Advanced Search Results

M/S. Subbhash Chander Kamlesh Kumar Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Commercial Constitution

Acts : Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 5, 6, 6(1), 6(3), 7, 10, 13, 13(1), 15, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33-A, 33-B, 38 and 43; Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets (General) Rules, 1962 - Rules 2(9), 13, 17, 18(1), 23, 24, 24-B, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29(1), 29 (2), 29(7), 30, 31 and 31(9); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 141, 245, 246 and 265; Haryana Rural Development Act, 1986 - Sections 5 and 6(5); Punjab Rural Development Act, 1987; The Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1976; Punjab Agricultural Produce Market (Haryana Amendment and Validation) Act, 1980; Haryana Rural Development Fund Act, 1983; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966 - Sections 7 (6); Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets

Reported in : AIR1990P& H259; (1990)98PLR666

Matched in: Court Punjab and Haryana

B.L. Wadhera Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulations) Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 4, 4(1), 5, 5A, 5B, 15 and 15(2); Indian Forest Act; Forest Conservation Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Gram Panchayat Rules - Rule 34; Punjab Common Lands Act, 1964 - Sections 13; Punjab Village Common (Regulations) Rules, 1964 - Rules 3(1), 3(2), 6, 6(10), 10, 13 and 13A; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 122 and 123; Constitution of India - Article 32; Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972; Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1976

Reported in : AIR2002SC1913; JT2002(4)SC271; (2002)3PLR248; 2002(3)SCALE714; (2002)9SCC108; [2002]3SCR226

the country is accused of usurping about 600 acres of land in Village Bhondsi of the State of Haryana by manipulation and resort to exercise of his political influence. Moved by an article 'Lord of the Land' … is against the provisions of the punjab Village Common Lands (Regulations) Act, 1961, the Rules made thereunder, Indian Forest Act and the Forest conservation Act, 1980.2. In the article 'Lord of the Land' published in India Today, … of Village Bhondsi met the deponent and urged him to undertaken to development programmes in their area. The Gram Panchayat undertook to extend all possible … stated that after the respondent No.7 completed his so-called Bharat Yatra in 1983, he formed the Trust known as 'Bharat Yatra Kendra' (hereinafter referred to … from rural areas as well as the weaker sections of the society in the field of weaving, … constructed a sprawling farm-house where 35 cows yielding 83 litres of milk everyday are kept. A multi-storeyed

Residents Welfare Association Vs. The Union Territory Of Chandigarh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

submitted that the provisions of the 2001 Rules are similar to the provisions of the Haryana Apartment Ownership Act, 1983. He submitted that under the 2001 Rules, each apartment owner is entitled to the exclusive ownership and possession … an addition of 1,54,051 during the last decade. He further submitted that, as a matter of fact, the forest coverage in Chandigarh has doubled in the last 20 years.31. Shri Tewari submitted that a ‘transferee’ has been … having Sectors 31 to 47. Phase­ I was designed for low­rise plotted development for a total population of 1,50,000. Phase­II Sectors were to have a … 1960, the Government of Punjab, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sections 5 and 22 of the 1952 Act, made the Chandigarh (Sale of … submitted by them while applying for occupation certificate. 812. The High Court, vide order dated 15th September

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3) and 23; National Capital Region Planning Board Act, 1985 - Sections 2; Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 - Sections 4 and 5; Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 - Rules 5, 5(3), 5(4) and 6(3); Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Town and Country Planning Act; National Environment Appellate Authority Act, 1997; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 47, 48A and 51A; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Rules; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 13 and 18; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 4A, 22(4), 22(4A) and 22(5); Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Mineral Conservation and Dev

Reported in : AIR2004SC4016; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)353; (2004)3CompLJ199(SC); JT2004(4)SC181; 2004(3)SCALE396; (2004)12SCC118

will be drastically reduce and run-off leading to recharge of constantly depleting ground water resources. It records that Haryana Forest Department has implemented a project on the eco-restoration of common tends in the Aravalli hills, from June 1990 … 41 contained in Chapter V of the Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, 1983 framed under Section 18 of the MMRD Act deal with the measures … Regulatory measures on ground water development have been imposed in these areas. 8. Therefore, it is observed that dewatering of mines in Aravalli hills has … mining activity in close proximity to the residential area and/or main roads carrying traffic.Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act and Rules thereunder50. The grant of mining lease is governed by the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development)

Gujarat Forest Producers, Gatherers and Forest Workers Union Vs. State ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : EnvironmentConstitution

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; 7A 33(1) and 33C(2) ;Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 2(1) ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 23.3, 39B, 46, 48A, 51A, 141, 166, 298, 309, 310 and 311; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 2; Monopolies and Restrictive trade Practice Act, 1969 - Sections 2; Indian Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 4, 5 and 8

