Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: howrah improvement act 1956 section 56 · Page 1 of about 2 results (0.031 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 19 1999

M. Sreenivasulu Reddy and ors. Vs. Kishore R. Chhabria and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-19-1999

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 87, 111 and 111A; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 11, 11B, 15I, 15Y and 20A; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1994 - Regulations 2, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 33, 37, 39; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulations 10, 11 and 12

Reported in : [2002]109CompCas18(Bom)

the 1997 Regulations by bringing in indirect acquisition. He referred to the judgments of the Supreme Court in Howrah Trading Co. Ltd, v. CIT : [1959]36ITR215(SC) and Balkrishan Gupta v. Swadeshi Polytex Ltd. : [1985]2SCR854 ; to … para. 2 of the order :'These items include proposed resolutions under Sections 257 and 284 of the Companies Act, 1956.'20. Counter Suit No. 297 of 1997 and Notice of Motion No. 184 of 1999 therein: Defendants Nos. 3, … to as 'the SEBI Regulations of 1994'). These regulations are framed under Section 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1966

Bijoy Kr. Sadhukhan Vs. Income-tax Officer Non Companies

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-04-1966

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 34(1)

Reported in : AIR1966Cal597

blank Return Forms, on the plea of having to file Revised Returns before the Respondent No. 2--Income-tax Officer, Howrah, might have filled in the said Return Forms and filed them up before the Respondent No. 2--Income-tax Officer, … while fixing the period allowed for payment and also the rate of instalment. Other measures envisaged relate to improvement of the administrative organization of the department and rationalisation and simplification of the existing procedure with a view … He obtained six Rules being Civil Rule Nos. 1842 to 1847 of 1956. Those Rules were made absolute by J.P. Mitter, J. on March 3, … to income-tax by the respondent No. 2 Income-tax Officer, under the Income-tax Act, 1922, on the basis of returns filed by him. The demands made … not appear that demands for these taxes, under Section 29 of the Income-tax Act, 1922, had been

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial