Advanced Search Results
Pijush Kanti Ghosh Vs. Sm. Maya Rani Chatterjee and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-24-1970
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Section 110, 110A, 110A(3), 110B, 110C and 110D; ;Limitation Act - Section 5; ;Constitution of India - Article 245; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
AIR1971Cal229
award made in Motor Accident Claim Case No. 17 of 1964 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Howrah which is also the Tribunal for Calcutta and 24-Parganas. The claim was preferred by Maya Rani Chatterjee and … 1939 (Act IV of 1939) by later amendments by Act 100 of 1956. We will briefly give our reasons for that view we take. 14. … the Insurer. 15. After the provisions in Sections 103 to 109 (which are not relevant for this … she was ill for about six months. Only after she recovered from that illness and her mental condition improved, in February, 1964 Maya Rani's uncle, P.W. 8 Birendra Kumar Ghatak informed Maya Rani that Gopal had died … special law of limitation under Section 110-A (3) of the Motor Vehicles Act. 8. In the objection filed by Pijush Kanti Ghosh it was denied
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBijoy Kr. Sadhukhan Vs. Income-tax Officer Non Companies
Kolkata
Mar-04-1966
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 34(1)
AIR1966Cal597
blank Return Forms, on the plea of having to file Revised Returns before the Respondent No. 2--Income-tax Officer, Howrah, might have filled in the said Return Forms and filed them up before the Respondent No. 2--Income-tax Officer, … while fixing the period allowed for payment and also the rate of instalment. Other measures envisaged relate to improvement of the administrative organization of the department and rationalisation and simplification of the existing procedure with a view … He obtained six Rules being Civil Rule Nos. 1842 to 1847 of 1956. Those Rules were made absolute by J.P. Mitter, J. on March 3, … to income-tax by the respondent No. 2 Income-tax Officer, under the Income-tax Act, 1922, on the basis of returns filed by him. The demands made … not appear that demands for these taxes, under Section 29 of the Income-tax Act, 1922, had been … the income as hereinafter stated:1938-39...Rs. 95,729/-1939-40...Rs. 92,368/-1940-41...Rs. 92,907/-1941-42...Rs. 103,377/-1942-43...Rs. 94,802/-1943-44...Rs. 100,758/-He further ordered as follows:'Work out tax
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›