Advanced Search Results

Mewa Ram Vs. Municipal Board

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : AIR1939All466

irresistible when one compared the provisions of Section 298(2)II(b) of the Act with the provisions of Section 3, Hackney Carriage Act (14 of 1879) which provides about 'rules for the regulation and control of hackney carriages.' The words 'regulation … Act, and Boards are enjoined to generally adopt those rules. These rules are to be found at p. 516 of the Municipal Manual printed in the year 1937. An examination of the Act and of the draft

New Delhi Municipal Council vs Bharat Hotels Ltd & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

no bye-laws made under clause (a) or clause (b) by the committee of a municipality in which the Hackney Carriage Act, 1879, is in force shall apply to any vehicle to which that Act applies: Provided also that operations of … 144/1979 before this Court forDigiltally Signed LPA 364/2024 & LPA 387/2024 Page 5 of 65specific performance of contract/damages. The said suit resulted in a compromise, … as the “NDMC Act”) to form a municipal council for New Delhi, which came into force w.e.f. 25.05.1994.6.3. Section 3 of the NDMC Act provides that there shall be a Council charged with municipal government of New

New Delhi Municipal Council vs Bharat Hotels Ltd & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

no bye-laws made under clause (a) or clause (b) by the committee of a municipality in which the Hackney Carriage Act, 1879, is in force shall apply to any vehicle to which that Act applies: Provided also that operations of … 144/1979 before this Court forDigiltally Signed LPA 364/2024 & LPA 387/2024 Page 5 of 65specific performance of contract/damages. The said suit resulted in a compromise, … as the “NDMC Act”) to form a municipal council for New Delhi, which came into force w.e.f. 25.05.1994.6.3. Section 3 of the NDMC Act provides that there shall be a Council charged with municipal government of New

Sardar Iqbal Singh and ors. Vs. the Municipal Board, Lucknow

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 298(1), 298(2) and 301; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(6) and 226

Reported in : AIR1959All186

in Calcutta in excess of the number of 6000. It appears that under Section 71 of the Calcutta Hackney Carriage Act, 1919, the Provincial Government was empowered to make bye-laws for carrying out the provisions and intentions of the … licence may only be refused 'in accordance with these bye-laws.' Bye-law No, 5 empowers the Executive Officer to fix and change carriage rates for hire, … Board under bye-law No. 9 of the bye-laws published in the U. P. Gazette dated 4-1-1958 (Pausa 14, 1879 Saka Era) through notification No. 403 XXXII-10 (1) (1)-56-57 dated 27-12-1957, the Municipal Board, Lucknow, with a view

Ghulam MohiuddIn Vs. Munsiff of Etah and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 1(2) and 87A; Uttar Pradesh Town Areas Act, 1914 - Sections 38(1), 38(3) and 38(4)

Reported in : AIR1961All200

Boards and Committees.There may be similar transfer of power to the Board under other cognate Acts like the Hackney Carriage Act (Act XIV of 1879) or the Vaccination Act (Act XIII of 1880) and so on. The purpose of … of the Act, and becomes subject to all the Municipal rules, regulations and bye-laws etc., as provided in Section 5 of the Municipalities Act.11. In this connection it is significant to note that similar provisions are also to

Little Vs. Hackett

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

was a member. While there, he dined at the West End Hotel, and after dinner hired a public hackney coach from a stand near the hotel and, taking a companion with him, was driven along the beach … was injured by the collision of a train of the Central Railroad Company of New Jersey with the carriage in which he was riding, and this action was brought to recover Page 116 U. S. 367 damages … Thorogood v. Bryan, 8 C.B. 115, disapproved. On the 28th of June, 1879, the plaintiff below, defendant in error here, was injured by the collision … control over the conduct of the driver, is not responsible for his acts or negligence, or prevented from recovering against a railroad company for injuries … & Yorkshire Railroad Co., L.R. 10 Exch. 47, 52. Assuming this to be the correct explanation, it