Reported in : (2004)2GLR568; (2004)IIILLJ259Guj

reported in : (1988)IILLJ149SC , was cited to point out that the Irrigation Department of the Punjab & Haryana State was held to be falling within the ambit of 'industry' under section 2(j) of the Act. The … referring them to the Larger Bench in the following terms;'(1) Whether the Forest Department and the Irrigation Department of the State can be said to … resource, a basic human need and a precious national asset and planning development and management of water resources was needed to be governed by national … be made in such land except in accordance with the rules. The powers of Settlement Officer are under Section 8 who is authorized to survey, demarcate and make a map. In all these activities, staff has to be

Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti and ors. Vs. Orient Paper and Industries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India; Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 3, 4, 6, 7, 17, 19, 19(2), 31, 32, 38, 39, 43 and 44

Reported in : JT1994(7)SC414; 1994(4)SCALE914; (1995)1SCC655; [1994]Supp5SCR392

[1987]164ITR376(SC) what fell for consideration was the cess imposed under Section 3 of the Haryana Rural Development Fund Act, 1983. The cess was imposed on ad valorem basis at the rate of one per cent of the sale … is a decision of a Bench of three learned Judges, the levy of cess under the Haryana Rural Development Act, 1986 fell for consideration. The Court held that from the scheme of the Act, it would be clear … the State Government which holds monopoly in regard to bamboos as a forest produce in view of the provisions of the M.P. Van Upaj [Vyapar … M.P. Van Upaj [Vyapar Viniyaman] Sanshodhan Adhiniyam, 1986 [No. 15 of 1987]. 8. We are not concerned in this appeal with the vires of the

Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union Territory of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Municipal Corporation of Delhi Act - Sections 42, 405, 406 and 407

Reported in : ILR1995Delhi49

report submitted in January, 1983 by the then Development Commissioner Delhi in which it is mentioned that … scale has created havoc in the lives of people living in Delhi, Haryana and U.P. It is averred in the petition that about 13,000 litres … Pollution Control Act 1974, Section 16 of the Air Pollution Act, 1981, Aircraft Rules, 1973, National Health Services Act 1983. In substance the main submission of the counsel for the petitioner has been that wholesome water and pure … the obligation of the occupier regarding clean drinking water and food to be provided to the animals and Section 8 provides that each animal should have sufficient space to stand up, lie down and turn around and easy … the petition, it is also mentioned that the Ministry of Environment, and Forests had directed the Delhi Municipal Committee to set up, an effluent treatment

Om Parkash Agarwal and ors. Vs. Giri Raj Kishori and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 - Sections 6; Haryana Rural Development Fund Act, 1983 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 4(1), 4(3), 4(4), 4(5), 5, 6, 7 and 8; Constitution of India - Articles 46, 47, 48 and 48A; Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act, 1952

Reported in : AIR1986SC1707; [1987]164ITR376(SC); 1986(1)SCALE110; (1986)1SCC722; [1986]1SCR149; 1986(1)LC394(SC)

Matched in: Advocate V.M. Tarkunde,; Shankar Ghosh,; P.N. Puri,; Kapil Sibbal, ; H.L. Sibbal Advocate General for state of Haryana, ;

Wood Work Handicraft Association Vs. State (Forest) and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : MRTP

Raj Kishori and ors. (AIR 198.SC726) wherein it was held that levy of cess under section 3 of Haryana Rural Development Fund Act cannot be said to be fee as quid pro quo is absent; it cannot … In this petition, the petitioner-Association has questioned the amendments made in Rules 6 and 7 of the Rajasthan Forest Produce (Establishment & Regulation of Saw Mills) Rules, 1983 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules of 1983). By … to be excessive or oppressive or restrictive on the right of the 8 members of the petitioner-Association to carry on their occupation or trade or

Sanjeev Nath Bhaskar and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CriminalEnvironment

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 52 and 53; Forest Conservation Act, 1980 - Sections 26; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379

Reported in : 2005CriLJ187

been followed in catena of decisions of the Apex Court as well as by this Court State of Haryana v. Chadhary Bhajan Lal, 1991 (28) ACC 111 : (AIR 1992 SC 604) (SC); Surendra Nath Mohanti v. … at case No. 140 of 1998 under Section 379 I.P.C., Section 26 Forest (Conservation Act) 1980 and Section 52/53 of the Mines Act 1952. Writ … the applicants as shown in the charge sheet and FIR. So far the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act 1957 is concerned, Act consists of only 33 Sections as such it is also beyond imagination that any … High Court and interim order was passed in favour of leasee on 8th August, 1988 by a Division Bench in pursuant thereof the applicants are