Advanced Search Results

New Delhi Municipal Council vs Bharat Hotels Ltd & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

no bye-laws made under clause (a) or clause (b) by the committee of a municipality in which the Hackney Carriage Act, 1879, is in force shall apply to any vehicle to which that Act applies: Provided also that operations of … that decision, in this regard,Digiltally Signed LPA 364/2024 & LPA 387/2024 Page 7 of 65of the appellant shall be final and binding on the respondent … as the “NDMC Act”) to form a municipal council for New Delhi, which came into force w.e.f. 25.05.1994.6.3. Section 3 of the NDMC Act provides that there shall be a Council charged with municipal government of New

New Delhi Municipal Council vs Bharat Hotels Ltd & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

no bye-laws made under clause (a) or clause (b) by the committee of a municipality in which the Hackney Carriage Act, 1879, is in force shall apply to any vehicle to which that Act applies: Provided also that operations of … that decision, in this regard,Digiltally Signed LPA 364/2024 & LPA 387/2024 Page 7 of 65of the appellant shall be final and binding on the respondent … as the “NDMC Act”) to form a municipal council for New Delhi, which came into force w.e.f. 25.05.1994.6.3. Section 3 of the NDMC Act provides that there shall be a Council charged with municipal government of New

Mewa Ram Vs. Municipal Board

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : AIR1939All466

irresistible when one compared the provisions of Section 298(2)II(b) of the Act with the provisions of Section 3, Hackney Carriage Act (14 of 1879) which provides about 'rules for the regulation and control of hackney carriages.' The words 'regulation … Wallis J. in C.S. No. 244 of Corporation of Madras v. Masthan Saib Reported in (1913) 21 M.L.J. 788 was followed.42. Learned Counsel has also cited Saundatti Yellama Municipality v. Shripadbhat Seshbhat (1933) 20 A.I.R. Bom. 132

Sardar Iqbal Singh and ors. Vs. the Municipal Board, Lucknow

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 298(1), 298(2) and 301; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(6) and 226

Reported in : AIR1959All186

in Calcutta in excess of the number of 6000. It appears that under Section 71 of the Calcutta Hackney Carriage Act, 1919, the Provincial Government was empowered to make bye-laws for carrying out the provisions and intentions of the … Board under bye-law No. 9 of the bye-laws published in the U. P. Gazette dated 4-1-1958 (Pausa 14, 1879 Saka Era) through notification No. 403 XXXII-10 (1) (1)-56-57 dated 27-12-1957, the Municipal Board, Lucknow, with a view … this decision some 1500 new applications for licences in respect of over 7000 rickshaws were made to the Board. The Municipal Board was of the

Ghulam MohiuddIn Vs. Munsiff of Etah and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 1(2) and 87A; Uttar Pradesh Town Areas Act, 1914 - Sections 38(1), 38(3) and 38(4)

Reported in : AIR1961All200

Boards and Committees.There may be similar transfer of power to the Board under other cognate Acts like the Hackney Carriage Act (Act XIV of 1879) or the Vaccination Act (Act XIII of 1880) and so on. The purpose of … which lead me to take a different view. The learned Judge was of opinion that the provisions of Sections 47-A and 87-A of the U. P. Municipalities Act, 1916, could not be extended to town areas substantially … ot India and Delhi Laws Act (1912) etc., In re, 1951 SCR 747 at p. 848: (AIR 1951 SG 332 at pp. 359-360), to give