Advanced Search Results

Benoari Lal Sarma and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1943Cal285

and 25, European Vagrancy Act, 1874 (9 of 1874); (h) any offence under Sections 2, 3 and 18, Howrah Offences Act, 1857 (31 of 1857); (i) any offence under Section 34, Calcutta Suburban Police Act, 1866 (Bengal Act 2 of

Suraj Prakash and ors. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Public Gambling Act, 1867 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 9; Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : AIR1964All95; 1964CriLJ319

XIII of 1856, which correspond with I Sections 10-15 of Act No. XXI of 1857. (The Calcutta and Howrah Police and Conservancy Act.) These Sections. 10-15 have, in the form of Rules, teen for some years in … public street, place or thoroughfare. Section 14 of the Act requires that offences punishable under the Act shall be triable by any Magistrate having jurisdiction … would be forfeited to the State or paid to persons who, in his opinion, are entitled toreceive it. Section 9 provides that in order to convict a person of keeping a common gaming house or of being concerned

J.N. Gupta Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : West Bengal Prize Competition Act, 1957 - Section 19; ;Constitution of India; ;Prize Competition Act, 1955 - Sections 4 and 5

Reported in : AIR1959Cal141,1959CriLJ307

'gambling' in the several repealed Acts which are mentioned in Section 18 of the said Act, namely the Howrah Offences Act, 1857, the Calcutta Police Act, 1866 and the Bengal Public Gambling Act, 1867. It is, therefore, argued that so

R.E. Marriott Vs. Municipality of Howrah

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : AIR1941Cal319

Railway tinder Section 14, Licensed Warehouse and Fire Brigade Act of 1893. A complaint on behalf of the Howrah Municipality was originally filed on 31st March 1939 against the Superintendent, Way and Works, Bast Indian Railway. It … in which it would be impossible to prosecute a company, for example, in connexion with murder or other offences involving personal violence: Rex v. Cory Bros. & Co (1927) 1KB 810. It is nevertheless clear from the … Bose contends that there is no provision in the Railways Act (Act 9 of 1890) or any other law, under which it is possible to

Bikash Roy Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Sections 17, 17(1) and 20; ;Bargadar Rules - Rule 9

Reported in : 2008(1)CHN554

the owner of Plot No. 937, Khatian No. 1853, Mouza Naul, Police Station Shyampur in the district of Howrah while Ashim Mondal and two others [petitioners in W.P. No. 23765 (W) of 2006] claim to be owners … lands by the petitioners is absolutely illegal and arbitrary. He urged that in view of commission of cognizable offences by the private respondent, the police authorities ought to have taken appropriate steps on the basis of the … to be owners of Plot No. 937, Khatian Nos. 1858, 1851 and 1857 respectively within the same mouza as aforesaid. It is their claim that … Case No. 30/97 under Section 17(1)(a)(b)(c) of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act (hereafter the said Act) for termination of barga cultivation by the private … claims to be the owner of Plot No. 937, Khatian No. 1853, Mouza Naul, Police Station Shyampur