Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian contract act 1872 section 210 · Page 1 of about 115 results (0.066 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 16 1907

Poma Dongra Vs. William Gillespie

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-16-1907

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1907)9BOMLR143

the plaintiffs were in a position to dominate his will.;(1) That reading Sub-section 16 and 19A of the Indian Contract Act 1872 together the Court had the power to interfere and relieve a defendant against what might appear to the … of the plaintiffs by instalment and applied to pay by instalments I would have considered the application. Under Section 210 of the Civil Procedure Code this Court has the power to make its money decrees payable by instalment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2007

K.R. Steelunion Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Ac ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-05-2007

Subject : CompanyTenancy

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446; Presidency Small Causes Court Act, 1882 - Sections 41; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3(1), 13(1), 13(2) and 28; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1) and 33; Indian Contract Act, 1872; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106; Companies Act - Sections 210, 211, 446, 455 and 458; Super Profits Tax Act, 1963; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 117, 298 and 299

Reported in : 2007(3)BomCR821; 2007(4)MhLj280; [2007]76SCL108(Bom)

such licensees or tenants are not governed by Rent Act but they are subjected to the provisions of Indian Contract Act, 1872 and/or the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 or by other Laws other than Rent Law. 17. Learned Counsel … post facto leave can be granted. 25. Mr. Thakkar further submits that in view of the provisions of Section 210 and 211 of the Companies Act read with Rule 298 and 299 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2015

The Inspector General of Registration, Pattinapakkam, Chennai and Anot ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Nov-30-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

69(1), section 35(1)(c), section 35(3)(c), Section 69(2), Section 68(2) €“ General Clauses Act, 1894 - Section 23 - Indian Contract Act, 1872 -Section 201, Section 202, Section 209, Section 203 to Section 210, Section 203, Section 204, Section 205, Section 206

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 10 1970

R.R.N. Ramalinga Nadar Vs. V. Narayana Reddiar

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-10-1970

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 1 and 2; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 2(23)

Reported in : AIR1971Ker197

many States in the continent.The extent of liability of a bailee under Sections 151 and 152 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, is different from the extent of liability of a common carrier. A bailee is only bound to take … reward for so doing.'In Belfast Rope work Co. v. Bushell. 1918-1 KB 210, Bailhache J. said:'...to make a man a common carrier he must carry … necessary for the purposes of his business, not being a business of Providing transport, is a private carrier. Section 2(23) defines a 'public carrier as under:'2 (23) 'Public carrier, means an owner of a transport vehicle who

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2009

Md. Ibrahim and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-04-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 24, 25, 206, 207, 208, 210, 239, 240, 242, 243, 246 to 253, 261, 264 to 266, 323, 341, 415 to 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 463 to 471, 496 and 504; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3) and 482

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR3087; JT2009(11)SC533; 2009(12)SCALE250; (2009)8SCC751; 2009(9)LC4349(SC); [2009] 13 SCR 1254

dictionary definition of `fraud' is 'deliberate deception, treachery or cheating intended to gain advantage'. Section 17 of the Contract Act, 1872 defines `fraud' with reference to a party to a contract. In Dr. Vimla v. Delhi Administration : AIR … order dated 19.7.2003 took cognizance of the offences under Sections 323, 341, 420, 467, 471 and 504 of Indian Penal Code (for short, `the Code') and referred the complaint for investigation under Section 156(3) of the Code … seizure (Section 207).(iii) Fraudulent suffering or obtaining a decree (Section 208 and 210)(iv) Fraudulent possession/delivery of counterfeit coin (Section 239, 240, 242 and 243).(v) Fraudulent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 1959

Pamulapati Bhushayya Vs. Kommareddy Chinnapareddi and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-13-1959

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 6; Central Excies Rules, 1944 - Rules 175(2), 178(4) and 210

Reported in : AIR1960AP39

view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Civil - illegal partnership - Section 23 of Contract Act, 1872, Section 6 of Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and Rules 175 (2), 178 (4) and 210 of Central … note executed in settlement of account of an illegal partnership void and unenforceable under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act. It may be stated that the first respondent had a licence to carry on tobacco trade for Phirangipuram

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1924

Rose Fernandez Vs. Joseph Gonsalves

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-14-1924

Subject : Contract

Reported in : AIR1925Bom97; (1924)26BOMLR1035; 85Ind.Cas.587

of law, there would have been no difficulty whatsoever in this case but, on the wording of the Indian Contract Act, their Lordships of the Privy Council held that all contracts of minors were void and not merely voidable. … contract entered into by minor's parent--Breach of promise of marriage--Minor can sue for damages--Indian Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 11.;A minor can sue to recover damages for breach of contract of marriage entered into on his or … to follow an older judgment in Dutton v. Poole (1688) 2 Lev. 210. But the later decisions clearly show that that attempt had not had

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2006

Mr. Diljeet Titus, Advocate Vs. Mr. Alfred A. Adebare and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-08-2006

Subject : CivilIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Order 7, Rule 14 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 17, 47 and 49; Labour Law; Copyright Act - Sections 2, 14, 16 and 17; Income Tax Rules ; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 49(1); Evidence Act - Sections 115 and 126; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 381, 385 and 386; Income Tax Act - Sections 66; Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 6; Social Security Act, 1935; Consumer Protection Act 1986 - Sections 210

Reported in : 130(2006)DLT330; 2006(32)PTC609(Del)

would not apply in the present case. It was observed in para 25 as under: 25. While the Contract Act, 1872, does not profess to be a complete code dealing with the law relating to contracts, we emphasize that … defendants. In this behalf learned Counsel referred to Section 6 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 which provides for a mode of determining existence of … profession and an occupation in the context that a person engaged in occupation rendered services as envisaged under Section 210 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986. The service rendered by a person belonging to a profession does not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2004

Sughra Bee Vs. Kareez Fatima Qureshi

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-05-2004

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 29; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 15

Reported in : 2004(3)ALD821; 2004(3)ALT704

be sold and is not such a document hit by uncertainty as contemplated by Section 29 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 ?2. Whether Ex.A-1 is hit by Section 29 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 inasmuch as it does … only one item of property involved in O.S. No. 111 of 1972 and defendant has 171 out of 210 shares in that property and a preliminary decree has been passed for partition and allotment of 171 shares

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 2013

Amci Pty. Ltd. Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-01-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

119 of the award that SAIL had admittedly not claimed general damages contemplated by Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and the claim was for damages as per para 9 of the General Conditions of the Agreement i.e. … THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on : July 01, 2013 + FAO(OS) 210/2012 VALE AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD. Appellant Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Amit Sibal, Mr.Anirudh Das, Ms.Smarika Singh,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial