Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: general clauses act 1897 section 25 · Page 1 of about 2,767 results (0.093 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 08 2007

Shanti Lal Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-08-2007

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 18, 27, 27(2), 56, 57, 57(1), 58, 58(1), 59, 60, 65 and 65(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 40, 41, 42, 63 to 70 and 304; Towns Nuisances Act (Madras), 1889 - Sections 3 and 3(10); Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923; Bihar Wakfs Act, 1947 - Sections 58; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 29, 30, 30(1) and 33; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 33

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR2814; 2008CriLJ386; JT2007(12)SC1; 2008(1)KLT503(SC); 2008(1)MPHT1(SC)

term awardable by the Magistrate under Section 29.18. We may as well refer to Section 25 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 which states;25. Recovery of fines.- Sections 63 to 70 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1976

Hari Shanker Tripathi Vs. Shiv Harsh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-03-1976

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951- Sections 2(1), 37, 39(1), 81, 81(1), 86(1) and 87(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 10; Indian Limitation Act, 1877 - Sections 4 and 5; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 25; Patna High Court Rules - Rules 6, 7 and 26; Allahabad High Court Rules - Rules 3, 4 and 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : (1976)1SCC897; [1976]3SCR308; 1976(8)LC242(SC)

therefore, claimed that his petition was not time-barred in view of the provisions of Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 which would apply to this case.3. The learned Counsel for the appellant has reiterated the same argument before … Act. 'public holiday' was defined as meaning any day which is a public holiday for the purposes of Section 25 of the Negotiable instruments Act, 1881. It was contended that as the notification issued by the High Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1998

M/S. Saudi Arabian Airlines Vs. Mrs. Shehnaz Mudbhatkal and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-25-1998

Subject : Labour and IndustrialFood Adulteration

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1) and 2, 11-A, 12(5), 17 and 25; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1996; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 58(3); Air Corporations Act, 1953; Constitution of India - Articles 20(1), 226 and 227; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 66; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 122; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 16; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Ordninance, 1995; Central Act, 1965 - Sections 4; Goa Act, 1965

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR405; 1999(1)BomCR643; (1999)1BOMLR687; [1999(81)FLR767]; (1999)IILLJ109Bom; 1999(1)MhLj489

the least, is starling and contrary to well known principles of construction of statutes. Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, provides that when a Central Act or Regulation repeals any enactment, then, unless a different intention appears, the … against the provisions of section 66 of the Bombay Shops & Establishments Act and against the provisions of section 25 of the Industrial Disputes Act? (4) Does the opponent prove that the employee was appointed as a Supervisor

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 11 2001

J.K. Udaipur Udhyog Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-11-2001

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 15; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(5); Constitution of India - Articles 13 and 14

Reported in : [2003]131STC176(Raj); 2003(1)WLN281

Matched in: Advocate S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv.,; R. Mehta and; Vineet Kothari, S.M. Mehta, Adv.-General and; Sanjeev Johari, Adv.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 1978

Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Vs. B.P. (India) Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-08-1978

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22 and 25(3); ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 6; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3), 297 and 297(2); ;Indian Income Tax Act, 1918

Reported in : [1979]116ITR440(Cal)

in the light of the provisions of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act. S. 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, provides as follows :'6. Effect of repeal.--Where this Act, or any Central Act or Regulation made after the … The assessee had discontinued its business in India on 28th February, 1962, and had filed a claim under Section 25(3) of the Indian I.T. Act, 1922, on 27th March, 1962. In the said claim, it was stated by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 1957

Vishnu Bhatta Subraya Bhatta Vs. Domakkee and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-30-1957

Subject : Property

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 9(1); Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 12 and 25 - Schedule - Article 132

Reported in : AIR1958Ker326

case, the parties will bear their costs throughout. Property - institution of suit - Section 9 (1) of General Clauses Act, 1897 and Sections 12 and 25 and Article 132 of Schedule of Limitation Act, 1908 - dispute regarding institution

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 1926

Emperor Vs. Malhari Laxman

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-01-1926

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1927)29BOMLR186

Officer-Cancellation of probation-Order of return to settlement--Disobedience of the order-Enforcement of order by Magistrate-General Clauses Act (X of 1897), Section 21-Bombay General Clauses Act (Bom. Act 1 of 1904), Section 21.;The accused, who was a registered member of … 1925, and in the absence of any such rule we think that under a 21 of the Bombay General Clauses Act I of 1904, where a power is given by any Act, then that power includes a power to … and was placed before the Magistrate. The acting Fourth Presidency Magistrate held that the accused's case fell under Section 25 (a) of the Act as he was found in Bombay after he was asked to go or restrict

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1984

M. Jamal Company Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-20-1984

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(7), 2(23), 2(27), 11(2), 12, 12(1), 13, 15, 20(2), 22(1), 25, 25(1), 46, 51, 56, 68 and 111; Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 1985(6)ECC202; 1985(21)ELT369(Mad)

the word in the Act. The ordinary definition of the word 'India' is to be found in the General Clauses Act, 1897. Section 3(28)(c) which reads as follows - 'India' shall mean - 'as respects any period after the commencement of … the rate of duty is 'nil' the goods continue to be dutiable. Therefore, the issue of notification under Section 25(1) exempting the goods from duty does not mean that the goods in question are not chargeable to levy

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1990

Poonjabhai Varmalidas Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-09-1990

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 36(1) and 41(4); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24

Reported in : AIR1991SC1; [1990]186ITR572(SC); JT1990(4)SC106; 1992Supp(1)SCC182; [1990]Supp2SCR206

contained in Section 36(1)(vii), and consequently the amounts recovered on any such debt were chargeable Under Section 41(4).6. Section 25 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, in so far as it is material, reads:24. Continuation of orders, etc., … there was no inconsistency between the relevant provisions of the two enactments and that Section 24 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 was attracted as a result of which the order in terms of which the amounts had been written

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 1967

Kalawati Devi Harlalka Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-01-1967

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Income-tax Act 1922 - Sections 18A, 23, 23A, 25, 25A, 29, 31, 33, 33B, 34, 35, 44, 60(1), 131 to 136, 140 to 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 153, 156 to 158, 185, 187 to 189, 282 to 284 and 288; Constitution of India - Article 226; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 297, 297(1), 297(2) and 298; General Clauses Act - Sections 6; Income-tax (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 1962; Finance Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 11, 12, 13 and 13(1); Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 37

Reported in : AIR1968SC162; [1967]66ITR680(SC); [1967]3SCR833

that 'it is not necessary to express any definite opinion on the point whether section 6 of the General Clauses Act 1897, is available for the purpose of interpreting the provisions of the Act of 1961. ' In the result … departure from taxable territories, section 23B deals with collection of tax out of the estate of deceased persons, section 25 deals with assessment in case of discontinued business, section 25A with assessment after partition of Hindu undivided families

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial