anwar, J.1. This appeal is filed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Bangalore ('the K.S.R.T.C.' in short)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »