Advanced Search Results

Vidya Prakash Sethi Vs. Punjab National Bank, New Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Administration of Evacuee Property Ordinance - Sections 6; Transfer of Evacuee Deposit Act, 1954; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 154

Reported in : ILR1976Delhi605

in the plaint.(27) The liability of the resplendent bank was the one fixed by section 154 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 which is :-- 'S. 154: If the bailee makes any use of the goods hailed which is not

State Bank of Patiala Vs. Northland Sugar Complex Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 529, 529A and 530; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 154; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 171; Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1985

Reported in : [2004]55SCL92(Punj& Har)

above, the applicant-Bank has relied upon the terms of the agreement as well as Section 171 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Section 171 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, is in two parts. The first part is in the absence … including the applicant-Bank will not carry any interest after winding up order is passed in terms of Rule 154 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959.13. I have considered the respective arguments raised by the learned counsel for

Videocon Appliances Ltd. Vs. Maker Chambers V Premises Co-op. Socy. Lt ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 11, 22, 22(2), 23, 23(1A), 23(2), 24 and 154; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UD(I); Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 - Sections 7; Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 - Sections 128; Indian Contract Act, 1872; Societies Registration Act, 1860

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR97; 2006(1)BomCR6; 2006(2)MhLj388

a society except the following, that is to say--(a) an individual, who is competent to contract under the Indian Contract Act, 1872;(b) a firm, company or any other body corporate constituted under any law for the time being in … S.U. Kamdar, J.1. The present petition raises an issue whether under the provisions of Section 154 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 a power can be exercised to entertain a second revision application.

Mahesh Chand Vs. Ajai Sood and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 15 and 115; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 154 and 336; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100; Indian Contract Act - Sections 23

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC355

merit and is hereby dismissed with costs. (i) Property - promissory estoppel - Section 115 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Sections 154 and 336 of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - second appeal filed … basis of public policy. The contract against the public policy cannot be enforced under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act. The Court cannot pass a decree to enforce a contract which is against the public policy. Therefore, irrespective

St. Anthony's Co-operative Society Limited Vs. the Secretary (Co-opera ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 2, 4, 9, 12, 14, 22, 23, 24 and 154, Rule 10; Indian Contract Act, 1872; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Constitution of India - Article 15(1), 19(1), 21, 25, 31-A; Hindi Sahitya Sammelan Act, 1962

Reported in : 2001(1)BomCR730

except the following, that is to say : (a) an individual, who is competent to contract under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. (b) a firm, Company or any other body corporate constituted under any law for the time being in … 3rd and 4th Respondents be admitted as members of the Society. The Society preferred a Revision Application under Section 154 of the Act before the Divisional Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies who, by an order dated 31st January,

Satyabrata Ghose Vs. Mugneeram Bangur and Co. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 56

Reported in : AIR1954SC44; (1954)IMLJ41(SC)

are concerned, they must look primarily to the law as embodied in sections 32 and 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.' 12. We hold, therefore, that the doctrine of frustration is really an aspect or part of the law … Joseph Constantine Steamship Line Limited v. Imperial Smelting Corporation Ltd. [1942] A.C. 154 at 168, Viscount Maugham observed that the ''doctrine of frustration is only … before this date, there was an order passed by the Collector, 24-Parganas, on 12th of November, 1941, under Section 79 of the Defence of India Rules, on the strength of which a portion of the land covered

The National Small Industries Corporation Ltd vs M/S Mysore Lamp Works ...

Court : Karnataka

bond.”12. In support of his contentions, he drew the attention of this Court to Section 140 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which reads as under: “140.Rights of surety on payment or performance.-Where a guaranteed debt has become due, or … wordedand defendants Nos. 2 and 3, as already pointed out, have given up their rights under sections 133, 154, 135, 139 and 141 of the Contract Act. But nevertheless, the proceeding being one, the court in the

Phoenix Mills Ltd. Vs. M.H. Dinshaw and Co.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Reported in : AIR1946Bom469; (1946)48BOMLR313

dispensed with the performance of those obligations on the part of the defendants under Section 63 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872; and finally they also base their defence on an estoppel operating against the plaintiffs.2. The incidents of a … and also their earlier decision reported in Chimna Mal-Ram Nath v. Mool Chand-Ram Bhagat (1928) L.R. 55 IndAp 154. The proposition that their Lordships were laying down was perfectly sound as far as the English law was

Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. V. Hotels Limited and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

being in default could not and did not arise. It is submitted that under Section 39 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, there must be not only categorical refusal to perform by the promisor of his promise in entering but … for which neither was responsible,." In Joseph Constantine Steamship Line Limited v. Imperial Smelting Corporation Ltd. [1942] A.C. 154 at 168), Viscount Maugham observed that the "doctrine of frustration is only a special case of the discharge

J. Thomas and Co. (Jute and Gunnies) Pvt. Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. th ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 30 and 33; ;Contract Act, 1972 - Section 230; ;Raw Jute (Central Jute Board and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1951 - Sections 5 and 6

Reported in : AIR1979Cal20,82CWN864

void and illegal. We have also to keep in view the relevant provisions of Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. These provisions are :--'23. The consideration or object of an agreement is lawful unless--it is of such a … disputes had arisen J. Thomas for the first time by its letter dated the 26th July, 1951 (page 154 of the Paper Book) disclosed the name of the principal. This act on the part of J. Thomas