Advanced Search Results

The Inspector General of Registration, Pattinapakkam, Chennai and Anot ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

69(1), section 35(1)(c), section 35(3)(c), Section 69(2), Section 68(2) €“ General Clauses Act, 1894 - Section 23 - Indian Contract Act, 1872 -Section 201, Section 202, Section 209, Section 203 to Section 210, Section 203, Section 204, Section 205, Section 206

Md. Ibrahim and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 24, 25, 206, 207, 208, 210, 239, 240, 242, 243, 246 to 253, 261, 264 to 266, 323, 341, 415 to 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 463 to 471, 496 and 504; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3) and 482

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR3087; JT2009(11)SC533; 2009(12)SCALE250; (2009)8SCC751; 2009(9)LC4349(SC); [2009] 13 SCR 1254

dictionary definition of `fraud' is 'deliberate deception, treachery or cheating intended to gain advantage'. Section 17 of the Contract Act, 1872 defines `fraud' with reference to a party to a contract. In Dr. Vimla v. Delhi Administration : AIR … the offences under Sections 323, 341, 420, 467, 471 and 504 of Indian Penal Code (for short, `the Code') and referred the complaint for investigation … when done fraudulently (or fraudulently and dishonestly) are made offences. These include:(i) Fraudulent removal or concealment of property (Section 206, 421, 424)(ii) Fraudulent claim to property to prevent seizure (Section 207).(iii) Fraudulent suffering or obtaining a decree (Section

City Municipal Council Vs. C. Ramu

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 40; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28; Karnataka Civil Court Act, 1964

Reported in : ILR1989KAR2138

to operate against the defendant. As such the defendant cannot also be estopped from contending to the contra.;(C) CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (Central Act No. 9 of 1872) - Section 28 - Clause absolving contracting party from liability of any … 31-1-1975. Such a privilege squarely fell within the definition of 'license' as defined in Section 52 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882 which is as follows:'Where one person grants to another, or to a definite number of … it is not possible to hold that the decree passed in O. 206). The alleged title of Basavanagouda to the suit lands was not necessarily

Bright Brothers (Private) Limited Vs. J.K. Sayani

Court : Chennai

Subject : Contract

Reported in : AIR1976Mad55; (1975)2MLJ257

as pleaded by the appellants herein. Finally he came to the conclusion that under Section 206 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the respondent was entitled to a reasonable notice, that that reasonable notice, having regard to the circumstances of

Sohrabji Dhunjibhoy Medora Vs. the Oriental Government Security Life A ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : InsuranceCivil

Reported in : AIR1944Bom166; (1944)46BOMLR279

as defined toy Section 2(10) of the Act;;(4) That the plaintiffs were entitled, under Section 206 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, to a reasonable notice of the revocation of their agency, which in this case was a period of

Smt.S.Savithramma vs Smt.S.Padmavathamma

Court : Karnataka

General Powerof Attorney (GPA) by the Appellant (Plaintiff) was valid and legally effective under Section 208 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and whether proper notice of termination was given to the concerned parties, thereby affecting the validity of subsequent … of defendant No.5 (Nagarathnamma), the respondents assert that the appellant did not comply with the legal requirements under Section 206 of the Indian Contract Act. The appellant issued a notice of cancellation on October 11, 2002, but failed

GOPAMMA Vs Murugesan

Court : Chennai

power of attorney dated 21.02.2008 is fatal under Section 206 of Indian Contract Act. Section 206 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, requires that reasonable notice must be given when an agency is revoked or renounced. If this notice is

Viacom 18 Media Private Ltd., Mumbai Vs. Msm Discovery Pvt. Ltd., Mumb ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : MRTP

on the petitioner. (j) Having regard to the provisions contained in Section 201, 205 and 206 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the respondent being only entitled to damages even if no notice of 90 days have been served on

S.Ravi vs S.Thiyagarajan@Icehouse Thiyagarajan

Court : Chennai

agreement was already executed before the cancellation. Agency will not terminate automatically as per Section 208 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Further, the sixth defendant is the mortgagee has already initiated SARFAESI proceedings. The first defendant has already issued … the cancellation of agency is concerned, there is aspecific legal requirement under substantive law namely Indian Contract Act. Section 206 of the Indian Contract Act reads as follows:- “206. Notice of revocation or renunciation.-Reasonable notice must be given

Tulsabai Nathudas and ors. Vs. Narayan Ajabrao Raut

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2 and 25(3); Central Provinces Debt Conciliation Act, 1933 - Sections 13(1), 13-C(1) and 13-C(4)

Reported in : AIR1974Bom72; 1974MhLJ28

follows :'As to cases occurring since the 1st of September, 1872, see the Indian Contract Act, IX if 1872, Section 25, Clause 2 and Clause 3, which seem to leave the law unaltered in such instances as the … Somalwar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, contends that the provisions of Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act which was invoked by the lower appellate court against the plaintiff had no application in the instant case … earlier decision in Tillakchand Hindumal v. Jitamal Sudaram (1873) 10 Bom HCR 206. That was a Division Bench decision in an appeal decided by Westropp,