Advanced Search Results
Lakshmimoni Das and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Kolkata
Jul-08-1987
Tenancy
Calcutta Thika Tenancy (Acquisition and Regulation) Act, 1981 - Sections 5, 6(2), 8(2), 8(3), 19 and 27; ;Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, 1949; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 25, 26, 31C and 39; ;Calcutta Thika Tenancy (Acquisition and Regulation) Rules, 1982 - Rules 3, 5 and 5(1)
AIR1987Cal326,(1987)1CALLT371(HC),92CWN72
of the Constitution has been totally ignored in the 1981 Act. The owners of land in Calcutta and Howrah comprising thika tenancy have been affected by the impugned Act and the impugned Act has created further inequalities … as may be prescribed and without submitting a comprehensive development plan or improvement scheme for the holding construct pucca structure. Any such scheme shall provide … improved status to bharatia. Even before the impugned Act, the bharatia was governed by West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 and no better protection has been given to the said bharatia under the impugned Act. Mr. Pal has … the Constitutional Limitations' appearing at pp. 143 and 149 have been referred to by Mr. Pal. The … scope, ambit and effect of the provision of vesting as contained in Section 5 of the impugned Act? (b) Whether the impugned Act is ultra
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Sreenivasulu Reddy and ors. Vs. Kishore R. Chhabria and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-19-1999
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 87, 111 and 111A; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 11, 11B, 15I, 15Y and 20A; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1994 - Regulations 2, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 33, 37, 39; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulations 10, 11 and 12
[2002]109CompCas18(Bom)
the 1997 Regulations by bringing in indirect acquisition. He referred to the judgments of the Supreme Court in Howrah Trading Co. Ltd, v. CIT : [1959]36ITR215(SC) and Balkrishan Gupta v. Swadeshi Polytex Ltd. : [1985]2SCR854 ; to … para. 2 of the order :'These items include proposed resolutions under Sections 257 and 284 of the Companies Act, 1956.'20. Counter Suit No. 297 of 1997 and Notice of Motion No. 184 of 1999 therein: Defendants Nos. 3, … to as 'the SEBI Regulations of 1994'). These regulations are framed under Section 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›