Advanced Search Results

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hassan Chand and Sons

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 26A; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184, 184(4), 185, 185(5), 187 to 189, 246, 297 and 297(2); Income Tax (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 1962 - Schedule - Articles 2 and 3; Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 37

Reported in : [1997]224ITR244(Raj)

earlier there was no corresponding provision like Section 37 in the repealed Sections 239 to 266 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which were replaced by the present Indian Partnership Act, 1932. By giving a place to this section in … 146, 153 (except Sub-section (2) and Clause (iii) of Sub-section (3)), Sections 156 to 158, 185, 187 to 189, 282 to 284 and 288.21. It is thus quite evident that the matter of registration of a firm

Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. and India Steamship Co. Ltd. Vs. the Union o ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(4); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 186 to 189, 222, 223 and 230

Reported in : 2005(1)CTLJ420(Mad); (2004)4MLJ599

of the plaintiff.21. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants by taking us through Section 230 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 ( in short 'the Act') and various decisions would contend that in any event the first defendant, being … issued by the Madras Port Trust vide Exs.D.11 dated 30.03.1987 and P.4 dated 17.06.1987. Further, Sections 186 to 189 of the Act, make it clear about the agent's liability and in the light of the materials placed

C.V. George and ors. Vs. Income-tax Officer and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(7), 2(31) and 222(2)

Reported in : [1976]102ITR724(Ker)

in this Sub-rule shall be deemed to limit or otherwise affect the provisions of Section 247 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. (2) Where the decree-holder claims to be entitled to cause the decree to be executed against any person … dues of a firm available under the Partnership Act can be applied only in the case envisaged under Section 189 of the Act; (c) the proceedings arc hit by Articles 19(1)(f) and 265 of the Constitution ; and

M/s. Padia Timber Co. P. Ltd. Vs. The Board Of Trustees Of Visakhapatn ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

concluded contract between the Respondent-Port Trust and the Appellant, the Trial Court relied on Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which is set out hereinbelow for convenience: “4. Communication when complete.-The communication of a proposal is complete when … High Court in M/s Saraya Distillery, Sardarbaggar v. Union of India 1. AIR1998AP3812. AIR1963SC14053. AIR1998Karnataka 354 4. AIR1979Madras 189 5. AIR1915Privy Council 48 6. AIR1984Delhi 360 7. AIR1962SC366(V49 C57) 8. AIR1979SC133914 and Anr. (supra), the Trial Court

Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Hassan Chand and Sons.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1996)133CTR(Raj)284

earlier there was no corresponding provision like s. 37 in the repealed ss. 239 to 266 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which were replaced by the present Indian Partnership Act, 1932. By giving a place to this section in … 146, 153 [except sub-s. (2) and cl. (iii) of sub-s. (3)], ss. 156 to 158, 185, 187 to 189, 282 to 284 and 288.6. It is thus quite evident that the matter of registration of a firm

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Mahadeolal Prabhudayal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72(1), 72(2), 72(3) and 77; ;Indian contract Act, 1872 - Sections 152 and 161; Carriers Act, 1865; ;Evidence Act - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1965SC1755; 1966(0)BLJR91; [1965]3SCR145

by railway to be the same as that of a bailee under Sections 152 and 161 of the Indian contract Act, 1872, subject to other provisions of the Act. Sub-section (2) of s. 72 provides that an agreement purporting to … first contended that the suit was barred by s. 77 of the Indian Railways Act, No. IX of 1890, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), inasmuch as notice required therein was not given by the respondent. Secondly

Dhanbhagvati and anr. Vs. Mandsaur Electric Supply Co. Ltd., Mandsaur

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rules 1 and 9; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 185(1)

Reported in : AIR1981MP259

as between him and them, with them during their joint lives. This is what Section 45 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, inter alia provides. Accordingly, in absence of a contract expressing the contrary intention, the promise made by the … of the suit lands as sub-tenant on 2-10-1959; that in the absence of resumption of the land under Section 189 of the Code, the defendant became Bhumiswami for the suit lands and that the plaintiff had lost right

Kal Airways Private Limited Vs. Spicejet Limited and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of submissions of SEBI/BSE, issuance and allotment of warrants is impossible under law, therefore, Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 read with Clause 17.6 of the SPA is triggered and now it is to be decided at this … respondents does not dispute that in its meeting held on 21st August, 2014, proposed to issue and allot 189,091,378 warrants at an issue price of Rs.16.30 convertible into equivalent number of equity shares of the Respondent No.1

Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. Vs. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 3, 4, 10, 10(1), 10E, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 16, 32, 34, 36, 71, 88, 91B, 172(1), 173, 173(2), 176(3), 176(5), 189(2), 203, 204, 204(4), 205, 207, 208, 209(4), 277, 283(1), 294, 294(2), 294(2A), 294(5), 294A, 294A(1), 295(5), 299, 299(1), 299(4), 300, 300(1), 300(3), 300(4), 314, 314(1), 314(2), 314(3), 397 and 398; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1965

Reported in : [1971]41CompCas377(Bom); [1971]41ITR377(Bom)

is merely an agent of a shareholder to vote at a particular meeting. Under section 203 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, except where an agent has an interest in the subject-matter of the agency, the principal may revoke the … private company, section 314 applied to the appointment of the private company as sole selling agents under section 189(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, a resolution is a special resolution when, inter alia, the intention to propose

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Bihar Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1956 - Rule 4A; Restrictirve Trade Practice Act, 1956; Bombay Service Rules - Rule 15; West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporarty Provisions) Act, 1950 - Sections 18(1); Provident Fund Act, 1925 - Sections 143; General Insurance Provision (Nationalisation) Act, 1972; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 5(2); Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act, 1946; Union Territories Law Act, 1950; Prize Competition Act, 1955 - Sections 2; Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951; Corporation's Service, Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1979 - Rules 9, 36 and 37; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment ans Service) Regulations, 1952 - Regulation 9; Delhi Road Transport Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 18, 19, 45 and 53; Indian Contr

Reported in : AIR1991SC101; (1991)1CompLJ1(SC); JT1990(3)SC725; 1991LabIC91; (1991)ILLJ395SC; 1991Supp(1)SCC600; [1990]Supp1SCR142; 1991(1)SLJ56(SC); MANU/SC/0031/1991

of the principles of natural justice.37. Shri Ramamurthi reminded us that before India became independent in 1947, the Indian Contract Act 1872 was applicable only to British India on its own force. By Merged State Laws Act, 1949 it was … 2876 of 1986 first. The appellant herein-the Delhi Transport Corporation, is a statutory body formed and established Under Section 3 of the Delhi Road Transport Act, 1950 read with Delhi Road Transport (Amendment) Act, 1971 (hereinafter called … of Section 30, Sub-section (2) and Section 56 of the Prisons Act, 1894 was in question. Krishna Iyer, J, speaking for this Court at p.