Advanced Search Results

M. Sreenivasulu Reddy and ors. Vs. Kishore R. Chhabria and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 87, 111 and 111A; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 11, 11B, 15I, 15Y and 20A; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1994 - Regulations 2, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 33, 37, 39; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulations 10, 11 and 12

Reported in : [2002]109CompCas18(Bom)

the 1997 Regulations by bringing in indirect acquisition. He referred to the judgments of the Supreme Court in Howrah Trading Co. Ltd, v. CIT : [1959]36ITR215(SC) and Balkrishan Gupta v. Swadeshi Polytex Ltd. : [1985]2SCR854 ; to … reliance on the definition of the term 'with' as defined at page 58 of Words and Phrases, Paramount edition, volume 46. Therein the term 'robbery … para. 2 of the order :'These items include proposed resolutions under Sections 257 and 284 of the Companies Act, 1956.'20. Counter Suit No. 297 of 1997 and Notice of Motion No. 184 of 1999 therein: Defendants Nos. 3, … to as 'the SEBI Regulations of 1994'). These regulations are framed under Section 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter

Union of India Vs. Ibrahim UddIn and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure(CPC) 1908 - Order 41 Rule 27, Order 7 Rule 17, Section 100; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114(g), 58, 17 to 31, 68, 65, 74, 90; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34 ; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Section 43A

Anr. v. Sunil Kumar Singh Negi, AIR 2008 SC 2026; The Secretary & Curator, Victoria Memorial Hall v. Howrah Ganatantrik Nagrik Samity & Ors., AIR 2010 SC 1285; and Sant Lal Gupta & Ors. v. Modern Cooperative … & Ors., (2010) 13 SCC 336).34. In The Land Acquisition Officer, City Improvement Trust Board, Bangalore v. H. Narayanaiah etc. etc., AIR 1976 SC 2403, … & Ors. v. B.Shama Rao & Ors., AIR 1956 SC 593, this Court held that admission made … but the defendant No.1 did not produce any paper against the Will. Therefore, it has been given in section 58 of the Evidence that if the defendant does not produce any paper in rebuttal, then it means that … in an unauthorised manner on 22.2.1993 and afterwards, thus the cause of action arose to approach the court.B. The defendant no.1/appellant filed the written statement