Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: general clauses act 1897 section 30a · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.040 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 03 1950

Keshab Chandra Choudhary Vs. Lokenath Jena and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Nov-03-1950

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Orissa Tenancy Act, 1913 - Sections 31, 31(2), 31(5), 31(6), 31A, 31A(1), 31A(2), 31B, 83 and 197; Orissa Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1938

Reported in : AIR1951Ori186

have been served on him. The entire Civil Procedure Code is based on this principle and Schedule 7, General Clauses Act, 1897 and the corresponding Schedule 9, Orissa General Clauses Act, 1937, merely reproduce this principle. There are several sections … is confirmed Sub-section (l) of Schedule 1A becomes otiose. The right of free transfer having been declared in Section 30A and the mode of transfer having been declared in Schedule 1 the transferee and the person possessing interest

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 1992

Miscellaneous Mazdoor Sabha Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-16-1992

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226 and 226(1); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2A, 10, 10A, 25, 25F, 25-O, 25-FFA, 25-FFF, 25FFF(1) and 30A

Reported in : (1992)2GLR1065; (1993)ILLJ695Guj

However, Art. 367 can be resorted to in this connection. It defines 'Unless the context otherwise requires, the General Clauses Act, 1897 shall, subject to any adaptations and modifications that may be made therein under Art. 227, apply for the … that light, it was observed that thereby, the employer had rendered itself liable to the penalty contemplated by Section 30A. Since the employer is a private limited company, it is presumed that all the then Directors and perhaps

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 1961

The Chief Inspector of Mines and anr. Vs. Lala Karam Chand Thapar Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-10-1961

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCriminal

Acts : Indian Coal Mines Regulations, 1926; Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 31(4); Mines (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 2(I), 73, 74 and 76; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24

Reported in : AIR1961SC838; [1961(3)FLR241]; (1961)IILLJ146SC; [1962]1SCR9

31 of the Mines Act, 1923, and on the other to the provisions of s. 24 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. The first sub-section of s. 31 provides that the power to make regulations and rules conferred by Sections … of s. 31 provides that the power to make regulations and rules conferred by Sections 29, 30 and 30A is subject to the condition of the regulation and rules being made after previous publication. The fourth sub-section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 10 2007

M.U.S. Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-10-2007

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : (2008)12VST123(P& H)

General Sales Tax Act, 1948 have been repealed. Sub-section (2) is in terms of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 (for short, 'the 1897 Act') and provides for eventualities enumerated therein in view of repealing of the 1948 … enforced under the corresponding provisions of this Act.(3) Notwithstanding such repeal,--(a) the provisions of Section 10A, 10B and 30A of the repealed Act and the Rules framed thereunder relating to tax concessions to industrial units and assessment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 1993

B.D.A. Breweries and Distilleries Ltd. and Others Vs. Cruickshank and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-30-1993

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act 1956 - 2(25), 10, 21, 23(2), 30, 193, 195, 212, 215, 220, 291(1), 293(1), 294, 324, 324A, 391 and 394

Reported in : [1996]85CompCas325(Bom)

Matched in: Advocate V.R. Manohar, Advocate-General, ;T.N. Subramaniam, ;Ajit Kapadia, ;Ms. Usha Purohit, ;Mahesh Jethmalani, ;Arif Bookwala, ;Pankaj Sawant, Advs., i/b., ;Shri Mulla and ;Mulla and ;Craigie Blunt and ;Car K.K. Venugopal, Senior Adv., ;M.G. Ramachandran, ;Parag Tripathi, ;Dwarkadas,; S.A. Divan, ;V.Z. Kankaria, Advs., i/b., ;Gagrat and Co.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2013

Us Airways, Inc. Vs. Mccutchen

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-16-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

In a §502(a)(3) action based on an equitable lien by agreement-like this one-the ERISA plan’s terms govern. Neither general unjust enrichment principles nor specific doctrines reflecting those principles-such as the double-recovery or common-fund rules invoked by McCutchen-can … medical expenses paid. App. to Pet. for Cert. 30a; see id., at 32a.      The Court of … and defenses” applied to §502(a)(3) suits, it held that the principle of unjust enrichment overrode US Airways’ reimbursement clause because the clause would leave McCutchen with less than full payment for his medical bills and would give … US Airways filed suit under §502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), which authorizes health-plan administrators to bring a civil action … invoked by McCutchen-can override the applicable contract. Pp. 5-11.           (a) Section 502(a)(3) authorizes the kinds of relief “typically available in equity” before the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 1991

Smt. Rajrani Sehgal Vs. Dr. Parshottam Lal and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-18-1991

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 87, 82, 114, 138, 276 and 278; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 62, 63 and 68; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1992Delhi134

in respect to the intention of the testator. After stating his age and his state of health in general, the deceased gave details of his entire properties, moveable as well immoveable including the bank account, insurance policy, … help, as each will have to be construed in its own terms, in the setting in which the clauses occur.10 Mr. Makhija appearing for respondent No. 1, rightly argued that the foremost task of the court is … of administration under the provisions of Section 276/278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short 'the Act) was filed by respondent No. I on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 1923

Nanda Lal Agrani Vs. Jogendra Chandra Datta

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-18-1923

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 82Ind.Cas.297

to Rs. 615.4. The determination of the question now raised before us depends upon the true construction of Clauses 4 and 5 of Schedule I of the Court Fees Act. Article 4 provides that the proper fee … in Butter and Baker's case (1591) 3 Co. Rep. 25a at p. 30a; 78 E.R. 681, 'the law will never make any fiction, but for … Bengal Court Fees (Amendment) Act, (IV of 1922 B.C.) had come into force on the 1st April, 1922. Section 5 of this amending Statute modified Article 1 of Schedule I of the Court Fees Act, 1870, by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial