Advanced Search Results

Prasad Maity. Vs. Krishnapada Mondal.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 227; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Section 33, 2(14), 2(6), 2 (10), 35, 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 2(14)

situated in the areas to which the Kolkata Improvement Act, 1911 (Ben. Act V of 1911), or the Howrah Improvement Act, 1956 (West Ben. Act XIV of 1956), extends; (b) Co-partnership Deed, See Partnership (No.46). (b) six per centum of … admitted in evidence. 5. Mrs. Mitra, learned advocate appearing for the defendant/petitioner referred to the provisions contained in Section 33 of the Act read with Section 2(14), 2(6), 2 (10) as well as entry 23 of Schedule

Afjal Imam. Vs. State of Bihar and Others.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Municipal Act, 2007 -Sections 21 (3), 27, 25(4), 17, 25 (4), 23 (3), 21 (3), 21 (4) ; atna Municipal Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 36, 20 (d), '; Howrah Act - Sections 6 (2), 7 (d) ; Calcutta Act - Section 8 (2), 9 (d)(e) ; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Section 37 ; M.P. and Chattisgarh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Section 70 ; Forest Act 1927 - Sections 52 (3)

neighbouring State of West Bengal under the system of `Mayor-in-council' under the Howrah Muncipal Corporation Act, 1980 and Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980, the Mayor … of weaker sections of society, including the handicapped and mentally retarded.10. Slum improvement and upgradation.11. Urban poverty alleviation.12. Provision of urban amenities and facilities such … the Act.(ii) Similar is the provision in Madhya Pradesh under section 37 of the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 (the section in the present form is since 1998 Amendment). The Mayor, who is elected by the Councillors … old Council members or appoint new members in their place.(iii) The same is the effect and import of section 70 (in place since the 1998 Amendment) of the M.P. and Chattisgarh Municipalities Act, 1961. Section 70 deals with

M. Sreenivasulu Reddy and ors. Vs. Kishore R. Chhabria and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 87, 111 and 111A; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 11, 11B, 15I, 15Y and 20A; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1994 - Regulations 2, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 33, 37, 39; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulations 10, 11 and 12

Reported in : [2002]109CompCas18(Bom)

the 1997 Regulations by bringing in indirect acquisition. He referred to the judgments of the Supreme Court in Howrah Trading Co. Ltd, v. CIT : [1959]36ITR215(SC) and Balkrishan Gupta v. Swadeshi Polytex Ltd. : [1985]2SCR854 ; to … Bank v. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd. [1995] 84 Comp Cas 70. He submitted that these plaintiffs in the second suit will follow their … para. 2 of the order :'These items include proposed resolutions under Sections 257 and 284 of the Companies Act, 1956.'20. Counter Suit No. 297 of 1997 and Notice of Motion No. 184 of 1999 therein: Defendants Nos. 3, … to as 'the SEBI Regulations of 1994'). These regulations are framed under Section 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter

Workmen of Continental Commercial Company (Private), Ltd. Vs. Governme ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1962)ILLJ85Cal

not be in any particular form. In a decision of the Labour Appellate Tribunal, Bhutoria Jute Mills v. Howrah Zillah Chatkal Mazdoor Union 1956 L.A.C. 719, it has been held that a notice under Section 19 of … various unions of workmen, fourteen headings have been set out. First; of all, there is a demand for improved grade and scale of pay including fixation of minimum wages. The demand is that the minimum basic wages … that there was no form of notice prescribed by the Industrial Disputes Act or the rules framed thereunder for terminating an agreement of the nature … the company and on the merit of the employees concerned)-- Grade A--Rs. 70-4-134.Grade B--Rs. 60-2/8-90 (Matriculate),Grade C--Rs. 55-2/8-80 (non-Marticulate).(2) Dearness allowance.--Grade A--Rs. 40, Grades B

Kusum Chand and anr. Vs. Kanhaiyalal and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR1974Raj73; 1973()WLN408

Limitation Act for condoning the delay. He placed reliance on the State of West Bengal v. The Administrator. Howrah Municipality, AIR 1972 SC 749. The learned counsel, Mr. Kasliwal engaged to prefer the appeal consulted the Rajasthan … in Rajasthan Courts.The trial court decreed the plaintiffs suit on May 23, 1956. An appeal was taken in the Court of the District Judge, Jaipur … of resorting to the English word 'goodwill'. It appears that after having said 'Aadat' the plaintiff tried to improve upon it by fusing it with the concept of goodwill later in his own deposition. The expression 'goodwill', … who found that the Civil Judge had no jurisdiction on account of Section 28 of the Bombay Rent Control Act, 1947. The matter came before … landlord Chhaganlal would pay a sum of. Rs 700/- perannum to the plaintiff on account of goodwill.