Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: general clauses act 1897 section 11 · Page 1 of about 4,300 results (0.149 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 07 2003

A. Ekambara Naicker Vs. Land Acquisition Officer-cum-revenue Divisiona ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-07-2003

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 12(2), 18, 18(1) and 18(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 11, 12(3), 21 and 27; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Indian Post Office Rules

Reported in : 2003(4)ALT296

submits that as the petitioner has sent application by registered post the presumption Under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 comes into play and the application should be deemed to have been served on the first respondent. He … of the General Clauses Act, it was laid down.It is true that the proviso to Clause (i) of Section 11 and the proviso to Section 12(3) are intended for the protection of the tenant. Nevertheless it will be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 1980

State of Maharashtra Vs. Kusum Charudutt Bharma Upadhye

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-17-1980

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1981)83BOMLR75; 1981MhLJ93

38(1) of the Interpretation Act, 1889 (52 & 53 vict. c.63) of England, and Section 8 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. Section 38(1) of the Interpretation Act provides as follows:38. Effect of repeal in future ,Acts,(1) Where this Act or … under Section 10 the High Courts were to exercise all jurisdictions possessed by the Supreme Courts, and under Section 11 all existing provisions in law applicable to the Supreme Courts were to apply to High Courts. These three

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 1994

Kamleshkumar Ishwardas Patel Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-1994

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1995(43)BLJR295; 1995(2)BomCR640; 1994CriLJ3105; 1994(2)MhLj1669

power of revocation or modification are the State Government and the Central Government. But Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which would even otherwise have applied to the provisions of the COFEPOSA Act ex proprio vigore, clearly, provides … officer under the COFEPOSA Act also an independent power to revoke the order of detention in view of Section 11 of the COFEPOSA Act read with Section 21 of the General Clauses Act (2) Are observations in Amir

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 26 2012

Nafis Ahmad and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-26-2012

Subject : Civil

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 11

space measured along the shortest path joining them”.He also contended that in absence of meaning of distance, the General Clauses Act, 1897 will be followed and, therefore, if we go by Section 11 of the said General Clauses Act, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 1971

K. Subramania Iyer and anr. Vs. Olaganathan Pillai and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-08-1971

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 48, 64 and 230; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 and 5; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 10; Madras General Clauses Act, 1891 - Sections 11; Rent Recovery Act (Madras), 1865 - Sections 15; Bengal Tenancy Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1882 - Sections 320

Reported in : AIR1972Mad250; (1971)IIMLJ233

230 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Sections 4 and 5 of Limitation Act, 1963, Section 10 of General Clauses Act, 1897, Section 11 of Madras General Clauses Act, 1891, Section 15 of Rent Recovery Act (Madras), 1865 and Section 320 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 1963

State of Maharashtra Vs. Syndicate Transport Co. (P) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-26-1963

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 2, 11, 403, 406 and 420; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3 and 3(42); Indian Companies Act, 1917; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 386 and 388; Defence (General) Regulations, 1939; Interpretation Act, 1889 - Sections 2; Calcutta Municipal Act - Sections 407; Criminal Law

Reported in : AIR1964Bom195; (1964)66BOMLR197; 1964CriLJ276; 1964MhLJ308

more or less on par with the definition of that word given in Section 3(42) of the (Central) General Clauses Act, 1897 which is in the following words:'3 (42): 'person' shall include any company or association or body of individuals … 2 of the Indian Penal Code every person shall be liable for punishment under the Code and under Section 11 ibid, a corporate body like a company is included in the definition of a 'person' and, therefore, a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2000

Tarun Prasad Chatterjee Vs. Dinanath Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-10-2000

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 53, 66, 67(A), 81(1), 100 and 101; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 9 and 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11; Representation of the People (Conduct of Election & Election Petitions) Rules, 1951 - Rules 2(6) and 119; Indian Limitation Act, 1963

Reported in : 2000(6)ALT15(SC); 2000(3)BLJR2415; 2000(6)SCALE729; (2000)8SCC649; [2000]Supp3SCR634; 2001(1)LC345(SC)

date of election of the returned candidate. The respondent contended that in view of Section 9 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, the Election Petition was filed in time. The plea of the respondent-Election Petitioner was accepted by the learned … of the appellant. That Petition was filed on 12-1-1999. The appellant filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC read with Section 81 of the R.P. Act 1951, praying that the Election Petition was liable to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2001

Rajesh Hansraj Chopra Vs. the Competent Authority and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-27-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 2(2), 4, 6, 6(1), 7, 8, 9, 9(2), (3), 12-A and 12-A(6); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1947 - Sections 11

Reported in : 2002BomCR(Cri)96; (2001)4BOMLR144; 2002(79)ECC776

as follows :'11 Revocation of detention orders,- (1) Without prejudice to the provisions of Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 (10 of 1897), a detention order may, at any time, be revoked or modified- (a) notwithstanding that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2001

M/S. Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. Vs. M/S. Amrit Lal and Co. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-27-2001

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 3, 14 and 14(1); Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 1(3); Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1988; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106 and 111; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 7, Rule 11; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 31(2); Central Excise Rule; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Houses Rates Control Act, 1947; Saurashtra Act - Sections 13(1); Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955; Rajasthan General Clauses act, 1955; Interpretation Act, 1889 - Sections 38(2); Repealing Act; Punjab act, 1948 - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR2001SC3580; 93(2001)DLT164(SC); JT2001(7)SC477; 2001(5)SCALE509; (2001)8SCC397

of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act was considered.25. We may quote here Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897:'Section 6: Effect of repeal Where this Act, or any (Central Act) or Regulation made after the commencement of … took away such tenancies from the purview of the aforesaid Act. Thereafter the landlord sent a notice on 11.9.1991 terminating the tenancy of the appellant under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act. On 18.11.1991 landlord

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1997

Varun Seacon Ltd. Vs. Bharat Bijlee Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-14-1997

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20 and 34; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 8, 11(5) and 85; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Arbitration Law

Reported in : AIR1998Guj99; (1997)3GLR2553

actions which were commenced, prosecuted and concluded while it was existing law ........' However Section 6 of the General Clauses Act 1897, provides, inter alia, that where the Act repeals any enactment, unless a different intention appears, the repeal shall … ought to have been rejected. (4) Arbitration Application No. 1 of 1996, purporting to be an application under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the New Act'), is in the nature

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial