Advanced Search Results

Dai-ichi Karkaria Private Ltd., Bombay Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Commiss ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CommercialCustoms

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 38; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 94 and 151 - Order 6, Rule 4 and Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 15 and 17; Companies Act, 1956; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR1992Bom309; 1991(4)BomCR631; (1991)93BOMLR183

not exhaustive. The, above-referred principles are also relevant for interpretation and elucidation of law of coercion contained in Section 15 of Indian Contract Act, 1872. These principles was broadly approved by our Supreme Court in a different context … the defendant No. I did not say a word. On this aspect, theExplanation to Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 is of considerable significance. The said Explanation reads as under:--'Explanation silence as to facts likely to affect the

Prasad Film Laboratories Vs. G.V. Films Limited, Represented by Its Di ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2005(2)CTC372

and 16 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. He further contended that as per Section 170 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the appellant herein is entitled to lien over others. According to him, the plaintiff is not entitled to … the suit. He further contended that the plaintiff has not performed his obligation and has not satisfied Sections 15 and 16 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. He further contended that as per Section 170 of the

Food Corporation of India Vs. Prem Chand Jain

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

at any time before its acceptance. For this conclusion, learned trial court relied on Section 5 of the Indian Contract Act 1872, which states as follows:5. Revocation of Proposals and acceptance A proposal may be revoked at any time before … 21.07.2000. That tender, inter alia, empowered the appellant to extend the period of acceptance for another period of 15 days. On 21.07.2000, the appellant exercised its right in terms of the said tender and extended the period

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Amar Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Limitation Act - Sections 19 - Schedule - Articles 30 and 31; Indian Railway Act, 1890 - Sections 77 and 80; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 148, 151, 152, 161 and 194

Reported in : AIR1960SC233; [1960]2SCR75

other provisions of the Act, be that of a bailee under s. 151, 152 and 161 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Section 148 of the Indian Contract Act defines 'bailment' thus : 'A 'bailment' is the delivery of goods by … non-delivery of goods entrusted by the former to the latter for transit to New Delhi. 2. On August 15, 1947, India was constituted into two Dominions, India and Pakistan; and soon thereafter civil disturbances broke out in

Sorabji Hormusha Joshi and Co. Vs. V.M. Ismail and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 13(1), 15, 16, 16(2), 41 and 471; English Sale of Goods Act, 1893; Uniform Sales Act; Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1953; Sale of Goods and Partnership Act, 1950; Sale of Goods Act (India and Pakistan), 1957;

Reported in : AIR1960Mad520

both these points is the same in England, U. S. A. and India.(7) Before the passing of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the rules of English law, including those in the Statute of Frauds were applied within the limits of … English Sales of Goods Act was given by Mellor, K., in Jones v. Just, (1868) 3 QB 197.(12) Section 15 of the Act III of 1930 covers sale by description as in the case here where the description

Petlad Bulakhidas Mills Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 14, 15 and 72

Reported in : AIR1970Guj59; (1970)0GLR330

of 1961 is dismissed with costs.26. Order accordingly. Contract - agreement - Sections 14, 15 and 72 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 - second appeal against Order of District Judge allowing appeal of respondent - as per general clause of … and the duress.'It appears that the ratio laid down by the learned Extra Assistant Judge is quite correct.16. Section 15 of the Indian Contract Act defines 'coercion' as under:-' 'Coercion' is the committing or threatening to commit, any

Mohanlal Soni and anr. Vs. the Director, Directorate of Urban Land and ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2008(1)WLN329

tax said to be paid in excess.4. With strong support of the provisions of Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the contention of counsel for the petitioners is that one time tax was demanded from the petitioners and … and Anr. v. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. AIR 2001 Rajasthan 288, while declaring Section 13(1)(b) and Section 15(b) of the Rajasthan Land & Building Tax Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1964') ultravires

Sanjay Puri Vs. Radhey Lal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2, 15 and 16; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 9 and 54; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 111; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20

Reported in : 2006(2)CTLJ159(Del); 2006(91)DRJ471

there was undue influence exercised by the plaintiff when defendant signed Ex.PW-1/1.39. Section 15 and 16 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 define coercion and undue influence respectively. They read as under:15. 'Coercion' defined.- 'Coercion' is the committing, or threatening

M/s. Mascon Multiservices and Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bharat Oman Re ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

making such a claim. Mr. Andhyarujina would argue that Clause 47 is void under Section 28(b) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Section 28 of the ICA runs thus: 28. Agreements in restraint of legal proceedings, void. - Every agreement, - … of the Act when the petitioner admittedly sought time to do same work which evidence has been considered. 15. The learned Arbitrator has considered the law relating to the claim, the extent of the bank guarantee given

Suguna and K. Devi Vs. Vinod G. Nehemiah and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 16, 16(2) and 16(3); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Evidence Act - Sections 111 and 230A; Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rules 2 and 4

Reported in : 2008(2)CTC433; 2008(2)CTLJ223(Mad); (2008)5MLJ167

undue influence and fraud played on, it was pointed out that with reference to Section 16(3) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the first appellant admitted that she maintained a fiduciary relationship with the deceased Nehemiah; as such, she was … Chitra Venkataraman, J.1. These two appeals arise out of the common judgment and decree passed in C.S. No. 153 of 2002 and Tr.C.S. No. 374 of 2002 dated 12.9.2007. O.S.A. No. 330 of 2007 arises out of