Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Iii Vs. Poonjabhai Vanmalidas
Gujarat
Feb-27-1976
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 23(2), 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 34(1), 35, 36, 36(1), 36(2), 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 41(1), 41(2), 41(3), 41(4), 42, 43A, 99, 128, 128(4), 155(6), 156, 261, 297, 297(1) aznd 297(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24
[1976]105ITR388(Guj)
In the alternative, he contended that the case is covered by the provisions of section 24 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, and the order must be deemed to have been made under section 36(1)(vii) of the Act which is … Income-tax (Amendment) Act of 1939. Under section 29 of the Act of 1961 the income referred to in section 28, that is, income chargeable to tax under the head 'profits and gains of business or profession' has to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kadri Mills (Coimbatore) Ltd.
Chennai
Aug-24-1976
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(35)
[1977]106ITR846(Mad)
'month' his to be reckoned according to the English calendar as provided for in Section 3(35) of the General Clauses Act, 1897, and if so reckoned the assessee has filed the return within a month from January 15, 1962, and, … directing to wait till January 31, 1962, and issue penalty notice. On February 2, 1962, notice under Section 28(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, was issued to the company to show cause why a penalty should
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Balakrishna Pillai Vs. State
Kerala
Sep-21-1995
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1), 5(2), 5(3) and 6; Evidence Act - Sections 145; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 29 and 161 to 165-A; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 28, 28(1), 28(4) and 52; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 271, 271(1), 274(1), 275, 277, 297, 297(1) and 297(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 30, 31, 161, 162, 170(5), 173, 173(2), 197, 197(1), 239, 240, 291 and 321; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 227 and 251A; Constitution of India - Article 20 and 20(1)
1996CriLJ757
Matched in: Advocate T.V. Prabhakaran and; S. Rajeev, Advs. Ratna Singh, Director General of Prosecution
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ramsons Southend Vs. Division Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. an ...
Delhi
Nov-01-1997
InsuranceLimitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 44; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 27; General Clause Act, 1987 - Sections 9; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28
1998IAD(Delhi)484; 71(1998)DLT842; 1998(44)DRJ677
cannot be delivered on the same day.18. In this regard, we must refer to Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 also. Section 27 reads as under :'27 Meaning of service by post - Where any [Central Act] or … arbitration? (b) If point (a) is decided in negative, whether part 4 of clause 9 is hit by Section 28 of the Contract Act? (c) If point No. (b) is decided in affirmative what is the date of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Tarkeshwar Sio Thakur Jiu Vs. Dar Dass Dey and Co. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-06-1979
Property
West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 6(1), 27 and 28; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 3, 105, 107 and 108; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Indian Easements Act - Sections 52; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(26)
AIR1979SC1669; (1979)3SCC106; [1979]3SCR18
Section 2 of Mines Act, 1952, Section 52 of Indian Easement Act, 1882 and Section 3 (26) of General Clauses Act, 1897 - appellant who was intermediary in respect of land in dispute granted mining lease to respondents which was … it would still operate as a lease from month to month; (b) it was not a licence; and(c) Section 28 of the Act applied and, as the plaintiff was not directly working the mine in the land, he
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Aligarh Muslim University Through Its Vice-chancellor Vs. Malay Sh ...
Allahabad
Jan-05-2006
Constitution
Aligarh Muslim University (Amendment) Act, 1981 - Sections 2(1), 5(2), 8, 16, 17, 18, 20A, 21, 22, 23, 26, 26A, 27, 28, 29, 31, 34 and 35; Aligarh Muslim University Act, 1920 - Sections 2, 3, 5(9A), 6, 8, 12(2) 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(5), 14, 15, 19, 22, 23, 24, 28, 29, 28(1), 28(2), 30, 30(2), 32, 32(1), 36, 36(2), 40 and 40(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(28); Constitution of India - Articles 26, 28(2), 29(2), 30, 30(1), 32, 226, 245 and 246; Gujarat Panchayat Act, 1961 - Sections 11(1); Kerala University Act, 1969 - Sections 48 and 49; Gujarat University Act, 1949 - Sections 33A
2006(1)AWC992
granted.25. India of 1920 is not same as the India of 2005 or 2006. Section 3(28) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 as amended up to date clearly says that the India of 1920 is British India; we do not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHungerford Investment Trust Ltd. Vs. Haridas Mundhra and ors.
Kolkata
Sep-14-1970
ContractCivil
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 28 and 28(1); ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; ;Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Section 35; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11, 100 and 101; ;Constitution of India - Article 133
AIR1971Cal182,75CWN517
Act 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the new Act), and also Section 6(c) and Section 6(e) of the General Clauses Act 1897. In order to appreciate the rival contentions of the parties it is necessary to set out the relevant … maintainable under Section 35(c) of the Specific Relief Act 1877 (hereinafter referred to as the old Act) and Section 28(4) read with Section 3(a) of the Specific Relief Act 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the new Act), and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaranbhai Chhaganbhai Vs. Motibhai Ishwarbhai
Mumbai
Aug-13-1954
ContractLimitation
Limitation Act, 1859; Limitation Act, 1871; Limitation Act, 1877 - Sections 2; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 28 - Schedule - Article 64; Baroda Limitation Act, 1887 - Schedule - Articles 47, 54 and 63; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 6(1); Baroda Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1934; Baroda Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1936; Baroda Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1939; Interpretation Act - Sections 39; Baroda General Clauses Act - Sections 11; Baroda, Samanya Kalvano Nibandh of Corresponding Act, 1951 - Sections 11
AIR1955Bom406; (1955)57BOMLR509
barred by reason of Section 11 of the Baroda General Clauses Act (corresponding with Section 6 of the General Clauses Act 1897), which provided that a repeal would not revive 'anything' not in force or existing at the time at … where the right of the plaintiff is extinguished, for example, by operation of a provision like that in Section 28 of the Limitation Act, its repeal would not revive the right unless the repealing Act so provides expressly
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaldev Band and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Delhi
Jan-04-1983
Criminal
Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Sections 28(1) and 28(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 23 and 23(1)
1983CriLJ787
the regulations. The statutory regulations are deemed to be rules fro the purposes of Section 23 of the General Clauses Act 1897. Section 23 of the General Clauses Act refers to rules and bye-laws and not regulations. thereforee a specific reference … obstruction, inconvenience or nuisance to traffic on the roads. As for the legal submissions, it is contended that Section 28(1)(b) of the Delhi Police Act, 1978, is ultra virus as it gives unguided arbitrary powers to Police authorities
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Oriental Insurance Company Limited, United India Building 4th Floo ...
Chennai
Apr-12-2001
InsuranceContract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28 and 78; Indian Contract (Amendment) Act, 1997; Limitation Act, 1965 - Schedule - Sections 4; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 10; Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 110
AIR2001Mad489
but only by a contractual term, neither Section 4 of Limitation Act, 1908 nor Section, 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 applied. The Bench has further held that even then the principle embodied in those sections and summed up … for the respondent/plaintiff has raised the following contentions:-(i) Condition No.19 of the policy is void as per amended Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act; (ii) Inasmuch as the appeal is the extension of the suit, it would
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »