Advanced Search Results

State Through S.P., New Delhi Vs. Ratan Lal Arora

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 1(3), 7, 13, 13(1), 13(2), 19, 28 and 40; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 360; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2); Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 18 and 19; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 8; Constitution of India - Article 136; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 562; Reformatory Schools Act, 1897 - Sections 31; Customs Act, 1962; Customs Act, 1878; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 12; Indian Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 2; Indian Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Defence of India Rules - Rule 126P(2); Defence of India Act, 1962 - Sections 43; Coal Mines Provident Fund and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948

Reported in : AIR2004SC2364; 2004(1)ALD(Cri)1011; (2005)1CALLT24(SC); 2004CriLJ2105; 111(2004)DLT250(SC); JT2004(5)SC352; 2004(5)SCALE67; (2004)4SCC590; 2004(3)SLJ331(SC)

Matched in: Advocate L.N. Rao, Additional Soliciter General,; Amit Mahajan,; Uday M.N. Krishnamani, Sr. Adv. and ; Ajay Sharma, Adv.

Harnand Rai Ramanand Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 18(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(35)

Reported in : (1986)52CTR(Raj)56; [1986]159ITR988(Raj); 1985(1)WLN742

1961, the word 'month' has been defined. The word 'month' has been defined in Section 3(35) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 (No. X of 1897), as under:'(35) 'month' shall mean a month reckoned according to the British calendar.'According to … an important question of law with respect to interpretation of the words ' every month' used in Section 18(1)(i) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (No. XXVII of 1957), (for short 'the Act')'. We may also state that

Neena Aneja Vs. Jai Prakash Associates Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 2019, among other provisions of the new legislation, and its interplay with Section 6 of the 6 General Clauses Act 1897 . The analysis of the Court, despite the new legislation, will not proceed on a clean slate for … July 2020. The appellants 3 instituted a consumer case before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal 4 Commission on 18 June 2020. The consumer case was instituted under the 5 provisions of the erstwhile legislation, the Consumer Protection

In Re: Keshav Madhav Menon

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Press (Emergency Powers) Act, 1931 - Sections 18(1); Constitution of India - Articles 13(1), 367 and 395

Reported in : AIR1951Bom188; (1950)52BOMLR540; ILR1950Bom529

Matched in: Advocate L.M. Jhaveri and ;H.S. Bhat, Advs. C.K. Daphatary, Adv. General and ;B.G. Thakor, Addl. Asst. Govt. Pleader

Rehaman and anr. Vs. the Corporation of the City of Nagpur and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7, 12, 16 and 20; City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 5(12), 6, 7, 9, 408, 409, 409(2) and 409(3); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 2(31) and 18; Bengal Municipal Act, 1932; Companies Act - Sections 446; Bengal Municipal (Amendment) Act, 1954; Rajasthan Municipalities Act - Sections 295(5);

Reported in : AIR1970Bom394; (1971)73BOMLR344; 1970CriLJ1436; 1970MhLJ618

Act let us see what it means under the General Clauses Act. Under Section 2 (31) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 the expression 'local authority' is defined: 'Local authority' shall mean, according to this definition a municipal committee, district … therefore, be safely construed that the 'local authority' means- the Municipal Corporation of the City of Nagpur. Under Section 18 of the General Clauses Act there is a provision regarding the successors. Under this section, in any Central

State of Maharashtra Vs. Kusum Charudutt Bharma Upadhye

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1981)83BOMLR75; 1981MhLJ93

38(1) of the Interpretation Act, 1889 (52 & 53 vict. c.63) of England, and Section 8 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. Section 38(1) of the Interpretation Act provides as follows:38. Effect of repeal in future ,Acts,(1) Where this Act or … of one Judge of the said High Court, or of one Judge of any Division Court, pursuant to section 18 of the said recited Act; and that an appeal shall also lie to the said High Court from

Someshwar Bapurao Nilakhe Vs. Nivritti Baburao Gholave

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 18(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 9(1)

Reported in : AIR1973Bom147; (1972)74BOMLR647; 1972MhLJ916

be computed from the time when the acknowledgment was so signed (underlining is mine). Section 1 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, provides that in any General Act or Regulation made after the commencement of this Act, it shall be … appeal or application, the day from which such period is to be reckoned shall be excluded. Now, under Section 18(1) where, before the expiration of the prescribed period for a suit or application in respect of any property

V. Chandrasekaran and anr. Vs. the Administrative Officer and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 17, 5-A, 6, 18, 16, 48; General Clauses Act, 1897

released from acquisition proceedings either under Section 48 of the Act, or in exercise of powers under the General Clauses Act, 1897, but this can be done only prior to the vesting of the land in the State, which in … is nothing on record to show whether the claimants had filed any application for making a reference under Section 18 of the Act. G. The tenure-holders/persons-interested in the suit land, after receiving compensation, and handing over the possession

Shri Rahul Sharad Awasthi Vs. Shri Ratnakar Trimbak Pandit and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 1(2), 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 16, 16(2), 100A and 102; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) Amendment Act, 1978 - Sections 97; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 7, 10, 13, 16 and 32; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 97; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rules 5, 15, 17 and 18 - Order 20, Rule 1; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Sphere of Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F

Reported in : 2004(3)ALLMR896; 2004(5)BomCR50; 2004(4)CTC241; 2004(3)MhLj706

till the rest of the career of the suit coupled with the fact that Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 declares that where the said Act or any Central Act repeals any enactment, unless a different intention appears, … reconsideration.2. The present Letters Patent Appeal presented on January 6, 2004 is directed against the order dated December 18, 2003 passed by the learned Single Judge summarily dismissing the First Appeal arising out of the suit for

Chunilal Vallabhaji Gandhi Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Drugs Act, 1940 - Sections 3, 18, 21, 32, 32(1), 33, 33(1) and 33(2); Bombay Drugs Rules, 1946; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(19) and 24; Drugs (Amendment) Act, 1955 - Sections 12; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1955 - Sections 251A; Central Drugs Rules, 1945

Reported in : AIR1959Bom554; (1959)61BOMLR807; 1959CriLJ1429; ILR1959Bom1336

remained in force under the amended Section 3(1) of the Act by virtue of Section 24 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, till they were repealed by fresh rules framed by the Central Government in 1957. - - 3. The … 1. The appellant was convicted by the Presidency Magistrate, 27th Court, Mulund, Bombay, of an offence under Section 18(c) read with Section 27 of the Drugs Act, 1940, and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 250/-