Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: general clauses act 1897 section 17 · Page 1 of about 3,363 results (0.128 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 25 1998

Harnek Singh Vs. the State of Punjab [Overruled] Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-25-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 17 and 30; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 24

Reported in : 1999CriLJ635

Punjab Government under S. 30(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and under S. 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 issued the notifications Annexures R1 and R2 authorising all the Inspectors of Police, Vigilance Department, to investigate the … in this case cannot claim to be released under proviso (a) to S. 167(2) of the New Code.' Section 17 of the Corruption Act, 1988 reads as under :- 17. Persons authorised to investigate - Notwithstanding anything contained

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 1966

State of Madhya Pradesh and ors. Vs. Vishnu Prasad Sharma and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-09-1966

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5A, 6, 7, 8 to 15, 16, 17, 17(1), 17(4), 18 to 28, 31 to 34, 38 to 44, 48, 48(1), 48(2), 48(3), 49, 49(2) and 49(3); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21

Reported in : AIR1966SC1593; 1966MhLJ969(SC); [1966]3SCR557

(2), 48 (3), 49, 49 (2) and 49 (3) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Section 21 of General Clauses Act, 1897 - whether number of declarations under Section 6 can be issued successively in respect of different piece of … of persons whose lands are taken away. 4. Reference was then made to sub-sections (1) and (4) of Section 17. These give the Government the power to take possessions of waste and arable lands included in the notification

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 26 1989

T.R. Mishra and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-26-1989

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 50, 234, 235, 236, 237 and 367; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 9, 9(2) and 85; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(17); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 11; ;Bombay General Clauses Act - Sections 3(28)

Reported in : (1990)2GLR1103

may be specified in the notification.' Article 367(1) reads as follows : 'Unless the context otherwise requires, the General Clauses Act, 1897, shall, subject to any adaptations and modifications that may be made therein under Art. 372, apply for the … a Tribunal is not a Court, to which we will refer hereafter. 17. In as much as the Labour Courts and Industrial Courts are deciding … 'A' to the petition are without any authority or competence. They have also challenged the Constitutional validity of Section 9 of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946, under which the State Government has the power to constitute

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 15 2002

Gandhimathi Ramayya Vs. Syed Mohideen

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-15-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 5, 17, 17(2), 97(3) and 102; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6

Reported in : (2003)1MLJ363

sub-section(1) has taken effect, and without prejudice to the generality of the provisions of section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 (10 of 1897). (a) the provision of section 102 of the principal Act as substituted by section 5 … decree, when the subject-matter of the original suit is for recovery of money not exceeding twenty-five thousand rupees'.10. Section 17(2)(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002 deals with Repeal and Savings, which reads as follows:-'17.Repeal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1954

Babulal Agarwalla Vs. Province of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jan-21-1954

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4(1), 5(2), 523(1) and 550; Defence of India Rules, 1939 - Rules 81, 81(2), 81(4), 124 and 128; Food Grains Control Order, 1942 - Sections 3(1); Defence of India Act, 1939 - Sections 17(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(20); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 103; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 2

Reported in : AIR1954Ori225

Matched in: Advocate M.S. Rao, Adv. in F.A. No. 18/46 and ;Adv. General in F.A. No. 23/46 Adv. General in F.A. No. 18/46 and ;N. Mukherji, Adv. in F.A. No. 23/46

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1998

M/S. Saudi Arabian Airlines Vs. Mrs. Shehnaz Mudbhatkal and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-25-1998

Subject : Labour and IndustrialFood Adulteration

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1) and 2, 11-A, 12(5), 17 and 25; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1996; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 58(3); Air Corporations Act, 1953; Constitution of India - Articles 20(1), 226 and 227; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 66; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 122; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 16; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Ordninance, 1995; Central Act, 1965 - Sections 4; Goa Act, 1965

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR405; 1999(1)BomCR643; (1999)1BOMLR687; [1999(81)FLR767]; (1999)IILLJ109Bom; 1999(1)MhLj489

the least, is starling and contrary to well known principles of construction of statutes. Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, provides that when a Central Act or Regulation repeals any enactment, then, unless a different intention appears, the … made by the Labour Court on 16th April 1996 was sent to the State Government for publication under section 17 of the Act. Since on and from 11th October 1995 the State Government ceased to be the appropriate

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 1997

J. Jayalalitha Vs. Her Excellency the Governor of Tamil Nadu, Raj Bhav ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-01-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India -- Articles 77, 163, 166, 258-A and 361; General Clauses Act, 1897 -- Sections 3(60); Indial Penal Code (IPC), 1860 -- Sections 13, 21, 120-B, 169, 409, 420 and 477-A; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 -- Sections 19 and 30; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 -- Sections 17 and 197; Constitution of India (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC493

is the Governor again who can dismiss or remove the Minister from Office. Under Section 3(6) of the General Clauses Act, 1897, the word 'State Government' has been defined. Clause (c) of Section 3(60) is applicable to the present case … expression 'Central Government' were substituted)'40. The term 'State Government' has not been defined in the Code ofCriminal Procedure. Section 17 of the Indian Penal Code defines the term'Government' denotes Central Government or the Government of a State. Thedefinition

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1986

State of Maharashtra Vs. Labour Law Practitioners's Association

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-09-1986

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 7(3); Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1974; ; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 9(2); Bombay Industrial Relations (Amendment) Act, 1977; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 6; Constitution of India - Articles 234 and 236; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(17); Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 3(15)

Reported in : 1988(2)BomCR16; (1987)89BOMLR120; [1987(54)FLR732]; 1987MhLJ191

it is convenient to quote the identical definition of 'district judge' that appears in section 3(17) of the General Clauses Act, 1897, and section 3(15) of the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904. It reads thus :' 'District Judge' shall mean

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2021

Neena Aneja Vs. Jai Prakash Associates Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-16-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 2019, among other provisions of the new legislation, and its interplay with Section 6 of the 6 General Clauses Act 1897 . The analysis of the Court, despite the new legislation, will not proceed on a clean slate for … 11, the jurisdiction of the District Commission to entertain 7 original complaints was rupees twenty lacs . Under Section 17, the State 8 Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission had jurisdiction to entertain complaints where the value of the goods

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2007

Binod Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-31-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 22(5); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 11, 11(1), 12, 12(2) and 21; PIT Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act; Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 - Sections 14; Bihar Control of Crimes Act, 1981 - Sections 8(1), 12(2), 12(3), 17 and 23(1); Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 7(1); Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 3(2), 3(3) and 14(1); Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 21; Cognate Act - Sections 11

Matched in: Advocate Ram Suresh Rai, Sr. Adv., Bhola Prasad, Dilip Kumar and Swapnil Kumar Singh, Advs. Lalit Kishor, Sr. Adv. and Addl. Adv. General 3

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial